robomont

is it one of the symbols at the bottom of post area? http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t522/robomont/2013-04-29_084013_zpsb939f55e.jpg http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t522/robomont/2013-04-29_083549_zps4a3d7185.jpg http://i1312.photobucket.com/albums/t522/robomont/2013-04-29083559_zps7f3b7cbc.jpg

how do i post photobucket.yes i got pics

thats why time travel shouldnt be real.because at minumum the planet would have to be in the exact spot in the universe.otherwise a person who time travelled would pop out in deep space after traveling.unless the time machine had a way to arch over to the planets new location.

yes we know moon rocks are extremely rare.thats why we want an exact method of verification.step by step. we are considering doing a mass spec on some dust and we are considering cutting a slice on one.any suggestion? there are two moon rocks found on earth that have been scientifically verified.so yes it is possible.a impact on the moon can expel rocks that end up on earth.very rare but not impossible.

we originally thought they were meteorites until we washed them off.then we compared them to pics and the only thing that was visually comparable was moon rocks.then we saw the value of moon rocks and our jaws dropped.we arent taking any chances with them yet.there is no meteorite pic on the net that even comes close.

we were digging a new fill line and about two feet down in untouched soil.a year ago.three witnesses.

please mods put this in the right place as i dont no where to place. my friend may actuall have two moon rocks.we have both looked at every photo we could find of meteors and moon rocks and this just may be the real deal. what are the exact steps to go about verification.if they are real then the value could be around a million $.so he wants to make sure.this is not a joke. we have some photos of them but they are not highly detailed.phone camera. thankyou for your time.we live in northeast texas for reference of closest lab or what not.

i live on the conspiracy sights as yall ptobably figured out and heres what i bring for your viewing pleasure. supposedly the grand canyon was caused by a super giant lightning bolt.i laughed then thought.what if an ionized cloud got between earth and another planet or earth and the sun.would the difference between charge to mass ratios of planets cause an arc of plasma between them .would this change the orbits or extincion event from dust cloud.is any of this possible?

i would say there are two electrons being exactly the same somewhere in the universe.the quantities of said object have to be so large for probability to work. since space has boundaries there is limits to probabilities.but if it was infinite then there are infinite possibilities. is that close? i would say there are two electrons being exactly the same somewhere in the universe.the quantities of said object have to be so large for probability to work. since space has boundaries there is limits to probabilities.but if it was infinite then there are infinite possibilities. is that close? i would say there are two electrons being exactly the same somewhere in the universe.the quantities of said object have to be so large for probability to work. since space has boundaries there is limits to probabilities.but if it was infinite then there are infinite possibilities. is that close?

thankyou for that explanation.very understandable. will let my mind rest on this to let it soke in. ill be back.

ok.so the frame dragging is making it look like a hole? im greatful for your opinion and its changing mine.its just to wrap my mind around the void part in the center.the rest of you say seems resonable.but if no energy is escaping then the energy is concentrating in this hole.if so then if a blackhole doesnt die then eventually all gets swallowed up and compressed.there has to be a fundimental law that stops and reverses this law or else the universe would have been swallowed up eons ago? could the bh be a massive bundle of higgs particles.or some particle at an even higher energy level?

thankyou mike.very much.i am going to check these things out over the next few days.even if they arent high enough .just you putting in the effort to help me : )

i decided to "speculate about an engine design i believe is functional and possibly being used on craft. the design is the medical caduceus coil.the indian vedas called it the mercury motor.i have no proof of them both being the same thing but when you add in the rumors of the military tr3b having a mercuryvplasma engine it starts to make sense. the idea is to have a iron tubing apparatus with liquid mercury inside. a hot plate is mounted on bottom.the mercury is boiled until it is plasma.the plasma goes to the top ball and ionizes the air.some of the plasma pours over into the coil winding and creates a magnetic solenoid.the solenoid then pulls the ionized air down and under the craft.this provides thrust.it also creates a plasma around the craft.this plasma also creates a kind of shield around the craft protecting it from debree.as long as there are atoms around the craft that can be ionized then there is propulsion.the voltage determines the speed and current is set to match weight of craft.but in my design its self regulated.only more heat is applied to boiler.to increase lift or speed.in an electronic version of this engine the speed could be increased up to the limit of ionization and magnetic field strength. the energy to move the craft should be about the same anywhere but gravity would effect it some and viscosity of substance it was in. therevis video of a tr3b having a glowing orb surrounding it.then later the orb expands to encompass the entire ship. this would be the plasma i talk of.this same glowing orb phenomena has been seen through time and is even shown in paintings of ancient.the plasma orb tends to be multi colored like what happens to air when it is ionized with each element creating a color because of its electron shells.like neon does.so by deduction.these craft could be thousands of years old.just as the indian vedas have been dated at over four thousand years old.which means the mercury engine design has been around a long time.it may even be possible to cycle the plasma at a frequency that makes the craft invisible to the human eye.it also may be possible to use it create a cloud around the craft.the bible talks of the jews following a cloud by day and fire by night.the hible is also thousands of years old. what do yall think of my speculation?could this be space propulsion?do you think the usa gov has this tech.does this mean we regularly travel in space?what would be the top speed of this engine in outer space?

so are you saying the xrays shoot up into space then make a u turn and get sucked back in at the edge of the disk? that would make sense to me.but what is in the hollow eye?the void of the vortex.in a tornado or hurricane there is still air.would there be vacuum of space?would it be calm or safe to be in that area.is gravity nullified in that area due to some physics law im unaware of.

i am offended that the mods do not accept ufo research as a mainstream science.i think townsend brown.if he were alive .would disagree with this viewpoint. his techpatents and contract military career should be evidence enough of validity. if im banned so be it.its been fun and thankyou for your time.

im willing to accept that but it doesnt explain the void perpedicular to the hole itself. am i missing something in this description.why can we see the eye of the blackhole.shouldnt it be covered in mass being sucked in.is it this mass that allows us to see the eye.does it distort the hole and make it visibly bigger than it really is.why is there a plain to bh.why doesnt it suck from all directions. unless there is a physics law that overrides gravity.and forces this powerful entity to conform? if light must conform to the laws of gravity what laws does gravity conform to? who does gravity answer to? my speculation is it conforms to an energy of a higher voltage rating than can be sustained in the bh.could the bh hold a mass of higgs particles? curious minds want to know.

i was working at eglin airforce base.building the observation tower next to the rocket track used to test bunker busters.a physicist was asked by the electrician if lightning could be stored.he said no. i stated that lightning can be stored in a pure water capacitor under five atmospheres of pressure.his jaw dropped. the physicist was responsible for lightning arresting ? he ask how i knew such things being a tower hand and i told him i study high energy physics in my spare time.that was 1998.

i maxxed out letourno universities library and my local junior college.i found more practical knowledgevin a childrens book"home made lightning"than any book i have found anywhere else on the subject.i actually checked out a book from new york on time that hadnt been checked out since 1930.that books info was what i used to put an airforce physicist in check with.i havent tried to learn much more on the subject because i gave up trying to find it.most everything these days is math gobligoop.i would like to find resources but havent been shown a path to go towards.the closest that comes is those dummies books that are not in depth.if you know of some that would help or free knowledge in that field im all ears.

i dont need to understand automobiles but i can buy a chilton and repair one.i dont need to know biology to breath.expensive specialty science books holds back the flow of knowledge.and after reading i may still not have the answer im looking for.im not against people specializing but dont be a snob with the info.be patient and cooperative.because without the little guys dream.the scientist will not have a job.it takes both in symbiosis.imho.plus a kind of physics tree should be built.with each formula branching into the next higher level of formula.so a laymen can easily follow the path he needs.like a repair manual of sorts. sometimes i wonder if science strips the imagination.while i believe everything is possible to some degree.its the two sides of a diagonal ladder.that we climb together.for the hope of all.

i can give you a perfect example.teslas ideas are still not talked about in high school.all high voltage experiments are rellegated to a small amount of universities.most all physics is in theoretical or closer to home problems.war machines and such.for a hundred years high voltage ac and dc has been shoved in a corner. next.you guys dont speak in country english.this gap makes it hard for the rest of us to keep up.you provide no real framework for the common man.in return this causes detachment between the two.like all the different ways of explaining an amount of energy.with all the genius in science we cant come up with one standard for all to use.but we are expected to trust your theories that sound like utter nonsense to the masses. imho physics should be taught in all grade levels.with working prototypes of hypothesis. we do not deny a person the right to buy a car even though they may not know how to repair it.why should we deny knowledge to those who dont understand the math? i for one have no formal training in physics but i called no such thing as an absolute vacuum before scientist proved it.my gut told me so.now i wouldnt have bet the farm on it though.the majority of physicist werent even speculating on it but this hick was.ive spent time with a nasa physicist that couldnt answer half my questions even though he understood what i was asking. i came up with a way to cut down flyash pollution at coal fired power plants that is now used at all of them across the nation after being at my job at one for three months.simple but brilliant.and i was never paid a dime. i have invented faster safer and more efficient ways of doing things at almost all the jobs ive ever had and then quit .as i get bored quickly.ive been a high voltage mining equipment builder even though i have no formal training.ive been an air conditioning tech for five years with no formal training.ive been a tower hand building microwave and cellphone sites.no formal training.i repair my own car.even a transmission once.no formal training.i am one of the best gardeners you ever saw.no formal training. and ive put many a physicist in there place over high voltage theory.because i had the drive to learn.this is what accademia doesnt want to admit.there are smart people out there that have never set foot in a college.it would discredit them to admit that knowledge is free.if you have the drive.of which i do.thats why i dont have a problem being called a dummy.been called it my whole life.but im the guy who is retired at forty.and can fix most of my stuff.can academia do better? i wonder as i ponder.

i may be at rest inside the craft but my craft isnt at rest.to all the other atoms outside the craft my craft is just another atom.please explain?

although i have only msm pictures of a blackhole and accretion disk.and theories from yall as to there being nothing that can esxape a blackhole.the pics show a column of xrays and gamma coming off the edge of the disk.this means there is nothing there.there is no such thing as nothing.there has to be something inside this column.what is it and how far does it extend from the center.logic says it should beca giant toilet drain for the galaxy but visually nothing is there.am i correct in that theory?

i prefer to not be distracted by insults or compliments but to stay focussed on the task at hand. i forgot that some folks resort to name calling when answers elude them. the higher iq of us call that comment sarcasm.but thankyou sheldon for the effort. Taking all callers that wish to challenge my observations? and thankyou to the folks who are willing to share their viewpoints and math.

so if i have a space ship travelling at a certain speed then it has a certain kenetic energy or mass.if im travelling fast enough then my spacecraft turns into a blackhole?

ill take that as a compliment : ) my apoligies on using the term black hole.the accretion disk is the more proper term but to be fair.stephen hawkings nor any of yall can define what makes up the mass of a blackhole or how it will die or live.you cant explain the edge of the universe either.i have more questions than yall have answers so i show my intelligence through challenging yalls. to steven hawkings.i wont my money refunded on the purchase of that crap book and a letter of apology for the waisted time of reading it. which proves im not a crank.but somebody who cares about accurate physics info. i have no problem having my theories torn apart but so far the entire theory has not been shredded.only a small part. SO IS THAT THE BEST YOU CAN DO ? and if nothing can escape then why isnt there a tornado vortex at the center of the bh instead of a column of nothing surrounded by xrays and gamma rays.what is inside that column?possibly another em of even higher voltage.an em that we dont recognize .that is not affected by gravity? maybe its filled with hawking radiation.that stuff seems to be hiding everywhere.