Originally posted by Michael F. D.

Is this a casual coincidence, that object having greater energy has a greater time of existence or life? I think that is not. The value TC of object defines its energy.

Its energy decreases with reduction of TC.

So, where the time is directed ?

 

it is not the case that an object with greater energy will live longer at all.

Originally posted by Radical Edward

 

it is not the case that an object with greater energy will live longer at all.

The nucleus of atom has a greater energy and , accordingly, the greater time of existence. All other the more complex objects are a systems which unites atoms. The relationships in these system are weak and time of their existence can be small.

Originally posted by Michael F. D.

The nucleus of atom has a greater energy and , accordingly, the greater time of existence. All other the more complex objects are a systems which unites atoms. The relationships in these system are weak and time of their existence can be small.

 

an isolated neutron is heavier than an isolated proton, however isolated neutrons have a half life of 15 minutes, wheras isolated protons have a very long half life indeed.

The idea of a Time Cycle adds nothing to physics as current laws and observations adequately explain every event you've drawn reference to. Plus Rad E is perfectly correct when he says that its not the case at all that 'higher energy means a longer existence' which is grandoise, sweaping non-explained statement in the first place.

Originally posted by greg1917

The idea of a Time Cycle adds nothing to physics as current laws and observations adequately explain every event you've drawn reference to. Plus Rad E is perfectly correct when he says that its not the case at all that 'higher energy means a longer existence' which is grandoise, sweaping non-explained statement in the first place.

Robert Burns:

 

Whence we came? Where we leave?

A death leers in a birth already

 

I don't guarantee the literal accuracy in quote, but a meaning is valid.

What he had meant ?

"Someone saying something I don't remember about the nature of human existence makes theory X correct".

 

Why are you quoting Burns at me? Am I supposed to recite Dostoyevsky or Tolstoy in return?

Originally posted by greg1917

Why are you quoting Burns at me? Am I supposed to recite Dostoyevsky or Tolstoy in return?

Because the great poets and writers much more finely perceives our world. Their philosophical assotiations much closer to realities, than all an academic investigations.

His the words are just caused for the delight in my soul, finally. They are assonant at my thoughts.

I'll translate his thoughts on a language of physicists.

He has said, that since a moment of appearance in realities of a certain object , the countdown of time of its existence (TC) begins.

Originally posted by Michael F. D.

Because the great poets and writers much more finely perceives our world. Their philosophical assotiations much closer to realities, than all an academic investigations.

His the words are just caused for the delight in my soul, finally. They are assonant at my thoughts.

I'll translate his thoughts on a language of physicists.

He has said, that since a moment of appearance in realities of a certain object , the countdown of time of its existence (TC) begins.

 

Sorry, poetry does not equal physics

 

Just because someone has a way with words and a vast imagination doesn't mean they in any way qualified as an example to explain scientific concepts.

Thats utterly ridiculous and spectacularly random.

 

Not only does the poem have NOTHING to do with the time cycle theory you are talking about, but it is to do with emotion which is a far cry from physics which is devoid of such human concepts. You cant translate poetry into physics any more than you can try and paint a fresco with rocks and a hangover.

Originally posted by Radical Edward

 

an isolated neutron is heavier than an isolated proton, however isolated neutrons have a half life of 15 minutes, wheras isolated protons have a very long half life indeed.

The nucleus of atom contains the bounded protrons and neutrons. The characteristic of complex object is not just an amount of characteristics of the component objects. This already other object with the other characteristic

Originally posted by greg1917

Thats utterly ridiculous and spectacularly random.

 

Not only does the poem have NOTHING to do with the time cycle theory you are talking about, but it is to do with emotion which is a far cry from physics which is devoid of such human concepts. You cant translate poetry into physics any more than you can try and paint a fresco with rocks and a hangover.

Why no? It is possible to consider the poem as the reliable observation of nature. It not worse than observations which made with microscope, for instance. The birth and death this a most conclusive evidences of existence of the cycles of time for all objects.

Poetry has no place in the scientific method.

 

End of story.

 

Any more claims that it can and I'll lock this thread too.

Originally posted by Michael F. D.

It is possible to consider the poem as the reliable observation of nature.

 

No it isn't.

Originally posted by Radical Edward

It makes you wonder if he did actually have a solution though. How big is Wiles'? I only saw the program on TV about it, and he was working on it for quite a while, so I imagine it must have been quite substantial.

 

It was split into two papers, the main one was about 135 pages from what I remember, and the smaller one wasn't very long, but the major one depended upon it.

 

As for the rest of the thread; this is probably why I don't read pseudoscience apart from when I'm bored :\

Originally posted by dave

As for the rest of the thread; this is probably why I don't read pseudoscience apart from when I'm bored :\

 

I just read whatever's on the front page.

Originally posted by Sayonara³

Poetry has no place in the scientific method.

 

End of story.

 

Any more claims that it can and I'll lock this thread too.

Seems, you want to make the collection of my topics (I see at first, that my topics are settles down in Pseudoscience & Metaphysics.) . Well, we'll leave the poetry at rest. Then all of dividends will be my.

I expect of disclaimers of my point stated in original thread. So?