rwjefferson
-
Posts
104 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by rwjefferson
-
-
Are stress terms like p and T functions of pressure and tension?newton.001mass in motion means constant vector and velocity unless forcedyour nose grows every time you post.viiitruth is out of context only under the cloak of dogmaCite the Book and Chapter and Verse that proves curvature is more than a reaction to force.hypervalent_ion:In some forums it is considered polite to answer the OP's questions.Are alphanumeric terms like stress and p and T functions of force?Cite the context of your answer if you so fear universal truth.peacerona good teacher learns from all students
0 -
What might stress terms like p and T really mean?stress tensor.001Are stress and pressure and tension states of force?Are stress terms like p and T alphanumeric symbols and grads or fields or curvature?Or might stress terms like p and T also mean functions and derivatives of pressure and tension?welcome to my wormhole.007def: byLawwhereas 'that is the most ridiculous nonsense ever posted' is construed not an ad hominem attack or personal commentarybad dogma.101My goal is to contribute to science and evolution. That the (un?)intended consequence of your game is to thwart and obfuscate and hijack is not necessarily the simple truth you should so readily reveal.Does the relatively rough surface of topspinning balls accelerate air mass around and under and upwards?Does airmass forced around and over and downwards drag and lift underspinning ballmass back and up?If you so fear to admit basic truth, just turn away and hold your peace and let me speak mine own.peaceronthose that fear truth condemn the messenger
0 -
its a curse of course.iIidef: r~bviousnot from what authority tells you sosyn: those that fear truth blame context or messengerIs gravity a state of force or a relatively equivalent mathematical construct? Will maths experts ever admit alphanumeric models and other images sometimes deceive? When will a maths expert calculate the drag of weakly interactive particles gravitating toward mass? Do maths experts know how to put a genie back into the bottle?Is gravity a state of force or an alphanumeric construct?def: dogmawhat authority tells you sor
-2 -
standing against trolls~20.13.08.12,08;141def: piwhat's force got to do width it.viiidef: current wikiyesterday's best understandingDel, or nabla, is an operator used in mathematics, in particular, in vector calculus, as a vector differential operator, usually represented by the nabla symbol. When applied to a function defined on a one-dimensional domain, it denotes its standard derivative as defined in calculus. When applied to a field (a function defined on a multi-dimensional domain), del may denote the gradient (locally steepest slope) of a scalar field (or sometimes of a vector field, as in the Navier–Stokes equations), the divergence of a vector field, or the curl (rotation) of a vector field, depending on the way it is applied.Is total stress (by any other Name) a function of initial inertial differential or bang~entropy or curvature or something even more magical than existence?thanksronas horizon lowers pressure declines over time
0 -
what you see when you look into the eye of inertial pressure differential
ItS
peace
0 -
Are normal and shear stresses more likely a function of inertial pressure differential or curvature or something different? And what does the state of matter have to do with it?reallypeaceron
0 -
welcome to my wormhole.iii
def: topspin
the side rolling into the relative headwind!
newton.001
def: n
a measure of force and mass acceleration
syns: i and m and a and g
bernoulli.007
fluent flowing faster over a horizon means lower pressure and vice versa
Airmass streams downwards behind slippery shiny topspinning bowling balls.
Does lower pressure over accelerate fluent airmass downwards?
newton.102
fluent airmass departing upwards forces spinning ball mass down
Topspinning stitches and dimples drag airmass around and under and upwards.
Do satin surfaced underspinning ping~pong balls demonstrate lift?
inertial pressure differential.001
newton in~verse bernoulli
As inertial and pressure differential are relatively equivalent and streamlines depart straight and level.
How much grit must be glued around a slippery shiny topspinning ball before airmass departs straight and level; no matter spin?
navier stokes.001
[math]\rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} + \mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{v} \right) = - \nabla p + \nabla \mathbf{T} + \mathbf{b}[/math]
navier stokes.101
The stress terms p and [math]\scriptstyle \boldsymbol{\mathsf{T}}[/math] are yet unknown, so the general form of the equations of motion is not usable to solve problems. Besides the equations of motion—Newton's second law—a force model is needed relating the stresses to the fluid motion.
What do the stress terms p and [math]\scriptstyle \boldsymbol{\mathsf{T}}[/math] mean to you? Can you prove it? Really?
ItS
peace
ron
when the legend tells better
tell the legend
0 -
its all so greek to medef: balanceequality between opposing or interacting forcesdef: caveatthese definitions are not necessarily found in flatland dictionariesdef: differentialdifference in all forms et. al. that followssyn: ridiculous nonsense according to those that slept through the evolution of scienceIf you still feel the need to convince me that a galaxy is not dam good model of a vortex stoke your navier posts to the speculations forum and prove it to me and beyond a reasonable doubt the force is not inertial pressure differential.ron
-1 -
insults flourish as reason fails
Did you fall asleep during the "How to have a kind and well reasoned conversation" class? Again?
honestlyIt might be just a quantum bit more dishonest to deny inertial pressure differential is a better model of force than curvature; even if the empress' new cloak lulled you to sleep during the science revolution. wakey wakey up up up/honestlydef: ambivalenceequal in verse opposite valencesyn: N0 deltavortex works for meWhat do you call it when the force of attraction is equal to the force that resists change?ron~oopsI dood it again0 -
yes.iiiThe force IS the differential pressure and what does it take to goad you into admitting vortex is the balance between inertia and differential pressure? Or there IS NO proof the force IS NOT delta pressure.Carry on.as you wishron
0 -
inertial pressure differential.007I did not ask for the direction of the force. Gases and liquids move in response to differential pressure. Pressure 'pushes' from high pressure to lower pressure, and the resultant spiral direction of tornadoes or toilet bowls, is dependant on northern or southern hemisphere location.may be MigL might be on to somethingWhat do you call the force that created heat and wind in the fist place?rondef: bangdon't tell empress I still see through cloak
0 -
does.iinewton.101If a relatively efficient (insignificant friction) inertial (centrifugal) pump spins air mass around and under and upwards; is pump mass forced downwards in verse the air mass accelerated up?How is this different from a baseball?bernoulli.101What if the headwind is relatively thin i.e. inviscid?What if the boundary is relatively shiny i.e. inviscid too?What if you top spin a bowling ball in 0g?What's heat got to do with it?ron
0 -
So what do you call the force that spins a vortex?ron
0 -
look up inviscid.viiDoes the top side of a rolling ball attack the relative headwind faster or slower than the bottom?What does Bernoulli predict under such given conditions?So what about the Magnus effect.peaceron0
-
as you wishI am so sorry; now please cite the first word in phrase that escapes your limited vocabulary.What is the difference between the force and energy and power needed to accelerate and spin fluent matter into a whirlwind and where might flatlanders and you see a tornado twisting and spinning up and away?ronsometime between dreamtime and imagination-3
-
What is the size of a monoxide atom relative to carbon?The recent IBM atomic animation clearly shows the two nuclei of carbon monoxide molecules. Which atom is the larger? Why?ron0
-
goodWhat does D'Alembert call the force that energizes a vortex? What do you?ron0
-
Does a vortex demonstrate centripetal or centrifugal force?honest queries deserve kind and honest repliesDoes a vortex demonstrate centripetal or centrifugal force and why does a twister so twist and spin and tango?memory is the second thing to goDoes a vortex exhibit centripetal or centrifugal force?just ask.ingronsometimes the best answer is yes and yes and no more threats or warnings0
-
geometric models'For a satellite in orbit around a planet, the centripetal force is supplied by gravity. Some sources, including Newton, refer to the entire force as a centripetal force, even for eccentric orbits, for which gravity is not aligned with the direction to the center of curvature.'Theo Koupelis (2010). In Quest of the Universe (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-7637-6858-4Centripetal force is model for attraction - like tension and gravity. Centrifugal force is a model for resistance to attraction - like inertia. Science evolves as good geometric models are replaced by better, by more fluent models.ronode to urban.viiiwarnings from you are points of honor0
-
The centripetal force is the force that keeps a rotating object in orbit.
And here I thought that force was called gravity. Oh... right. According to relativity dogma, gravity is not really a force.
in truth
ron
0 -
I am brought up old school. Can you prove plate tectonics is not still driven by the impact between theia and gaia once upon a long time ago or can you prove it is? I didn't think so.ron~0
-
What happens when the nuclear core of an imactor sinks deep enough to reach critical mass?
ron
0 -
the point.007the more you try not, the more you prove me rightdef: alphanumeric dogmathe dictate that relatively close is close enoughsyn: strawman responsealphanumeric dogma used in a sentence:What we do have are mathematical models that make damn good predictions of what is observed.
Fair warning: if anyone answers these questions and then you "correct" them, you will be cited for a rule 8 violation, and given your history, a suspension is likely.
What if my thread is hijacked by zealots too blinded by dogma to see inertial pressure differential is a better model than curvature?ronmaybe dark matter is not really inviscid; maybe dark matter is only relatively weakly viscid0 -
...and?bad dogmaPlease fore give my language. I wanted to typo too much learning how to misinterpret mathematical models is a dangerous thing and two much alphanumeric dogma do blind weak minds to simple truth and hear you are.Does math prove wings create lift by curvature?Does math prove mass creates gravity by curvature?Do exceptional claims require exceptional proof?current observationStars wheel faster around galaxies accelerated by fluent weakly interacting massive particles. Interacting means matter is subject to inertia and massive means matter is subject to gravity and fluent means matter flows.trolls don't answer the questions; trolls criticize the writingWhat is the relative velocity by viscosity of a wimpy matter headwind that slows a 250kg mass by ~8.74±1.33×10^-10 m/s^2 toward the distant sun?What is the relative velocity by viscosity of a wimpy matter wind that accelerates a 1' x 1' x 1' x 1g mass by 1g toward earth?welcome to my wormhole and gotcha againr~trolls and ACG52 need not reply-1
Is gravity still a state of force?
in Speculations
Posted