Ophiolite

You may believe yourself to be creative. All I see is undisciplined mind farts. All the great thinkers have combined imagination with critical thinking. Thus far you have failed to demonstrate you have a horse in either race.

Debris left in orbit between the Moon and Earth may have taken a while to fall either into the Moon or Earth; maybe it orbited for a while before landing.

The impact pretty well volatalised eveything that went into orbit. Anything falling back to earth, fell back essentially instantaneously.

I don't believe in panspermia because abiogenesis on this earth is proven to be possible.

Panspermia rises a lot more questions.

Abiogenesis on Earth has certainly not been proven to be possible. Panspermia neatly answers the question of why life appeared so soon on the planet, yet it took another 2 1/3 billion years to evolve metazoans, a much simpler step than the one from non-life to life.

Before puberty everybody is able to cope with his/her questions.

If this is so, why are some prepubescent children deeply troubled?

Post puberty a new dimension is added to the child. He is drawn out(???) and begins to know the world with his senses.

What?!? Are you using "senses" as a euphimism for sexual awakening? That is the only explanation I can imagine. If you mean this literally it is simply wrong.

His appetite for experiences increases.

Please provide (several) citations to justify this incorrect statement.

His expectations are through a viel of intimacy. When they are not met he/she cannot cope as he/she would have pre puberty period.

I assume you meant veil, but even with that correction this makes no sense. Intimacy involves the removal of the figurative veil and thus there is no veil of intimacy.

Does your gender reality cloud your judgement?

That appears to be a non-sequitur.

the behavior of blast or explosion or bang in universe is traditionally. after blast debris shoots away from center and then at a point they start revolving around the center of explosion where already a powerful black whole controls.

if universe is expanding away after big bang ( we are in this phase) its mean next phase will be the stop expansion and the galaxies will pull toward center of big bang , and in 3rd phase galaxies will start revolving around a giant black whole in the center of universe.

The Big Bang was not a blast, nor an explosion. You are imagining a catchy analogy is an accurate scientific description. It isn't.

There is no centre to the "explosion".

There is no evidence that the universe is revolving.

There is no evidence of a "central" black hole.

Current evidence suggests the expansion will not reverse.

Volatile elements, including water, were largely lost from the ejected material from which the moon was formed. This is natural and expected.

A small proportion of the water on the Earth is likely derived from dehydration of the mantle. Unlike the water in the ejected material that formed the moon, depth of burial and gravity kept that mantle water available.

The bulk of the water on the earth is derived, as you noted, from asteroids, or comets, or both. The moon and the Earth would have received similar amounts, in proportion to their size. The lower gravitational attraction of the moon, however, meant that its water was lost to space. Rather than calling the impact theory into question, the absence of any significant volume of water on the moon is one of the facts that led to and support that theory.

You have provided a considerable amount of detail. Unfortunately, the number and density of the trees prevent me from figuring out whether I am in a forest, a lumberyard, or a furniture store. This is largely due, I am sure, to my own limited experience in the fields you have touched on. A concise summary of your central point would be useful, not only to me, but perhaps to others also.

I meant animal dominance, similar to top of the pecking order.

Yes, as I noted I broadly agree. If gorillas and cattle and tree shrews could discuss the matter I think they might agree with the OP that we are not animals, but insist we be classified as parasites.

Has anybody calculated to what distance a supermassive black hole`s reach is as far as it`s event horizon on out? No they haven`t ...

Really? You appear to be suggesting that not only does the gravitational pull of an object fall of with the cube of the distance, but that at some point it simply disappears completely. I repeat a point-of-information: I am crap at physics, but your apparent assertion here just seems to be wrong. And since the only thing required to assess the "reach" of a black hole is its mass, then I think you will find it has been calculated many times.

Mike, I am struck by the thought that you are, with great inventiveness and imagination, seeking to answer questions in much the way the Greek philosophers did. They had some remarkable insights, but got a great deal wrong. Now, armed only with that imagination and a scattering of pop-science ideas, you are trying to offer solutions to problems that no longer exist. Science has already found the answers. It is frustrating to watch all this, even painful. Would it not make sense to improve your foundations, before you try to create soaring skyscrapers?

We are the dominant species on Earth. We use sonar, radar, airplanes, and other technology to do things we do not possess inherently. With communication, organization, and technology, we can and are destroying species after species. These things do not make us better, just more powerful; in fact, one can argue that power corrupts, and is therefore bad. Sometimes our actions are inhumane, and can be as ruthless as any predator, like a cat playing with prey before killing it. In my opinion, we are more super animal than non animal.

Ed, you have inherited a +1 which I did not intend to give. I was going for the Quote button. . However, I'm sure I've failed to vote on posts of yours that did deserve it, so have that one on me.

Since the comparison in this thread is with animals, I presume you mean we are the dominant animal species on the planet. Given that rats are members of a number of species I shall reluctantly give you that. If you meant dominant species I there are a host of microbial species that would disagree with you. Indeed I am host to a number of such species.

I should have tracked the number of times on many forums I have felt constrained to say that I know almost no physics, but I damn well no bullshit when I see it. Tom, you have a bunch of people giving you excellent advice, showing you your errors and trying to guide you. However, in your arrogance, or stupidity (you decide which) you ignore it all and sail on with even more nonsense. Please stop it. Just because you were also a lifeguard is no reason for me to give you an easy time. Your posting content does not merit that.

I guess you see little value here but I will attempt to correlate this with my assertions with greater logic

Frankly, it would be a great improvement if you were to use proper English. You know, the kind that involves more than juxtaposing a range of words that relate to important concepts in such a way that, to the inexperienced eye, they seem to convey something profound.

You may be a knock down, totally decent guy who is kind to small children and animals, and loves his grandma, but boy you don't half post a bunch of meaningless gibberish. I repeat my advice - get a proper education.

3) An assumption of mine is that light, energy and gravity share properties unknown yet to man on a quantum and grand scale.

An assumption of mine is that you would be better off if you were to avoid wild-assed speculations and get a proper education.

The difference between these two assumptions is that there is evidence to support mine.

(Membership and Lurkers: if you have not read the Voynitch manuscript thread you will not be aware the justification of my rather curt response to Tom.)

Without the sun there goes gravity! Without its gravity Earth would become a rogue planet. That means that it would perhaps be gravitationally caught in another star's orbit, plunge into it, or else travel forever in the frigid vastness of space.

The last option is by far the most likely and what this thread is about: could the internal heat of the planet, derived from the kinetic energy of construction and radioactivity, possibly supplemented by tidal heating if it has a moon, be sufficient to provide an environment suitable for life.

A couple of questions:

What is the current greatest depth (not length) of tunnel that has been achieved with the present generation of tunneling machines?

Would you explain what you mean by "For injecting the water in the hot rocks there is no water pump necessary, because the tunnel brings the low air pressure to the rocks below. There is building up a low-pressure zone in the rocks surrounding the tunnel or shaft."

If the tunnel contains low pressure and the rocks, high pressure the flow will be in the opposite direction to the one you desire.The only way the a low-pressure can "build up" in the rocks, is by the escape of fluid from them.

Have you done a cost estimate of such a project and contrasted it with the expected power generation and value?

Is the tunnel lined, and if so how, or are you relying upon the natural strength of the native rock?

Dear all,

 

I have an idea to research indirect interactions of publishing affiliations - like are they competing or collaborating basing on their authors publications.

 

Can you please tell me are there any instruments to do that?

Or is there anybody interested in such research?

 

Regards,

Me

I am guessing English is your second language, so your question is not entirely clear. This is how I understand it:

You wish to explore the way in publishers interact with each other indirectly. In other words you are not concerned with formal agreements that may exist between publishers, but rather the way their actions are influenced by the responses in the market. As an example you say you might consider the extent to which publishers compete or collaborate with each other, based upon an examination of the work of their authors.

Do I have that more or less right? It seems rather vague. That probably reflects my understanding.

He has, however succeeded in making Republicans look bad for backing him, Democrats look bad for getting in the 'mud' to fight him, and all of America look bad for taking him seriously.

Excellent summary.

I don't see what your going on about. It's not nonsense. In fact, I have made greater sense of the voynich manuscript than in all ages. The fact that the script uses 3 evident numbers which I have equated to their equals and the Pi glyph which I represent as 3 does not not seem so mysterious that numerology would be in use here. You are drawing conclusions with no sound evidence that my method is incorrect.

Tom, please sit down, if you are not already sitting and ****ing pay attention. YOU HAVE NOT EXPLAINED YOUR METHOD.

No matter how much you may believe you have done so, you have not. Your method is obscure to us. Your attempts to explain it have obfuscated, not clarified. You need to step through the process step by step, defining every term along the way with maximum precision. If you are unable to do this there are two obvious explanations:

1. You lack the intellect to do so, in which case it is unlikely you have been able to do anything meaningful with the manuscript and you can be safely ignored.

2. You are deliberately trolling in which case you can be safely ignored.

Therefore, if you have any interest in promoting your hypothesis you need to explain it clearly and simply and you need to do so now. If you can't be bothered,then neither can I.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

 

 

https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/145/Proving-Non-Existence

 

 

I'm not just talking about tools, I'm talking about all of the artifacts as a whole.

And yes that is evidence of higher intelligence/behavioral modernity.

Higher intelligence than......?

Tom, thank you for making the effort to explain your method.I believe it was a sincere attempt. Strange's questions, however, demonstrate how it fails totally to constitute an explanation. Frankly I find it ludicrous and a little sad that you think it is a viable explanation. Perhaps you are too close to the problem. I don't know, but at present it remains nonsense.

To play advocate - there is no evidence against it either. It was so long ago it can't be known.

Exactly the point I wished to make. While we recognise that Neanderthals were different from modern humans the differences are not sufficient to argue against the possession of skills such as those I suggested. We cannot know, since those skills leave no record of any kind. While we may construct an argument that suggests it is unlikely, it cannot be ruled out.

Hold on there tiger! All I`m stating is that something in our galaxy caused them to get absurd results ( even with two teams ) in an experiment done. I`m not sure what it is exactly, but I`m sure it has to do with time dilation. Whether through speed or mass. Maybe there`s a small black hole creeping up on us right now...

No, you hold on. You made several other statements which Strange either refuted or questioned you on. These are clearly laid out in post #5. Will you please answer and address these now. Alternatively you can retract each of them, en masse, or individually.

Steve, no one here is out to give you a hard time, but this is a science forum and speculations and hypotheses will be properly subject to close scrutiny. You have made statements that conflict with many observations and with current theory. It behooves you to address questions and refutations made in relation to those statements. It is your statements that are being attacked, not you.

after reading the comments i have figured out how to word myself, i was trying to figure out how to say, I think that people can be classified as something other then animals because we often separate ourselves form animals but in other cases we say we are just like animals.like plants are living things but they are not animals. its kind of a contradiction to have both. we are more aware of the world then animals, bats may have echo location but they are not even comparable when it comes to the amount of information we know about the world, no animal knows that much.

And you continue to look at this from the point of view of humans. Your argument is that humans have characteristics that are absent or poorly developed in other animals and this males us special. Because we are special we should be considered separate for them.

You entirely miss the point that the same argument can be made - and I have made it in relation to bats - about every other animal that would justify them being considered special and therefore separate from other animals.

Look here is the argument again: Bats have superior echo location location to other animals. Humans may know more about the world than any other animal, but they are not even comparable when it comes to echolocation - no animal can do it as well as bats.

That's the same argument you are using for separating humans from animals, but it works just as well to separate bats from animals.

Cro magnon art is obviously proof of advanced complexity/ modern behavior.

Neanderthal's whole culture essentially lacked anything in comparison.

So you reject the possibility that they engaged in complex story telling, choral singing and dance to an equivalent level of the preservable cave paintings. What is your justification for that rejection?

Every:- action, reaction, transmission , travel, effect, movement can ONLY be with its immediate neighbour

No.¹

^Note:

^{1. While this response lacks detailed information, I would argue that its brevity and focus are preferable to another Mike Smith Cosmos ramble. (Sorry Mike.)}