photon propeller

I would assert a more analogous description of insight into religious system analysis.

The universal connectivity of energy has already been proved by science. The only question that remains is, what is the source? If the source is God, which I believe it is, then in reality we are all truly pantheists. Goethe stated it clearly, "The whole is greater than the sum total of the parts." I would only add, some parts are greater than others.

I dreamed I was aloft in the heavens. Everywhere I looked I saw the magnificent cosmos, yet when I peered upon myself, I saw nothing. I thought, what am I? The many eyes of God. As I looked I also heard. The multitude of acoustical waves were periodically buzzing like the swarming of birds and insects, vibrating my inner core. What am I? The many ears of God. While I looked and heard I also felt. The interfering electromagnetic waves granted not only my sight, but a sense of hot, cold, and pressure. Again I wondered, what am I? The many hands of God. So the fragrant universe surrounded me. Although I maintained all my senses, there was no breath from my lungs nor beating of my heart. I was devoid of my human form, darkness without light, unable to physically alter my environment. I had lost my power of choice. Finally I realized what I was. I was the spirit of man, pure energy, the essence of God. I waited eons for my chance to manifest in human form, my chance to choose how I'd alter my surroundings. I suddenly awoke from my dream. I was alive and born of light. My time is now and I will not forsake it. I am man. I am the vessel of God.

How about taking advantage of a bad situation by changing the focus to the value of life and the reality that it is finite. Time should not be wasted or taken for granted, whether or not heaven exists or doesn't. Imagine all of the eternal energy of the universe awaiting just the right circumstances and the timely process to manifest itself as a living being, would it take life for granted wasting its precious little time or would it reach for the source? We should inspire our children to do just that.

Centripetal and centrifugal forces arise from the intrinsic geometrodynamics of spacetime. The geon is the "gravitational electromagnetic entity" in which the energy flow(field lines and their associated directions) of gravitational and electromagnetic force is described.

"Thus all philosophy is like a tree, of which metaphysics is the root, physics the trunk, and all other sciences the branches that grow out of the trunk, which are reduced to three principal, namely medicine, mechanics, and ethics. By the science of morals, I understand the highest and most perfect which, presupposing an entire knowledge of the other sciences, is the last degree of wisdom" Rene Descartes

"Just so long as man looks for the God-force outside nature and outside of himself, just so long as he bows in fear to the personal deity of his early inheritance, he will be the slave of his own imaginings." Walter Russell

E=hv. an electron and positron annihilate to form a gamma photon. gamma photon is absorbed then emitted as radio photon. both are still combinations of e and b fields, one less energetic than the other. 2 oscillating point vectors represent each field and a single point vector represents the axis. Do these field vectors not act like point particles that transverse the axis and rotate with it? Do their relative positions at the wavefront not change as the wave propagates? Isnt the vector information converted to raster format,(rasterization), converting the visual image to an electrical stream of proportional intensities? (TV)Doesnt the variance of these point vectors, with each frame, outline the image(information) transported?

sure it does. amplitude changes as it oscillates (e&b field strength varies)from the inertial line to its maximum. The manipulation of that maximum is the basis of modulation for am signals. That is how a carrier wave transports information. Frequency may also be modulated as in the case of fm signals. If an electron and positron represent these fields within the photon, and adding more electrons in phase modulates the amplitude, how can you believe nothing physically travels the curved path? What paths do the electron and positron follow? What are the dynamics of their motion which propels the photon linearly?

"Reality cannot be found accept in one single source because of the interconnection of all things with one another. I do not conceive of any reality at all without genuine unity." Gottfried Leibniz 1670

The only addition to the reality of nature that I imply is a definition of its source, that source defined as the creator, the master. The proportion of knowledge we unveil is relative to the amount of time we have to do so. We must work together,and allow science to resolve the mysteries, while keeping faith in the source of the mystery itself.

On the contrary, my belief, my religion, and my God, are exactly that. I believe a creator is self evident in the nature of creation itself. One who's natural constants are the universal law. I humbly kneel at the source.

Doesnt any change, including varying field strength, produce a trail of information? Does that trail equate to the production of information? Is it that information may be produced faster but not transported faster than c? How does the image,( the information transported), relate to the relevant point wavefront positions? Does the change in amplitude contribute to a change in the topography of the wavefront? Hence, is the information produced by the change in amplitude simultaneously revealed at and as the wavefront propagates?

If religion was redefined as the search for knowledge and God was defined as the total of knowledge, epistemology would unify religions, all priests would be scientists, and the one truth would be sequentially revealed.

So in the case of the photon, in place of the cable we have its axis, the straight line, which is traveling linearly at light speed. Keeping in mind nothing happens faster than c. Yet in a circularly polarized photon, e and b fields are transversing and rotating around their axis as the fields relative point positions at the wavefront also transverse and rotate. If their common axis point at the wavefront is moving linearly forward at light speed, how do the relative field points keep up?

correct, current flows as slow as syrup but the associated em energy flows at light speed. In the case of the photon, what are the dynamics of field position relative to the axis? Are particle representatives present and oscillating about the axis as the photon propagates? Or are fields merely oscillating and the particles are existent only in the form of energy not matter?

If a dc current (electrons) moves straight from point a to b at light speed, how does the magnetic field, which spirals around it, produce a spiral line as fast as a straight line. Wouldn't it would require the spiral to be produced faster than the straight line as in the above scenario? Are the spirals falling behind at the rate difference? Is space time compressing longitudinally as frequency goes up and rarefacting as it drops ? Is the coin a ww2 era one cent ceylon?

The curved path is the surface of the water. Do the fields themselves not travel the curved path, or their associated particles? If light moves linearly forward at light speed, how can its path oscillate without an increase in speed? The rate of change by the fields is the curved path plus the linear distance.The second number is the associated speed increase is found by 3.14/2 = x/c. 282,820-186,000=95,820.

Per first bit, close answer, sphere one has to travel 5.7 mph faster. Per second bit, wavelength is measured straight across from peak to peak, not along the curve of the wavelength itself as the curved path of the oscillating fields. frequency x wavelength =c.The rate of change in amplitude follows the curved path as the wavefront moves straight forward at c. Change is occurring at the curved rate plus the linear speed. .57 times faster than c. This should require proportionally the same difference in speed as the above problem. Meaning the curved path of oscillation should require a speed increase of 95,820 mph to keep pace in the same time period.

Are religion and epistemology intrinsically linked?

If sphere 1 and 2 are an electron and positron, their rest mass is converted to energy when they annihilate, becoming the photon, which travels at light speed. So it follows one can accelerate to light speed if one's mass is completely converted to energy. The underlying paradox concerning this example is that sphere 1 can reconcile the necessary speed difference until sphere 2 reaches light speed. Even if they both travel at light speed, the curved path of sphere 1 prevents it from keeping pace with sphere 2.

Two spheres of equal size, starting at the same position A, take to different paths to the same destination B. The path of sphere 1 is curved. It is two perfect semicircles. The path of sphere 2 is a straight line. Sphere 2 travels at 10 mph. How much faster does sphere 1 have to travel in order to arrive at point b within the same time period as sphere 2? If sphere 1 and 2 simultaneously accelerate to light speed, is it possible for sphere 1 to keep up with sphere 2? If electric and magnetic fields are oscillating on curved paths orthogonal to the direction of propagation, how do they reconcile the necessary difference in speed needed to keep up with the wavefront moving linearly at light speed?

I agree with you Swansont. My intentions were not to re-introduce a topic but to show a pattern of bias. Next time I will keep those examples on topic. The topic here is supposed to be the meaning of life and how it relates to a creator.

you inferred an incorrect definition of soapboxing, as if it did not include discussion. Although not a religious topic, the association of the value of n(principal quantum number) and electron shell as an energy level is real. The bohr model is outdated and does not include wave partical duality as atomic orbitals do adding to 3 more quantum numbers to n to describe the specific symmetry of electron configuration. The value of n may theoretically be much greater than 7 but for every known element it is 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. 7 specific energy levels with discrete frequency values. Coincidence? unlikely. Interesting how the distance between those levels follows a harmonic series like the fundamental wave. As the distance from the nucleus grows the distance between levels shrinks at a proportion of 7 to 1, just as wavelength shrinks as frequency rises maintaining a product of light speed. If you know of an element that exceeds this provide it. Sure, all you have to do is ignore the "woo words." The idea is that there is no empty space, everything is connected, and that all the fields are simultaneously interacting. The "woo words" are a figurative description of an image of that interaction.

It is the total of simultaneously interacting, superimposed, electric, magnetic, gravitational, and quantum vacuum subfields. It is the everturning kaleidoscope, complexing as it turns.