Martin Posted July 8, 2005 Share Posted July 8, 2005 Here is the record of research paper postings in LQG-type quantum cosmology. Year # papers w. keyword Loop+Quantum+Cosmology 2001 11 2002 13 2003 21 2004 35 here are the links to get those numbers: http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2001/0/1 http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2002/0/1 http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2003/0/1 http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2004/0/1 the search is imperfect and picks up some unintended stuff which is a significant percentage early on, in 2001 and 2002, but does not matter very much later. WHAT DO YOU GUESS THE 2005 NUMBER WILL BE? We will find it by using this link, anytime after January 1, 2006. Six months from now. http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2005/0/1 If there is very little Quantum Cosmology activity for the rest of this year then it will be in the 20s. A bit more activity and it will be in the 30s. And so on. I am curious as to who among us SFN folk are good guessers, so I'm making it a public poll (unless I goof with the set-up) and if someone has a particular number you are cordially invited to post it! Personally I like the number 46. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.C.MacSwell Posted July 8, 2005 Share Posted July 8, 2005 53 for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 9, 2005 Author Share Posted July 9, 2005 53 for me! that was quick. thank you MacSwell, luc, Yourda! hope there will be more. so far: Guesser Loop Quantum Cosmology papers on arxiv in 2005 luc 40-49 MacSwell 53 me 46 Yourda 40-49 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyman Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Above J.C.MacSwell = 55. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 49 or less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 11, 2005 Author Share Posted July 11, 2005 Guesser keyword Loop+Quantum+Cosmology papers on arxiv in 2005 luc 40-49 MacSwell 53 me 46 Spyman 55 Yourda 40-49 YT2095 49 or less here is the link that gives 2005 to date, of papers with keywords loop+quantum+cosmology in their title or abstract summary http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2005/0/1 I want to mention again that this search picks up some stray papers that happen to have all three keywords in their summary abstract at the beginning, even though aren't technically LQC papers. THAT'S OK, we are forecasting the gross number. I have to make this the rule because at the beginning I did not bother to filter out the stray "imposters" in the numbers I gave for past years. If no one objects I would like to leave the poll open some more. People who predicted ranges (like 40-49) please consider narrowing it down to one number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted July 11, 2005 Share Posted July 11, 2005 Martin has gone poll crazy! Put me down for a cool 107... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 11, 2005 Author Share Posted July 11, 2005 Martin has gone poll crazy! Put me down for a cool 107... now I'm embarrassed. 107 is just too silly. Do you think we should discard these polls, Severian? I dont have any further ones in mind, but I personally think the ones we have are fairly interesting. What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 11, 2005 Author Share Posted July 11, 2005 Severian, I have to go out, be back later. It might be good to close this poll and let it go dormant (we can dig it up later). Let me know if you have any preference. that goes for everybody else who participated. Shall we close this one and leave it on the shelf until Jan 2006? or leave it open for people to ask questions, discuss the topic etc. if they want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Severian Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 No, I was serious! Cosmology is entering a new phase. They have now done the basic stuff and will, on the next round of things, need to introduce some precision which means calculating loops. I reckon there will be a lot of cosmology papers with loops soon, although they may not be LQG. Actually, the 'quantum' might scupper my 107 since I am relying on them not all being LQG, but if you look at your links there are quite a few in there which are not LQG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 If no one objects I would like to leave the poll open some more. People who predicted ranges (like 40-49) please consider narrowing it down to one number. mine was just going to be 49, but just posting "49" was too short a reply to be accepted by the VB code thingy. so I thought I`de hedge my bets at the same time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 12, 2005 Author Share Posted July 12, 2005 Oh thanks YT, more fun if people guess specific numbers. I think I will redo the list and order it by size of estimate, so that Severian gets to be at the top. I'm thinking it may be time to put a lock on this thread, since we already have a fair bunch of guesses. Guesser keyword Loop+Quantum+Cosmology papers on arxiv in 2005 Severian 107 Spyman 55 MacSwell 53 YT2095 49 me 46 Range estimates: luc 40-49 Yourda 40-49 here is the link that gives 2005 to date, of papers with keywords loop+quantum+cosmology in their title or abstract summary http://arxiv.org/find/grp_physics/1/abs:+AND+Cosmology+AND+Loop+Quantum/0/1/0/2005/0/1 I want to mention again that this search picks up some stray "imposter" papers that happen to have all three keywords in their summary abstract at the beginning, even though aren't technically LQC papers. THAT'S OK, we are forecasting the number of papers the search engine picks up. I dont want to have to read each paper to see if it meets some set of "genuine loop quantum cosmology" criteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted July 12, 2005 Share Posted July 12, 2005 Thread "Locked" as requested. if you need to make changes, PM one of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts