illuusio

And this is currently approved in science world? Keep on rocking!

Actually one experiment failed due to known reasons. I have done numerous tests of my own and I haven't failed yet. Next step is test run in vacuum. Contradicting in what way? What kind of mathematical derivation you do have for Newton's II law? In YOUR physics there is derivation for it, right? Cherry picking, right. What will you say after test ran in vacuum?

Wow! You are very eager to close this thread Haven't you read my theory? If you have, you know that there is math involved. This theory must be eating up you badly.

What is your point? Try to make it short. Not necessary include math. Please, ignore my theory and this topic. You don't have to read this, ok?

Broader theory have to include results of previous theory. Density is kg/m^3

If I remember correctly, even in this Speculations area, there is conversation concerning of existence of ether. I think you can't say that it's proven that there is no ether. Photons hava a mass (tiny one) and ether near large mass bends photons path. Ok, that last part shows me that you didn't understand what you read I hope you take time to really understand that paper. If you don't do it, please, ignore it and ignore this topic.

You are wrong in so many levels dude. First, your gravitation calculations are wrong, you must measure r as distance between mass points, not as distance between surfaces. Second, if you can't understand what (any kind of) movement causes in ether, you are missing a lot in many areas of physics. Third, if you measure GR with for example atom clocks, you will get correct results, but only because atom clocks behave differently in various densities of FTE.

Actually the wall blocked pulling force. I got the effect alright, but I did reruns with better system and there was not good effect. So, yes, Magnus effect can be prevented with wall. ok, about my theory. 1) my theory sure applies to non-rotating objects. Pure movement without rotation causes changes in ether too, of course. According to my theory if there is no rotation or other movements there won't be any pulling force. 2) not with small mass (like bike's wheel). With heavy metal ball "gravity" overcomes air resistance nicely (no need for high rotation frequence). I thought that you got that already, hmm... 3) yes mmm... normal Newton's equation is just fine, you only have to forget the gravitation constant. That constant is actually NOT a constant, it's rotational component of force and it's varies. I got an idea! There is relativily easy and cheap way to prevent asteroid collisions! We just have to put few large rotaing objects into space along asteroids path to make that asteroid's path change Those "rotaters" can be in space permanently and moved to where needed.

Ok, let's try another route. Picture in your mind, that every mass is surrounded by FTEPs. Bigger mass in covered with more FTEP ans so ether is thicker. When two objects rotate or move (in relation to each other), what will happen in ether? Well pressure changes because there is no gravity per se. Can you picture this? Try to be as positive as you can towards the idea and me. Ether density is related to 1/r^2 so would you say that there is any differences when you measure preasure between moving objects compared to preasure behing the objects? Remember the distance r. Can you picture what that preasure difference can do to the objects?

I wouldn't call it gravity, just force induced by rotating object. And card blocked the essential part with pulling force, the Magnus effect. Although air flow overpowered pulling force anyway. I managed to create the effect through artificial wall, but very weak though. I'll do some more testing to check how wall with different kind of material and thickness effects the Magnus effect in ether.

Airflow was blocked as well as Magnus effect. Airflow won Magnus effect. Can you understand at all?

On the Moon there is lower gravity for sure. But calculated weight is derived from Newton's law with G as a constant. Of course rotating object is attracted to the other object. Magnus effect effects both parties. No motion with Cavendish experiment? Que? There is motion alright, incoming larger ball, right? That movement generates activity in ether for sure. Force from air flow was bigger than pulling force. In vacuum that test would work, even with that bike's wheel

Hmm... I did an experiment with the same test object and same drill, BUT this time through ~3mm wall. Wall size was roughly 1 m^2. EFFECT IS STILL THERE !!! I try to manage to create a video during this weekend.

How can I put driller and test object into that?

Theory works also with "massless" particles. Obviously there is mass, but it's just too damn small to detect currently (like photons). I don't have bigger setup available anymore. I think that I save my money to University which runs the test in vacuum, so everybody is happy.

You think that Magnus effect works better with smoother object? Actually with rough high rotating object, effect is poorer. And with large massed ball, effect is great without high rotation frequence. Do you understand? No need for big rotation frequence -> no air induced Magnus effect. Got it? Problem with Moon is the mass. Moon mass is derived with Newtonian gravitation law. And as I have told before, G ain't constant. Moon mass is much bigger in reality than calculated. I think I can manage some University do the test in vacuum here in Finland.

I think it was 50 rps. Well, It's all about Magnus effect! BUT this Magnus effect happens in force transfer ether (FTE). My experiment can be done in vacuum where Magnus effect with air is irrelevant, actually test performs even better in vacuum.

They tried they failed. I did show how to do it The test object was round plastic stick (some kind of knitting thing), so it's smoother than common pencil. Aaa... don't use vaseline! It will be all over the place.

Problem is that some current ideas in physics are a bit wrong. My theory is completely provable, it's not matter of fate, you can validate it. Small airflow But in my experiment with reduced airflow, pulling effect is visible. With even smoother surfaced object result is even better. You can test it by yourself, dare you?

I haven't said that Earth rotates respect to you. The point is that Earth rotates. Rotation generates pulling effect due to Magnus effect in ether.

Well, I don't have a vacuum pump so doing that is out of question at a moment. Air flow is just a problem. With heavier objects you don't need that much rotation frequence to get the effect. You did see the test with a bike's wheel, air flow was too much. With driller (50 rps) effect was ok. With smoother (less air flow) rotating part the effect is greater. Vacuum is naturally the best option. BUT, when generating lifting force with rotating objects air flow is actually helpful. mmm... jumping, but you are on Earth. Earth is rotating and therefore generates pulling force (gravitation).

Yes Sir!

Heh, funny one! But to be axact, cardboard can't shield gravity, it shields only from modifications of ether. It's like you put yourself into large plastic bag, you still experience gravitation, right? btw. don't be too long in that bag Talking about conspiracy, where is Ning Li now???

It's good that this is not only matter of fate. Everyone can test it at home. With better resources you can test it in vacuum. Flights getting cheaper, for sure, at least for space flights. NASA did have a research project in early 2000 with Ning Li and other scientists. They failed, partially because different interests. NASA wanted application and Ning Li wanted to understand how anti-gravitation actually works. Few millions burnt and life goes on.

mmm.. sure you can notice the same effect but not with your bike's wheel (too much air flow induced force). You can even create lifting force with rotating objects but that's another story. Not with the vacuum with bigger rotating object yes. I made illustrating picture into my theory.