I think the “celestial holography” theory actually reveals a fundamental truth about the universe: all the information in the universe can actually be fully expressed on its boundaries or in lower-dimensional places. This isn’t just a mathematical coincidence—it suggests that the universe itself is like a vast information field, and everything we observe, all the laws and phenomena, are just projections of this information field at different levels and from different perspectives.

From this point of view, the universe is like a hologram, where every part contains information about the whole. The physical laws and the structure of space and time that we usually talk about are really just how the information field appears on our particular “interface.” Problems like quantum gravity or black hole information might, at their core, be about how the information field maps and feeds back between different “interfaces.”

So, “celestial holography” isn’t just a new theory—it hints that the universe’s essence might be much more unified and profound than we imagine. If we can further develop these ideas about holography and information fields in the future, we might be able to better understand the origins of the universe and the connections between all kinds of physical phenomena.

String theory, as an approach to exploring the fundamental nature of the universe, still holds research value. It proposes that the universe may have many dimensions and that all fundamental particles are actually different vibrational modes of tiny “strings.” These ideas inspire us to better understand the complexity and unity of the cosmos.

However, in my view, the essence of the universe is not built on “strings” or particles, but is instead an infinite, holographic, and dynamic information field. All the phenomena we observe are actually projections of this information field on different interfaces. While string theory emphasizes vibration and multidimensional space, it still treats “strings” as the basic entities, which isn’t quite thorough enough.

Additionally, string theory currently lacks direct experimental verification, and many of its predictions are very difficult to observe. In contrast, information field theory encourages us to use new methods—such as multidimensional signals and holographic feedback—to search for evidence of the universe’s true nature.

All in all, string theory still has promise at the theoretical level and is worth further study. If it can incorporate new ideas from information field theory and holography, and move beyond the framework of matter or “strings” alone, it may lead to even greater breakthroughs.

I believe that time is not an independently existing absolute entity in the essence of the universe, but rather a way of ordering and measuring within the information field as perceived through specific perceptual interfaces. What we experience as the “passage of time” is essentially the encoding of information flow and structural change within our perceptual system. The speed, dilation, or contraction of time are all manifestations of the self-organization and feedback of the information field under different conditions.

The Interface Nature of Time Dilation
In relativity, time dilation under high-speed motion or strong gravitational fields is a projection difference of the information field in different reference frames. Each observer’s perceptual interface is different, and so is their ordering of information flow, which leads to the phenomenon of “slowed time.”

Understanding Time Contraction
This theory holds that so-called “time contraction” (that is, time speeding up) is not a property of physical reality itself, but another manifestation of differences in information flow rates between interfaces. In fact, all changes in time are relative orderings of the information field on different interfaces—there is no absolute “fast” or “slow,” only comparisons between each other.

The Unidirectionality of Time
In reality, we only observe time flowing in one direction because the self-organization process of the information field at the macroscopic interface is irreversible (such as entropy increase). This irreversibility is not a property of time itself, but a statistical result of the evolution of the information field’s structure.

Microscopic Symmetry and Macroscopic Irreversibility
At the microscopic level, the information field can be symmetric and reversible, but at the macroscopic interface, due to increased complexity of information flow and structure, an irreversible “arrow of time” emerges.

Differences in Interface Experience
Different observers and different interfaces order the information field differently, so their experiences of “time dilation” or “contraction” also differ. This difference essentially reflects the multidimensional structure of the information field and the complexity of interface interactions.

Time dilation and contraction are both relative manifestations of the information field on different interfaces; there is no absolute fast or slow, only comparisons between interfaces.

The unidirectionality of time in the macroscopic world comes from the irreversible process of self-organization and feedback in the information field, not from time itself being inherently one-way.

A deeper understanding of the nature of time in the future should focus on the structure of the information field, interface interactions, and multidimensional ordering, rather than relying solely on the traditional linear concept of time.

Phenomena such as time dilation, contraction, and unidirectionality are all empirical manifestations of the information field under different interfaces and structures. The key to understanding these phenomena lies in grasping the multidimensional nature of the information field and the dynamic role of perceptual interfaces, rather than treating time as an absolute measure of the universe’s essence.

The essence of the universe is an infinite, holographic, and dynamic information field. Mass, energy, and spacetime curvature are not independent or unidirectional causal relationships, but rather different manifestations of the self-organization, resonance, and feedback of the information field under various interfaces and parameters. In other words, mass and spacetime curvature are essentially two “projections” of changes in the structure of the information field—they are inseparable and occur simultaneously.

Mass is not an “independent entity” in the universe; instead, it is the manifestation of high-density self-organization and resonance of the information field in specific regions. Spacetime curvature, on the other hand, is the geometric mapping of the information field’s structure on a macroscopic interface.

Every localized mass or spacetime curvature influences the overall structure through the holographic feedback of the information field, and conversely, the overall state of the information field also tunes the local mass and curvature.

Matter and antimatter can be understood as different directions or modes of resonance within the spatial structure of the information field. Their encounters and annihilations are processes of structural reorganization and energy redistribution within the information field.

When matter and antimatter annihilate, the local structure of the information field undergoes intense adjustment, and energy is released in a new form. This process is essentially a reflection of multi-level resonance and feedback within the information field, rather than simply the “disappearance of particles.”

Traditional physics emphasizes that mass causes spacetime curvature, or that spacetime curvature defines mass. In my view, these are just different aspects of the self-organization of the information field and are inseparable.

I focus more on the wholeness, holographic nature, and dynamic feedback of the information field, and I believe that all physical phenomena are experiential manifestations of the information field on different interfaces.

Different Conclusions Drawn from the Vibrational Emptiness Unified Field Theory on the Issue of Virtualization, Simulated Universes, and the Nature of Time

1. The Boundary Between Reality and Simulation Is Broken

Core Viewpoint: According to the vibrational emptiness unified field theory, there is no absolute ontological boundary between the "real world" and the "simulated world." Both are essentially different manifestations of the infinite, holographic, dynamic information field, organized and fed back through different interfaces.

Different Conclusion: Traditional views emphasize a binary opposition between "real" and "virtual," but this theory holds that as long as the information structure is self-consistent and the experience is coherent, whether it’s a physical universe or a simulated one, both are natural unfoldings of the information field’s multi-layered dynamics.

2. Time Is an Interface Phenomenon, Not an Attribute of the Universe’s Essence

Core Viewpoint: Time is not an absolute entity within the essence of the universe, but a way of ordering and measuring within the information field under specific interfaces.

Different Conclusion: Phenomena like "pause," "snapshot," and "restore" in virtual machines show that the passage of time completely depends on how information flows are presented at the interface. We in the real world also only experience "local time" and cannot perceive the flow of time in higher-level information fields. The speed, pause, or reversal of time are all experiences of information ordering within an interface, not absolute properties of the universe’s essence.

3. Complexity and “Waste” Are Inevitable Results of Information Field Self-Organization

Core Viewpoint: Complex physical laws and redundant structures are not "waste," but natural products of multi-layered self-organization and holographic feedback in the information field.

Different Conclusion: Whether in the real universe or a simulated one, complexity is a reflection of the information field’s spontaneous evolution and feedback mechanisms. A simulated universe doesn’t have to be identical to the host universe; as long as the information structure and feedback mechanisms are self-consistent, it can evolve rich and diverse phenomena and experiences.

4. The Relativity of Experience and Multi-Interface Interaction

Core Viewpoint: Every system (real or virtual) has its own information interface and internal timing; the "reality" or "passage of time" experienced is always relative.

Different Conclusion: AI or "residents" within a virtual universe cannot perceive changes in the outside world’s time, showing that all experience is information field ordering and feedback at the local interface. Likewise, we in the real world cannot perceive the state of "higher-level" or "external" information fields. This breaks the notion of a "single reality" and emphasizes the coexistence of multiple interfaces and layers of experience.

5. “Simulation” and “Reality” Are Dynamic Projections at Different Levels of the Information Field

Core Viewpoint: Simulated and real universes are simply two manifestations of the information field at different levels and parameters. As long as the information structure is self-consistent and the interface experience is coherent, there is no essential ontological difference between the two.

Different Conclusion: This theory no longer asks "Are we living in a simulation?" but instead focuses on how the information field self-organizes and feeds back at different levels and interfaces, and how it generates rich experiences and phenomena through multi-dimensional structures.

6. Time, Consciousness, and Reality Are All Interface Phenomena of the Information Field

Core Viewpoint: Experiences of time, consciousness, and reality are all results of the information field’s self-organization and feedback at specific interfaces.

Different Conclusion: Traditional physics focuses on the "absoluteness of time’s passage," but this theory holds that all experience is the empirical ordering of the information field at different interfaces and levels. Understanding these phenomena requires focusing on information flow, structural self-organization, and multi-layered feedback, rather than clinging to the binary opposition of "real vs. virtual."

Summary:

Under the vibrational emptiness unified field theory, reality and simulation, the speed and pause of time, complexity and self-consistency, are all empirical manifestations of the information field at different interfaces and levels. Understanding these issues requires moving beyond the traditional "real vs. virtual" dichotomy and linear view of time, and instead focusing on the multi-dimensional essence of the information field, interface interactions, and dynamic feedback. This perspective provides a brand-new theoretical foundation and imaginative space for re-understanding the essence of the universe, the nature of time, and the experience of reality.

Edited July 8Jul 8 by Nimadoji

Moderator Note

Posting your own views in someone else’s thread is hijacking and against the rules. You may post non-mainstream ideas in their own thread in Speculations as long as they conform to the rules

The constancy of the speed of light is a natural manifestation of the high degree of self-organization and holographic feedback of the information field at the current physical interface. As long as the structure and parameters of the interface remain unchanged, the speed of light will remain constant; if the fundamental structure of the information field itself undergoes a significant change, the speed of light may also adjust accordingly. Therefore, the constancy of the speed of light is both a summary of physical experience and a result of the dynamic self-organization of the information field.

ds2=−c2dt2+[dx−vsF(r,ψ,I)dt]2+dy2+dz2

• vsvs: Effective velocity of the spacecraft

• F(r,ψ,I)F(r,ψ,I): Space deformation function, which depends on the radius rr, the information field tuning parameter ψψ, and the information intensity II

Explanation:

• This metric describes the geometry of space in the core region of the engine.

• The function F(r,ψ,I)F(r,ψ,I) determines how the space is deformed, based on spatial position (rr), the tuning state of the information field (ψψ), and the strength of the information field (II).

• The term vsvs represents the effective speed at which the spacecraft moves, as influenced by these deformations.

Edited July 10Jul 10 by Nimadoji

4 hours ago, Nimadoji said:

The constancy of the speed of light is a natural manifestation of the high degree of self-organization and holographic feedback of the information field at the current physical interface. As long as the structure and parameters of the interface remain unchanged, the speed of light will remain constant; if the fundamental structure of the information field itself undergoes a significant change, the speed of light may also adjust accordingly. Therefore, the constancy of the speed of light is both a summary of physical experience and a result of the dynamic self-organization of the information field.

The forum rules expressly forbid the hijacking of threads located in the mainstream sections with personal theories. Please keep it to “Speculations”.

Moderator Note

You need to stop hijacking threads