17 minutes ago, interested said:

Clearly you think my questions are bollocks. Straw man someone else.

No. You are not reading what people say to you (or not understanding it). I wasn't talking about questions. I was talking about your repeated CLAIMS (e.g. that entanglement could be explained by a fourth dimension). These are just random stuff you make up with no basis in science.

I am quite happy with your questions and will attempt to answer them if I think I have something useful to add. As such, I would prefer it if you stuck to asking questions instead of making outrageous claims.

On 1/20/2018 at 1:53 PM, Strange said:

No. You are not reading what people say to you (or not understanding it). I wasn't talking about questions. I was talking about your repeated CLAIMS (e.g. that entanglement could be explained by a fourth dimension). These are just random stuff you make up with no basis in science.

I am quite happy with your questions and will attempt to answer them if I think I have something useful to add. As such, I would prefer it if you stuck to asking questions instead of making outrageous claims.

This link is quite good, it explains a few things ref entanglement and non locality which I  may have confused. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1402/1402.4764.pdf