Tres Juicy

Where have you copied this from?

It's not written in your style/vocabulary

What matters with those who can claim being members of the true inrelligencia is wheter the are capable that what calculus so declares→ statistics refute it in many cases.

 

You now, I am a very amibale woman and extremely flexible. I am though also one of rather high authority with a position demanding a an ability to command.

It wa sqyite a trnsistion from psychiatrist to hedge fund manager.

But, I so as to happen to love..

 

chalenges.

Look at the grammar and spelling in this last paragraph compared to the main body of the text.

Christian evidence?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxymoron

Would you bring back Bush?

 

Please explain to me just how I Turning Atheist would make my life better?Ushie ♀

You get to live in the real world and get get solid answers backed up with factual evidence

Can somebody give a direct answer to my question? I know there have been a few, but lets get this thread back on track shall we?

I will: There is no god.

If there was and the fairy tale were true then he would, but it's not.

Of course the theists will give excuses as to why an "all powerful" and "infinite" "god" can't or won't prevent evil, but their arguments are always full of holes and completely devoid of evidence.

The fact is; humans are geared towards understanding things through a narrative, and in order to create a narrative about the universe you must first anthropomorphise it, giving it intention and purpose. That's where god comes from.

It's a nice story, but nothing more.

!

Moderator Note

It is not very conducive to a good argument to call something crap without explanation. Even if to you it is self evident. Although I do seem to recall that issues have been brought up with this above. I would propose that the poster who quoted his earlier post review the replies to his original post before further comment.

Sorry, I was pressed for time.

I will pick this apart in more detail later

It is evidence! Think about its history.

The Bible is said to have been found in scrolls near and in Isreal. There is no way that it has come from different scrolls all over the place, yet don't deny each other, if they weren't God-breathed, so they must have been…

The only arguments to that are.

This is crap

1. They didn't find the scrolls, they made it up.

Would you write over 770 000 words just for the fun of making people believe false things?

Power and control. Look at the power it has over you

2. They found the scrolls, but they changed it along the way.

Again, would you write out that many words, in hundreds of copies to trick someone, and for no other reason?

Power and control

More evidence? The people translating, and copying the Bible were punished, and often killed. That's worth a trick?

 

Also, though the Bible's many copies almost all got burned, not all ever got burned. That's not God's protection?

 

Maybe you don't believe their history, but that is no better than believing these atheist scientists.

You say that they have evidence, but have you done their experiments? Why believe them? The Earth could be flat, I don't think it is, but I haven't done experiments to figure that out.

crap

Bloody big atom

Question: I don't believe theuniverse is an illusion (or an accident, if you want to get religious).

This is not a question

My Answer:The Universe that youclaim to be real is nothing but an illusion [The 'Illusionary Universe' and its'Contents' (The 'Diversion').

 

These are beingprojected by The Maya (The 'Illusionary Force' of The Residing Truth), a forceneeded to bring about the illusionary creation for the illusionary play.

 

The above act istaking place in The 'Single Creation', within The 'Absolute Truth' to maintainthe singularity, so as to up hold His 'Omnipresent' status.

 

From an 'IllusionaryForce' (The Maya) you can only expect an illusion.

 

Therefore, The'Universe' that you claim to exist is The 'Illusionary Universe' and its'Contents' (The 'Diversion'), the stage for the play.

 

It is not an accident;The 'Absolute Truth' had a fix plan and a condition before He took up His'Illusionary Creation' in the form of a dream to experience The 'True Freedom'.

 

The above is theanswer to a statement made by Einstein (God cannot have a fix plan when He tookup His creation on an account of The Universe having a boundary lessexpansion).

 

Einstein was wrong.

 

It has nothing to do with religion.

 

'Only a fool praysand an idiot follows, we are not fools, so why do we act like one'.

 

The Truth being'Omnipresent' you can call it: 'As youlike it'.

 

'God, Truth or Shit',it will not make any difference.

 

The word 'Truth' isused here has it is commonly used and accepted.

 

All the charactersact were taken up by a single actor and it will always remain a mystery, as towho this actor is.

This is not an answer

...why do choose to teach your kids what you can't answer, because then it is not true.

I would rather admit that I don't know the answer than make up a fairy tale

 

So the more you keep laughing, the more of the kingdom of heaven I'll get.

 

Is that why your religion is so laughable?

The more people laugh at your ridiculous beliefs, the more you are rewarded?

 

See how it gets foggier as you go farther? That is because of the water in the air (and other particles in the air) make it that way. I see no evidence of this "receding". Again, I am not saying that the earth is flat, I am just saying that you have just as much (if not, less) evidence of the earth being round as evidence of the Bible being true.

What?!

http://www.smarterthanthat.com/astronomy/top-10-ways-to-know-the-earth-is-not-flat/

Show me 1 piece of evidence that the bible is true

"DANGER, COMPLETE CRAP"

I think there are certain people who should have this forceably inserted into their signature

 

The graviton is a mythical particle and has not been proved to exist, just as God has not been proved to exist yet.

And yet tthegraviton is testable and falsifyable and therefore science - god is not.

General relativity is a mathematical theory to try to replace the gravitational effect. I cannot understand how it explains the motion of galaxies.

Perhaps further study is in order?

The bible is trying to explain to all of us how the cosmos works. Is this the same as what science is attempting to do?

No it's clearly not. "god did it" it not an explanation

To me this information is factual. I have made some of the information publically available to others, as I said before.

As I said before, for something to be factual it needs to be factual to everybody - You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts

Where have I been given the chance to show it on this Forum?

You can do so now if you like

So have I, have patience. At this time I believe you do not have the qualifications to test this knowledge.

I don't think you are qualified to make that judgement. Why don't you try us?

Really? Can you say for certainty that Einstein was not inspired by God?

Whatever inspired Einstein, he still worked scientifically and searched for the real truth behind things instead of attributing things to "gods will" or some such cop out

It would not work.

If you think about how the field lines will interact you'll see for yourself

I am not preaching to you, I have not delivered a sermon. I have stated a personal experience.

How can you say I have no "predictive, testable, repeatable scientific evidence, that you have knowledge given to you by God". This is just your stating your opinion as fact.

Feel free to show predictive, testable, repeatable scientific evidence at any time

Okay. You are not the creator, because you have not done anything. You haven't made the universe.

I created the universe and everything in it. This is a fact.

Everything happens because it is my will.

Why? Use your magical powers to make me feel that you're there. You haven't done any of the many things that my creator has done.

I am your creator and as such I have done everything.

I have spoken directly to you, I would say that in doing so I have already offered more proof than any false "god" has.

Can you not feel that I am here? You are interacting with me after all.

Maybe you should try harder

Prove me wrong.

You are wrong - Take it directly from the creator of the universe.

Do not argue with my divine knowledge.

You could not possibly compete with your creator and, indeed it would be blasphemous to do so

Done

Go back and read again what I said before:

 

http://www.sciencefo...od/page__st__60

 

Refresh your memory again.

We're going in circles....

How about you refresh your memory:

http://www.scienceforums.net/index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=boardrules

Either answer the questions you are being asked and back them up with facts or expect this thread to be closed

You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts

Remember, we will require facts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact

Yes, yes they have...

I am not preaching like the church does

But you are preaching, you only have to look back over your posts to see that

I have very specific knowledge given by the Spiritual power of God.

What is it then?

We are supposed to be intelligent human beings, let us act like it.

Agreed, you start

Read my profile.

So which part qualifies you to preach to everyone here that you know better than us?

What is the point you're trying to make?

All I see is someone who thinks they can say whatever they want without backing it up with any evidence other than "god told me"

It's weak at best and I can see this thread being closed very soon because you are not saying anything, there is nothing to discuss, and whenever you are asked to back up something you've said you cite your imaginary friend "god" as the source.

Pointless

If you believe in the Big Bang theory then you must also accept the energy released was the living God.

Rubbish!

I could just as easily say "If you believe in the Big Bang theory then you must also accept the energy released was fairy dust."

I am highly skilled in what I do.

What exactly is it that you do?

Terminal velocity at 36k above the earth will be a huge amount higher than 130mph - there is precious little air up there to slow him down.

 

The air pressure at 36k is about 1/1000 of that at sea level - the temp will be pretty much the same (around freezing point) - so the density will be about 1/1000. Thus the terminal velocity would be around 30 times higher than at sea level (well I guess at sea level you have crashed and made a mess - but you get the idea)

Ok, but can he break the sound barrier before the increasing air pressure slows him down too much?

Obviously he will not remain at 36k above the earth for very long