Jump to content

Tres Juicy

Senior Members
  • Posts

    732
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Tres Juicy

  1. Because the only possibility that physics affords us is a closed timelike curve.

     

    http://blogs.discove...time-travelers/

     

     

    In other words - you cannot travel back in time to before the point in time when time travel became possible.

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

  2. Just a quick line to trash the idea that Moh's hardness scale tells you anything about whether or not you can drill into hard rocks.

     

    In the good old days when record players had diamond needles you had to buy a new stylus from time to time because the diamond wore out by being rubbed against the shellac or PVC that the records were made from.

     

    Also, the "star child" DNA is likely to be degraded so there's no surprise it isn't a perfect match for human DNA.

     

     

    Given a long enough period of time a drop of water will erode any rock

  3. From an article at news.discovery.com:

    "The Maya recorded time in a series of cycles, including 400-year chunks called baktuns. It's these baktuns that have led to rumors of an end-of-the-world catastrophe on Dec. 21, 2012 -- on that date, a cycle of 13 baktuns will be complete. But the idea that this means the end of the world is a misconception, Stuart said. In fact,
    Maya experts have known for a long time that the calendar doesn't end after the 13th baktun. It simply begins a new cycle.
    And the calendar encompasses much larger units than the baktun."

     

    Exactly, it's the equivalent of thinking that the world will end at midnight because my clock will only go to 11:59....

  4. I fail to see why people don't give credit to people for these accomplishments. Everything I have seen so far could have been accomplished with the tools available at the time - It would just be a lot harder and take a lot longer.

     

    As for alien/human interbreeding: Rubbish - you would have more success in breeding with jellyfish, at least they are from the same planet.

  5. The evidence is freely available along with the proof of propaganda. I think in the case of something we don't know or understand,you are missing the point I would simply like to pose the question of its possibility, not obtain numerous debunk information based on your perception pal . Your perception is as unenlightened as anyone else. There were people tested and undefeatedp a 60 year period and unfortunately you must accept that either the hundreds of people employed in the field, their story,and the money spent on it was wrong or your own perception and understanding is wrong . An area of science where very little is told to us and very few theories arise... Left to metaphysics and psionics. I'm not asking you to believe in magic spells pal. Just open your mind to the possibility and discuss it. Don't try debunking it with zero knowledge or experience on it

     

    im not trying to like Rv to psychic powers or david blane.

    so lets dismiss metaphysics and psionics completely??

     

    First of all, you are not my pal, so please take your poorly understood, derogatory use of the phrase between two "actual" mates and do one PAL.

     

    i came here posing a question as a well read man with no more and no less understanding of the science of metaphysics and psionics than anyone else here. its an area of science people like yourself easily dismiss because its not understood. After reading a lot and watching a lot of videos, and reading about psionics uses and understandings I feel its not a subject you can just ignore. In MY perception the pro psionics argument is as poorly tarnished as the anti ......

    My argument is that Stargate, MK Ultra and SRI were not just funded wastes of time. they involved REAL scientists and had SOME real results in an as yet, reasonable untouched area of science. I didnt come with tales of fairies, magic, psycic power or gold bearing leprechauns and as such i dont need a lesson on how to phrase myself in the proper manner to pedantic scientist dismissives. My reference to experiments and files relate to declassifed documents from MOD and CIA and following such highly funded work over (in my opinion) way too long a time to see if something really exists or not http://www.biomindsu...nitiatedRV.html

     

    i simply wanted to hear opinions not a backlash or debunk material based on your perception of science. everything we perceive is just a perception. some people hear things that arent there.i want to shed light on something NONE of us really understand because its not taught.

     

    http://www.youtube.c...be_gdata_player this field is the general line of enquiry

     

     

    This isn't people having a go at you, this is the scientific method at work.

     

    Any claims made must be backed up with evidence - if you want to discuss a subject and you have cited evidence, you need to show it.

     

    That is the only way to have an informed discussion of the subject.

     

    Admittedly, you have posted this in speculations and that allows for more speculative threads but we cannot ignore the scientific method as it is a very powerful tool in overcoming human perception bias and getting to the facts.

     

    http://en.wikipedia....ientific_method

     

    Always cite evidence and references and don't think that because someone doesn't agree with you or asks for more evidence that they are attacking you.

     

    In science nothing is sacred, everything is to be scrutinized and picked apart. It's part of why it works so well.

  6. well the experiments seen real results mate in many government reports throughout the cold war and the cia had so called remote viewing agents up until 91 . while most were undoubtedly fruitless there is too much smoke for there to be no fire. from submarine based experiments to the machine that is shielded yet shows fluctuations around major events ie twin towers and global boom /crash etc. while im still out with the jury on psychic happenings as they appear to be spiritualists or cold readers, i dont believe the senses we all understand are the only ones we posess and the may be something to it. i trawled the net and released governent files and cant rule it out as easily as you seem to be able to. science is to question, not to dismiss pal

     

     

    Throughout the cold war the were huge propaganda campaigns, the US government were responding to soviet propaganda (where the soviets were feeding misinformation about "remote viewing" to the US).

     

    Of course the US (thinking that the soviets had already done it) wanted to show that they also had remote viewing capability, it was part of the propaganda war.

     

    Remember, they also spent a great deal of time and money trying to teach soldiers to kill goats by staring at them...

     

    EDIT: Evidence is the key here, in order to make a compelling argument you will need some.

     

    "Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence"

  7. SO people, despite our scientific understanding, there was still huge investment and some irrefutable evidence surrounding the topic or remote viewing.. do you believe in the possibility of this ability?

     

    i dont class this as a nonsense question and the sheer scale of government funding spent on its investigation (supposedly stopped, although i think not) would suggest it holds some water

     

    Would you care to share this evidence mr Nelson?

     

    I certainly haven't seen anything I would call "irrefutable".

     

    Also there are many examples of governments wasting money on dead ends, the amount of money spent is no indication of the validity of the subject (only that governments are just as susceptable to bias and "wishful thinking" as anyone.

  8. In fat, it is. You are trying to find an explanation which fits with your common, daily perceptions of the world. The universe doesn't work that way.

     

     

    I'm not looking for "an explanation which fits with my common, daily perceptions of the world" - I'm looking for an explanation that fits with physics.

  9. Since it's all there is, the question doesn't have any meaning.

     

    Exactly.

     

    Does this point to holes in our understanding then?

     

    Something cannot exist without a space to exist in - at least not in this universe.

     

    Conversley, does the universe contain itself? If so, how can that be possible?

  10. Yes, but the universe as a whole must reside somewhere.

     

    If the universe is infinite, where does it reside?

     

    My observable universe resides within a wider universe but it all must exist somewhere.

     

    Where or what does the universe exist within?

  11.  

    Every day at work I see building on a massive scale. I see cranes and men with sophisticated machinery and tools struggling to do a descent job (compared to ancient man). I absolutely understand why people with no experience in building could be convinced that men with ropes and logs quarried moved and stacked 100 to 500 ton stones. Not to mention the fact that it was drilled into your head since childhood.

     

     

     

    Just because we don't know how they did it does not mean they couldn't have done it.

     

    They would have invested a great deal of time and energy into learning how to do these things with the tools available at the time (something which we have not done).

  12. I believe what you just did i not thread hijacking. I believe that continuing the discussion here is thread hijacking though.

     

     

    Sorry, do you mean continuing the discussion of the other thread in this thread would be thread hijacking?

     

    Not sure....

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.