superball

Hook line, and sinker. your all a bunch of Hippocrates,

 

My ploy to ethical discussions, I mean to find out how many are capable.

 

Some know how to understand philosophy, most are in delusion of quantum, world deifying particles. Thinking math is the doctrine of modern day world? Please you could never understand, obviously I have determined this in a scientific manner. Using the critical method.

 

All have attacked me. all fail to understand.

 

Mooy poo you also, I have made the conclusion all your education is meaningless. you need to get your money back.

 

suspending me for answering questions? I did not highjack anything.

 

Intelligence is the ability to learn. You don't delete south park videos on a science forum? Grow up.

 

You need everything explained to you? your socialist group , and your antics leads to these determinations.

 

Just if it suites your own twisted needs. You caused the break down in trust, you are to blame.

 

Most of you cannot even grasp reality. I will find a place to talk with intelligent men and women. You will always be the same.

 

I would like to teach you all about your narcissistic tendency's, but I don't have the time to explain. you will figure it out eventually.

 

I wont be posting here any longer. I hope you may learn to look in the mirror for a change. FOOLISH FROGS.

 

Learn how to delete what needs to be deleted, and not the scientific content.

 

Ignorant Peevs.

 

Not one post was deleted from the ethics thread, because you have no idea what it is.

 

Learn more in the link i provided! meanwhile learn how to properly moderate, all of you.

 

Look at the gravity thread as example. Some day you will need to follow along if you want to even be in the race. Its called evolution.

 

This is the place to talk about religion, not argue about it..

 

 

To answer your stupid ignorant questions mooiepoo ill do it again by your own word.

 

P.S, simply put (and ignoring some more complicated etymology), my nickname means 'bullshit' so I do agree that in this discussion it is self evident. Not quite sure how it's relative to relativity, though, unless you're the frame of reference, and I'm the observer.

 

Here is my solution. simply put (you are the one who has been (ignoring some more complicated etymology Get your money back!), my nickname means 'bullshit'. therefore that is all you are, ignoring scientific facts.! You said it your self, Ignoring complicated matters, you have no business policing, and a complete understanding in determining the facts i have provide..

 

 

Quack :P:P:P:P:P

wiki how to tell you simply are

Ok you win. cheers... Mooipoo (self evident), In terms of reletivity. (relitive to observer) I hope this is much clearer.

 

Here is a link i had made clear. This is describing something that is certain.

 

 

Dipole is a poynting, energy. we must act like intelligent human beings. << that much is clear.

wikihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector

 

mooeypoo said keep this scientific

 

 

 

keep this scientific please. the relation is self evident.

 

sincerely super ball. ok i will link you to wiki.

wiki

My link follow cassimir effect. it has been determined that was so

This only describing a dipole, we know what that is? a north and south bar magnet.

the animation is the energy describes as represented.

The poynting energy have been comprised, and also compared. relative.

The scientific principles, are self verified, factors are also included.

 

Don't assume this to be true, but scientific data claims this is so?

 

He said "deifying" scientific factor, Clues, in the realm of particles.

self evident. irrelevant, You need logic defines intelligence.

http://earthquake.us...ear/eqstats.php

 

 

That is not verified stop speculating.

~150 mag 6 or above quakes per year. I'd say the probability of one of them falling in a high earthquake zone in any 10day period is rather high. And if we take the "ring of fire" then around 90% of the earths earthquakes fall there according to wp, so that's 135 on average every year, your prediction is statistically meaningless.

 

Scientist gives, predictable out comes. There is nothing wrong here with that?

Still waiting on predicted out come for a 6.7 earthquake. In a 9 day period. to verify science.

 

It is highly unlikely when you compare data, over time.

Modern day dipole. deifying scientific factor

similarity leads to discovery..

My linkhttp://earthquake.usgs.

 

 

MAP 5.0 2011/11/24 23:18:46 -2.428 140.036 37.5 NEAR THE NORTH COAST OF PAPUA, INDONESIA MAP 5.1 2011/11/24 21:13:19 13.353 -87.898 73.6 EL SALVADOR MAP 6.2 2011/11/24 10:25:35 41.877 142.710 42.3 HOKKAIDO, JAPAN REGION MAP 5.1 2011/11/24 10:23:50 -21.802 -178.981 622.8 FIJI REGION MAP 5.0 2011/11/24 03:55:36 -8.789 109.774 95.3 JAVA, INDONESIA MAP 6.1 2011/11/23 19:24:32 37.373 141.387 33.3 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN MAP 5.0 2011/11/23 12:42:34 -41.260 -84.077 10.0 WEST CHILE RISE MAP 5.3 2011/11/23 12:17:52 34.321 25.056 9.7 CRETE, GREECE MAP 5.4 2011/11/23 01:43:47 -22.829 -68.011 141.2 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE MAP 5.0 2011/11/22 23:09:48 -42.594 -83.410 10.3 WEST CHILE RISE MAP 6.6 2011/11/22 18:48:17 -15.359 -65.125 556.7 BENI, BOLIVIA MAP 5.2 2011/11/22 16:54:05 -2.320 99.382 23.0 KEPULAUAN MENTAWAI REGION, INDONESIA MAP 5.2 2011/11/22 16:45:18 -2.275 99.400 17.1 KEPULAUAN MENTAWAI REGION, INDONESIA MAP 5.4 2011/11/22 07:41:32 -34.866 -71.614 38.3 LIBERTADOR O'HIGGINS, CHILE MAP 5.1 2011/11/21 19:38:29 -37.584 179.113 2.5 OFF EAST COAST OF THE NORTH ISLAND, N.Z. MAP 5.2 2011/11/21 03:48:41 -3.591 150.371 37.2 NEW IRELAND REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA MAP 5.9 2011/11/21 03:15:43 24.947 95.226 121.0 MYANMAR MAP 5.0 2011/11/21 01:39:07 -22.982 -178.388 404.8 SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS

 

6.3 2011/11/14 04:05:12 -0.954 126.864 19.4 MOLUCCA SEA

6.9 2011/11/08 02:59:07  27.291 125.868 209.5 NORTHEAST OF TAIWAN

 

Fact Jan 8 and Nov 2 2010 Huge Montserrat Volcano Eruption on January 8, 2010 . Time frame, recurring in January 2011 volcanic eruption predicted in the Atlantic, mid ,Baja California

 

Al factors, are determined factors.

 

With a binary system, like the binary system we all see. 2011 will mirror once again 2010, 2011, 2012.

Here is your average, of earthquakes, start here.

1<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

!

Moderator Note

superball, you were warned not to advertise other unrelated (CLOSED!) threads in discussions. There will come a time where we will stop reminding you of the rules you agreed to when you joined. Links removed. Next time the post will be deleted.

 

 

mooeypoo

Oh look, Pwnies! == EDITED ==

 

You know, the original poster supplied links to BAUT forum, where the video/idea was already discussed, and the posters there make incredibly good points.

 

(Please remember, to avoid plagiarism and be fair, if you link to anything someone else said, be it in a forum or a website, supply the full link-back and credit)

 

going to show you one more time poo how you are wrong for deleting the 2 links, in your own word.

title of thread can we define simple intelligence.

 

(Please remember, to avoid plagiarism

Ok great I linked were the information was obtained from a search relating to intelligence. Sighted from internet. I used the key board, and said this is the link.

 

ok fine, here is how i did it: Perhaps we may find the definition of Intelligence if we search for intelligence tests.. The test in my link was from the net. I said that clearly.

 

by searching for the tests that have been used to determine

 

((((((One stroke of the key,))))) search >>>>>>genius test >>>>>>> top results brings the {meaning in plain view}.<<<<<<<<<<<< are you blind?

 

 

f you link to anything someone else said

be it in a forum or a website,

supply the full link-back and credit

LINK was supplied, forum link was also supplied.

 

Now for the simple answer of the op question. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>internet link was supplyed. and also a forum link.

 

In each case related to the question ( define simply) not one intelligent person could answer. If you looked at my puzzle the answer was in plain view.... I say, survey says >>>>> IT IS A analyzing system , IT IS A function of learning.

 

your at fault, and you should apologize. I followed the rules in your own word!!!!!

 

Net search>> I used with >>>the link I posted>>>> and linked in relation to>>>> intelligence>>>>> the failure>>>> is on your part.>>>>>>>>. to read, or even understand,>>> and again you jumped the gun. >>>why?

I have made my determination of this forum, a list for you to ponder.

 

I will not be posting amongst the frogs any longer.

 

First the men and women here are out to control human life, population, brain waves, weather, you name it.

 

It takes evil in order to think the way some of the people think around here.

 

Asking stupid questions, like they have no idea.

 

like hiding information that they study for a living.

 

like plotting murder for control over the population, programing all human minds, poisoning the food, the drink, and all life that remains on earth today. Is immoral issues of life, and they have ego so big that they feel it is ok to play god.

 

Virus, radiation releases, biological warfare on the population, weather control, mind altering drugs.

Money laundering, down right scam artists etc.

 

I exposed them for what they are. Snakes in underground bunkers pushing buttons.

 

altering data given to the public, and in some cases ignoring the data completely in some cases.

 

The new world will be a better place, but it just wont be for any of them.

 

start rating my content, and you know what I cant help these people. they are the satanic creatures god speaks about. The reason for this it is by there nature to kill destroy, or just come up with new ways to do that.

 

Blow it out your ears, and move on. Take care people, and have faith.

 

These men, and women will be destroyed for all there inequity that they had caused on this planet.

 

No pudding for them. For the good soul, we shall take up our inheritance of the paradise. The paradise that was called the garden of Eden was this Earth. left in utter ruins because of demonic beings.

 

They slip in among you, and plot disharmony from nature. They can not control all human life, or our thinking. they have no right to do so. We are all warned.

 

I will gladly pass for the new stone promised to me. Take care people.

 

I will stop back, and see what evil is plotting in the future. by reading through threads.

 

Be ready for the attack of human population they planned wile we were asleep.. By nature, there own hateful doings will kill them in the end. leavening nothing but a heart of stone in its place.

 

The vulture will eventually kill each other. It was the inherent nature of the beast, and so it has been described, the devil is among you.

 

The poisoning, and destruction left in there wake. It was never for them, it was for all of us who could comply with our creator..

 

End of transmission, conduit out.

sounds like radiation poisoning, mercury poisoning.

Intelligence Test:

 

 

Perhaps we may find the definition of Intelligence? by searching for the tests that have been used to determine? One stroke of the key, genius test brings the meaning in plain view.

 

 

 

((((((You have to work out what the letters mean)))))<<<<<<<<<< See No 0 as an example.

It doesn't matter if you write the answers in uppercase or lowercase, but the answers

must be exactly as expected (no additional intervals or dashes and the spelling must be correct).

There is no time limit for this test.

 

Answers will (((automatically verified))) as you type 'em.

 

 

You see the top results show meaning. My link, My puzzle survey say >>>>> analyzing system , function of learning. So no you cant engineer a bunch of dead heads in order to serve your own purpose.

 

 

cheers..

HE HE HE

 

I do like everything i have been reading here.

 

With all the energy being released from this thread, I am sometimes surprised. It may not be so obvious.

 

First your seeking in terms of locality to find a given answer. The explanation for planetary orbits is my concern.

 

Grasping concepts like gravitation, can bring new discovery.

 

I understand you want answers, I understand the possibility.

 

You are doing a good job at trying to make determinations, and they also seem like they don't hold up.

 

When dealing with gravitation, my questions for you are as follows.

 

1.what is gravitation?

2. what does gravitation do?

3. why is orbital force used in place of centrifugal?

4. The very non intuitive questions are, how can you compare gravity, and orbital force?

5. Is suggestive: this is an ___________blank..

 

of course I would ask before determination. of course predictions are possible. Most importantly what is obvious..

 

 

Cheers, sinisterly<<< super- ball

The only thing I can think of is muscle wire (I think that's a brand name, can't remember the generic term, sorry). It doesn't so much expand/contract as bend or assume a different shape when heated by electricity.

 

I think there's also some exotic stuff involving nanotubes, but I don't think it is mass market yet.

 

The term is nickle titanium wire,

 

Nitinol Wire...

 

About reflectors: high quality coatings (effectively mirrors) already can reflect nearly 100% of the energy from the sun. The question is what you do with this now:

 

1. Make electricity

2. Make heat (and then possibly electricity, or you use the heat)

 

Don't look at those Archimedes death rays too much. That's all funny for Mythbusters and such, but it is completely pointless to adjust your focus point in a practical application to make energy. That archimedes death ray can hit a moving object with concentrated solar power... but unless your name is Archimedes, why would you want to do that??

 

The place where you want to focus the energy is always the same (just make sure it doesn't move), and sun rays are always parallel to each other...

 

You have simply assumed reflection as the determining factor.

I understand this is what was given, overlooking information is no excuse.

 

I simply state by the information provided. In relation to the experimental research on optics, is by no means what i want to account for.

I have advanced these concepts indefinitely. Right down to the smallest space of refraction.

 

I am speaking of the study's I have preformed. What is reflection, what is refraction. Can reflectors demonstrate increased reflection greater then 100 %, The answer a given no.

 

In seeking in terms of energy. Can concepts of optics be applied. The answer is a definitive yes.

 

The study of refraction. It is a progression of technology, I have taken this into account.

 

what is it that may have been excluded?

 

The smaller the mirror the greater possibility of refraction. I have discovered importance. The energy of a single photon is greater. It is greater than the reflection of photon, based on surface area alone..

 

I simply give this technology to be understood, and advanced. Lets do it forum engineers. You now can understand concept. Provided by the philosophical views of your peers, and all that have came before us.

 

It is the operation of refraction. A given photon train. Each photon energy is equal, now we may understand what has been implied.

 

Optict refraction

 

Sincerely super ball.

Fine. So show us those plots.

 

It is your hypothesis. You have to do the leg work, not us. Otherwise it is just arm waving on your part.

 

You already have assumed I did not.

 

I gave you the scientific principle, Derive average relations, by use of input data over time.

 

The work I have done is not given freely, the process of determined factors is given as your tools.

 

I would be happy to give you information, if you pay for my time. I included a fundamental definition of averages. The input minimum data set required over time.

 

I don't need to give you the data inputs, you can do that all by yourself.

 

I say it is not magic. I say science provides the answer. I say ask the right questions. I say learn how to apply them. You can do this all by yourself if you are interested in the subject.

 

Speculation on your part, factually determined on mine.

 

cheers. Super-ball.

 

Science likes to be correct. The way you apply what is self evident is up to you.

We simply determine time sensitive cycles by observation.

we simply relay the message to future generation.

we simply look for evidence of the star today. That much is clear. A given statement is not self falsified, it remains true.

we simply don't assume, and include more information, we can safely reach conclusions.

I simply say we have a clear object poynting. I simply say creating an increase of net flux, or a force interacting.

simply show how one must determine.

I include reinforcing factor.

we ask if this is possible, and assume it is. It is a verifying factor. It (accounts for the wealth of knowledge in a given frame.)

we reflect on what we see, and then relate it to reality.

we are attempting to verify. time frames give rise, and are verifying factors. apply what is self evident.

The vector energy is relative to the observer. we assume this as a given, and is changing.

 

We find validating scientific evidence. we present it for conclusions. the axiom it is true, therefore we continue along these lines until the likely hood of it occurring in the future is verified. .

when the amount of observable input is sufficient, we learn gravity points by itself. we find the given angle provided by an even more ancient time frame. verify the claim of axiom. all is true until proven otherwise.

the dipole relating to a cassimir effect, and red shift. the star seen today in the east. the flux and energy is inducing a net force in the vacuum of space, in relation with the apparent electric field. if it is poynting it is generating the flux, and energy as described. attribute with observable data, and the conclusions are by certain well known scientific principles.

I have passed the ball on this, the next man must charge for success in its relation, describe the how, and why. If a object can point as a vector in space. this is due to location pinpointing energy. it is a changing relation, gravity is plume waving. It is an automatic generating force. We say it is so, and therefore use data to make the determination of the task at hand,

this simply means gravity type lensing would occur, it also states all by itself that is true.

the object stated is a star. the other a possible companion, is verifying in relation. No other assumption is needed. The object that is poynting.

Energy in a system, Verifiable today. it has also been verified yesterday, and is verifiable in the future.

each picture I posted is in relation to well known scientific principles. representative by the symbols provided. It is relative to an observer, it still continues in the line of scientific study today. The specific year of first observation is therefore estimated. The ball has been passed for you to observe. external net force precession.

Great earthquakes resulting in net force, torque times delta T.

 

cheers.

Use as many factors, and find the function of effects. Scientific method, you may find some variables unrelated.

who ever can express the most functions, and use them in equation wins.

 

analyzing system , function of learning

 

1.determine energy loss.

 

2. function of generating automatic effect.

 

3.watts per square meters function of change part of energy radiating factor

 

4 centripetal force watts per square meter

 

5. Prime mover generating centrifugal force

 

6,. poynting vector

 

7. output centrifugal net force.

 

8. plume waving, is releasing energy, waving the fan from a closed system.

 

9. automatic generating force, Energy of the generating automatic internal force.

 

10. in motion changing.

 

 

Explanations :

 

Intrinsic generating force. stipulating automatic.

 

some variables you can use, your own also:

 

changing gravitation field. relation energy release, fanning effect. energy from the system. energy in square watts. scalar potential. poynting energy.

flux. joules as a measure of gravity.

 

can QM do that? clearly philosophy.

This was posted in the Earth Precession thread. I moved the posts here, since they discuss the Casimir force.

 

That is great, I AM, sorry I had a laps of thought were I had located this input.

 

Happy thanks giving all.

 

Thanks 007, you are a reasonable man..

 

sincerely super-ball.

Earthquakes are internal, so there is no external torque. You redistribute mass and you will change the axis. One must note that the numbers here are from models, not measurements. They assume nothing else has happened but the motion from the earthquake. When I asked about this, my colleagues in Earth Orientation have told me that they had never measured shifts after the major earthquakes. The net effect is too small to measure.

 

Meanwhile, the axis has shifted continually all this time. I have no clue as to why you think this is a "touchy subject"; it's actually vital for the continued operation of satellites, so that they "know" where they are and what direction they are pointing relative to the earth. Errors in that information give rise to errors in e.g. GPS positioning and timing.

 

Greetings all. Happy thanks Giving.

 

I located the mix up. I thank you for the relocation of the data.

 

 

Respectfully, Super-ball.

other science please, not religion.

 

please vote for a compromise, I make my claim.

 

Vote other science.

 

 

I diplomatically ask, and state my claim.

 

Please do not subject your own history to ridicule.

 

This is clearly, archaeology, astronomy. They are our ancestors, please do not ridicule here or i will report. A valid scientific study, and scientists don't claim this as religion.

 

I urge do not post if you have negative input and attack, Do not confuse with religion.

 

respectfully super ball.

 

My link

I will be moving forward from here, I sincerely intend for every reader to grasp concepts.

 

 

My link content

 

Earthquakes

 

Torque induced precession

 

Seismic waves

 

symbols

 

Reflection

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E185G_JBd7U&feature=relmfu

 

Induction, dipoles, leading to volcanic eruption.

 

Sincerely super-ball.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaaP1bWFjDA&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldJhMDuOGxY&feature=relmfu

For your research, I love this guy. A brilliant passionate genius.




Temple on is bigger happy valentine.



heartley 2

Cheers..

For your research, I love this guy. A brilliant passionate genius. Please follow up with lecture lecture 5, 6, 7, 802 lecture 8 covers induction, dipol what have you, feed your head..

follow the yellow brick road

"The scientific method is still valid, and is philosophy. observation describes what you see, the ability of determining out come, and what you are actually seeing (is a fundamental property philosophy). Intuitive, questions that answers, are not intuitive per se.

How was it derived is philosophy."

respectfully super-ball

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldJhMDuOGxY&feature=relmfu

For your research, I love this guy. A brilliant passionate genius.



Cheers..

the pole shifting. the magnetic field represented as a man holding the spherical field magnet. 3 object being pulled, the men holding hands.

 

 

dictating spin direction clockwise around our solar system. solar system is rotating counter clock wise around the sun. poynting vector glyph .

 

 

The asymmetric field magnet

 

 

The poynting vector vector, sincerely super ball

 

 

Meet the modern day dipole, it was my discovery, derived from my inner perception, and philosophy.

 

 

Peace always.. Respectfully super-ball

I am surprised there has been no additional data input.

 

I will include data for review.

 

I had asked the questions : In relation to casimirr, Wiki said "effect When this field is instead studied using quantum electrodynamics, it is seen that the plates do affect the virtual photons which constitute the field, and generate a net force, either an attraction or a repulsion depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates."

 

Swansont said :I don't recall having run across an example of a geometry where there is repulsion

 

Super ball says:

 

This is my confusion, virtual photon constitutes the field. I bring your attention to this interpretation of what constitutes the field, or virtual vacuum, or photon field what have you.

 

My interpretation below, as stated from wiki " virtual photons (which constitute the field,) and (generate a net force,) either an (attraction or a repulsion) depending on the specific arrangement of the two plates."

 

I know The typical example is of two uncharged metallic plates in a vacuum, without any external electromagnetic field.

 

Super-ball states for the record, If I had arranged the plates properly. I say there is also a repellent force.

I have place my plates, or spheres in the electric field, arranged them so they repel, and accelerate them together. The Field is Outer Space. In search of a gravity type response, or increase in flux of the field stated. This is leading to inductions across the entire solar system, and verified Einsteins 3 principles of relativity at the same time.

I give you not only The reason 2 charged spheres may have the same given charge. I also accelerate them together creating a gravitational lensing effect, or according to GR a red shift.

Why did Einstein assume only mercury? Jupiter, Venus, mercury, and Earth also experience perturbations. We can now verify the condition, stating all planets have been perturbed.

 

With that said, how do we acquire the charge on the spheres, and cause the virtual photon field to generate a net force? By acquiring the same replant charges in the first place, and accelerating them together.

 

I do realize this effect is verifying, it has occurred, and continues to do so.

 

The first task is by arranging two like charges of a material that would not have any attracting force in the ISCM, or outer-space. You might say, How can that be all body's attract, but is that an assumption?

 

It certainly is. Name two bodies that would have the same type charges as described. I will give you a clue. After you say your prayers tonight of course.

 

your concern may lead to a better understanding of the process of torque induced precession.

 

It has been found to be a progression of axial shift. Over a 3 to 5 year period starting in early months of 2010.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLy0IQT8ssk

 

Wiki "

 

Poynting vector

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dipole Radiation, Dipole parallel to the z-axis, electric field and poynting-vector in the x-z-plane. In physics, the Poynting vector can be thought of as representing the directional energy flux density (the rate of energy transfer per unit area, in W/m²) of an electromagnetic field. It is named after its inventor John Henry Poynting. Oliver Heaviside and Nikolay Umov independently co-invented the Poynting vector. In Poynting's original paper and in many textbooks it is defined as

 

which is often called the Abraham form; here E is the electric field and H the auxiliary magnetic field.^[1][2] (All bold letters represent vectors.) Sometimes, an alternative definition in terms of electric field E and the magnetic field B is used, which is explained below. It is even possible to combine the displacement field D with the magnetic field B to get the Minkowski form of the Poynting vector, or use D and H to construct another.^[3] The choice has been controversial: Pfeifer et al.^[4] summarize the century-long dispute between proponents of the Abraham and Minkowski forms."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You might say, all may be verified mathematically, and the need for clarification is irrelevant. The two repulsive forces are derived by said objects being made of the same generating material. El e ho.

 

respectfully super-ball..

I do not think that Quantum Mechanics, because it can be explained in less mathematical terms, is altered/lessened in any way. QM is a highly predictive and accurate theory; as per my above comment, science no longer calls for some metaphorical reinforcement from an underlying truth. A description of what happens, with a mathematical basis that allows for both empirical testing and future predictions is a theory.

 

Reinforcing you claim in lay-men

 

philosophy view This is disheartening. You say science no longer calls for some metaphorical reinforcement from an underlying truth. Tell that to the guy trying to reproduce in a laboratory experimental evidence.

 

How in the world of pots, and pans does is given explanation sufficient? without grasping the concept? How might I understand by observation this is so? It has been said mathematics may be reduced to a simple understanding. Binary code, binary words. How could you grasp meaning living in the realm of scrutiny without knowledge of what is actually occurring?

 

QM is a highly evolved mathematical discipline. QM is needed for the task.

The statement (I do not think) is exactly what I am trying to determine.. In reality, and not fantasy we must think. In order for the next man to grasp a given concept. It must be relative to the observer. You may say QM gives solutions to a given problem. I tend to agree, but QM is giving answers, not short cuts? For vastly difficult problems, and models that require QM for the solution. It is not philosophy, nor is it a theory. It is the data set required, as it stands. QM is needed...

 

 

A data set is clearly not a theory, and neither is a blank prediction; a physical theory tends to say, we have observed X situation gives rise to Y results, we have derived a mathematical model in which X gives rise to Y, the theory would predict that in a situation W we will see the results Z, we can test this by looking at this real world scenario in which W will occur and thus should give rise to Z .... there is no need to attempt to drill down to an unarguable truth - we have more or less decided that this is unobtainable.

 

I 100% agree with this statement in relation to QM finding specific particles, and relating these particles to the world of pots, and pans is irrelevant. (unobtainable)

 

I hope my statements are not is some way unrelated, or in poor taste.

 

Respectably super-ball.