I recently came across machineering and their simulation platform iPhysics at a trade fair, and it caught my attention, so I wanted to learn a bit more about it from people who have actually used it in real projects.
I’d be really interested to hear how your overall experience with iPhysics has been in everyday use, what you mainly use it for, and how easy it is to work with in practice. I’m also curious about how quickly teams can get familiar with it, whether it fits well into existing workflows, and if there are any drawbacks or challenges that became noticeable over time.
If anyone has also worked with similar platforms, I’d love to hear how iPhysics compares and what you think its strengths and weaknesses are.
Any honest feedback or experiences would be greatly appreciated.

10 hours ago, Zerbo said:

I recently came across machineering and their simulation platform iPhysics at a trade fair, and it caught my attention, so I wanted to learn a bit more about it from people who have actually used it in real projects.
I’d be really interested to hear how your overall experience with iPhysics has been in everyday use, what you mainly use it for, and how easy it is to work with in practice. I’m also curious about how quickly teams can get familiar with it, whether it fits well into existing workflows, and if there are any drawbacks or challenges that became noticeable over time.
If anyone has also worked with similar platforms, I’d love to hear how iPhysics compares and what you think its strengths and weaknesses are.
Any honest feedback or experiences would be greatly appreciated.

From a quick look at the company website it seems very specialised to small, perhaps intricate, machine tools.

Simulation software has been around a long time and, depending upon the enormously wide range of processes (probably almost all process) that can be simulated as well as the type of simulation required, may or may not be suitable for any given application.