'']Yes! That was exactly the example I gave when I was asking about it. I didn't see how two observers could agree in a situation like that, but I was assured that yes, a mass moving quickly enough would indeed collapse into a black hole. This is irritating, I keep on going back and forth here.

 

 

AFAIK it's rest mass. Energy goes into the stress-energy tensor, but not frame-dependent translational KE. You measure it in the rest frame of the mass.

How many times are you going to post the same nothing? I think it's "put up or shut up" time. Either post your hypothesis or don't, but it serves absolutely no purpose to tell us how it will explain everything, when you've explained nothing thus far, and each new post adds nothing.

 

I meant no offense sir. I was thanking this person for adding a few sparks. Im sorry about stating my opinion if it offends you and will try to avoid doing so from now on.