OT/split from electricity from the air?

[Brett Nortj]

Look, I don't really want to play with the tedium of voltage, but if you wanted voltage from the air, you need only condense the most static of gases, [oxygen]. This is the best conductor, so, will be the best source of energy. If you were to observe that if you rub your hands together, you will generate static, and you can apply that shock to whatever you wish, you could also use the carbon in the air, to bond with the oxygen - hey you got 'soot.' Soot is 'gaseous oil,' for lack of a better terminology, and oil burns easily, so, from the air, your best bet is to go to China, and, 'rub that stuff together,' yes?

If you were to merely condense the soot, you will have a sort of water vapour cola effort going on. If you were to spark a room filled with soot, enough of it, you will get a fire, in the air. This is because the carbon is just in gas form, and, has lost mass. This means that the carbon it he air can become a source for the energy to be generated, of course. This means, as there is conductive gas in the air, there could be a power source, although a weak one, unless you 'compress' it. This could be done by, as the op says, air compression, and, that is because the compressed air could also be viewed as a canister of aerosol, where it generates more mass than it has outside.

Converting this to voltage or something would require a 'beacon' or receptor in the area of the compression, of course. As mass is condensed onto the receptor, the energy, as mass is stored energy, will collect into the 'conductive receptor.' This could be made easier, with, water vapour. This would take the static and bond it to the beacon, and, then the energy would collect into the receptor, of course.

But, this is explaining it for kids, if you will. Yes it will work, in my opinion, no doubt.

[John Cuthber]

On 8/2/2018 at 4:34 AM, Brett Nortj said:

Look, I don't really want to play with the tedium of voltage, but if you wanted voltage from the air, you need only condense the most static of gases, [oxygen]. This is the best conductor, so, will be the best source of energy. If you were to observe that if you rub your hands together, you will generate static, and you can apply that shock to whatever you wish, you could also use the carbon in the air, to bond with the oxygen - hey you got 'soot.' Soot is 'gaseous oil,' for lack of a better terminology, and oil burns easily, so, from the air, your best bet is to go to China, and, 'rub that stuff together,' yes?

If you were to merely condense the soot, you will have a sort of water vapour cola effort going on. If you were to spark a room filled with soot, enough of it, you will get a fire, in the air. This is because the carbon is just in gas form, and, has lost mass. This means that the carbon it he air can become a source for the energy to be generated, of course. This means, as there is conductive gas in the air, there could be a power source, although a weak one, unless you 'compress' it. This could be done by, as the op says, air compression, and, that is because the compressed air could also be viewed as a canister of aerosol, where it generates more mass than it has outside.

Converting this to voltage or something would require a 'beacon' or receptor in the area of the compression, of course. As mass is condensed onto the receptor, the energy, as mass is stored energy, will collect into the 'conductive receptor.' This could be made easier, with, water vapour. This would take the static and bond it to the beacon, and, then the energy would collect into the receptor, of course.

But, this is explaining it for kids, if you will. Yes it will work, in my opinion, no doubt.

I have seldom seen so many fundamental errors in just one post.

[Brett Nortj]

1 minute ago, John Cuthber said:

I have seldom seen so many fundamental errors in just one post.

Which exactly are you referring to?

[John Cuthber]

On 8/2/2018 at 4:34 AM, Brett Nortj said:

most static of gases

gases are not static.

On 8/2/2018 at 4:34 AM, Brett Nortj said:

but if you wanted voltage from the air, you need only condense the most static of gases, [oxygen].

You can just put a wire in sky- no need to condense anything

 

4 minutes ago, John Cuthber said:

the most static of gases, [oxygen]. This is the best conductor,

No, it's not.

 

6 minutes ago, John Cuthber said:

This is the best conductor, so, will be the best source of energy.

It's not a source of energy

 

And so on.

[Brett Nortj]

11 minutes ago, John Cuthber said:

gases are not static.

You can just put a wire in sky- no need to condense anything

No, it's not.

It's not a source of energy

And so on.

G wiz, I cannot remember writing this so poorly. Thanks.

[Brett Nortj]

10 hours ago, John Cuthber said:

gases are not static.

You can just put a wire in sky- no need to condense anything

No, it's not.

It's not a source of energy

And so on.

[1] Gases conduct electricity. This is because there is electricity in the air.

[2] This is a better way of condensing energy out of the air through relays to the beacon. Wetting the wire, now you talking! That is why when you wet something, it sparks, because there is kinetic energy in the air.

[3] Okay, maybe not oxygen, how about Flourine? It has the highest electronegativity, after all? Oxygen would make a great substitute though, as it constitutes that thing called water, yes? Or, water is made up of two thirds oxygen, and, you know what happens when you wet a wire that is plugged in.

[4] It is a great conductor.

[John Cuthber]

50 minutes ago, Brett Nortj said:

Gases conduct electricity. This is because there is electricity in the air.

It's far from clear which way causality works there.

there is electricity in the air.

This is because

Gases conduct electricity.

51 minutes ago, Brett Nortj said:

his is a better way of condensing energy out of the air through relays to the beacon. Wetting the wire, now you talking! That is why when you wet something, it sparks, because there is kinetic energy in the air.

word salad

 

51 minutes ago, Brett Nortj said:

how about Flourine

How about , at least, learning to spell the words you misuse.

 

52 minutes ago, Brett Nortj said:

Or, water is made up of two thirds oxygen,

No neither by mass nor by number of atoms.

 

You will see that this thread has been split off from the main discussion- that's because you were talking nonsense.

I strongly urge you to stop doing so.