Strange

In my tests of parallel circuitry just now, with 12 resistors, it seems that each resistor in parallel with each other resistor in the circuit was having the exact same amps as the input amperage

Can you explain how you determined the current in each resistor?

 

And a resistor LED measured at 150 kohms

An LED is not a resistor. It has a non-linear voltage-current curve so the measured "resistance" will depend on the applied voltage.

 

lit up, parallel with 11 resistors with resistances between 100 ohms and 8 kohms.

The LED will light if there is sufficient voltage across it. You don't give enough information to say whether this is expected or not.

Can you explain what you mean; you question isn't very clear.

I assume "Engineering Math" means the mathematics used in engineering. But what is "Engineering Physic"?

In my tests of parallel circuitry just now, with 12 resistors, it seems that each resistor in parallel with each other resistor in the circuit was having the exact same amps as the input amperage

Can you explain how you determined this.

And a resistor LED measured at 150 kohms

I'm not sure what you mean by "a resistor LED" but you can't measure the resistance of an LED with a meter. It has a non-linear voltage-current relationship (i.e. it is not a resistor) and so the measured resistance will depend on the voltage.

lit up, parallel with 11 resistors with resistances between 100 ohms and 8 kohms.

As long as there is still sufficient voltage across the diode, it will light up. You don't provide enough detail of your set up to comment any further.

It's as if the very resistance itself was being negated as a concept in this circuit.

It sounds more like you don't fully understand what is happening.

 

There would be more that simply rely on relativity being correct.

As does much modern technology. Most modern semiconductors are now at the point where quantum effects need to be taken itno account in the design of manufacturing processes and the design of the individual components (transistors, LEDs, wiring, etc) on the chip. If quantum theory were wrong it would be very obvious. And this depends on SR being correct.

Is there a link to those 100 experiments on Einstein? I only found a page with about 25, and they all seemed to be different versions of the exact same experiment.

And Wikipedia has like 4 more, but they seem to be explainable by alternative means.

Some may be different versions of the same basic idea in order to eliminate other possible explanations, or to increase the accuracy.

There are also many thousands of tests which are equivalent to directly testing SR, for example tests of Lorentz invariance. Some of these have been done to extraoridinary levels of accuracy.

Because it has a protective layer of aluminium oxide, which is not soluble in nitric acid. This is, in general, why aluminium is resistant to furtehr oxidation or other forms of corrosion.

Don't thank me, thank Google! (I had forgotten the lunar caustic name completely)

"It was once called lunar caustic because silver was called luna by the ancient alchemists, who believed that silver was associated with the moon."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_nitrate

We would need to take a gluon 'strand,' and then add electrons to be excited and move around the neutrons.

What is a "gluon strand"? Why would electrons move around neutrons or gluons when they are both electrically neutral?

Your idea starts out wrong and goes downhill from there.