morgsboi

What do you mean?

So, what do the symbols mean so I can actually understand the whole equation. I know what the particles are. Anyway, I'm just doing something new really.

Because energy and mass are equivalent. In fact, I think photons distort the fabric of space even easier than matter. Both matter and energy responds to distortion in the fabric of space.

Yeah, I actually don't remember making that post. :S if it were possible to see, I wonder what light would look like in a singularity.

So what makes you think photons distort the fabric of space easier than matter?

Thanks to you both, can anyone explain it?

Hi, I had been looking all over the internet for this equation that describes everything except gravity. I finally found it but it is on a shirt! :S

Anyway, please could I know:

The name of the equation

What it means

And it put in layman terms

Any other information you have on it would be great.

I'm new to it and it interests me so i would really like to know more about it. Thank you.

Edit: Forgot the bloody link! Stupid me. XD

http://www.zazzle.co...614641326468730

Edit 2: I think it is called the Higgs Field. But I'm not sure.

Yes, but the negative energy is still there. For somethings they don't cancel out each other.

Yes, but there is an equal amount of positive energy.

BTW, downvoting posts that one does not understand is generally not a nice thing to do.

It was totally irrelevant to what I was asking. Anyway, I see you up voted it so it doesn't matter.

What about homeopathic porn?

And what exactly are you on about?

In the WordPress admin section, there is a Plugins page. Enable the Firestats plugin. You can then see live statistics (visitors, pageviews, etc.) in the WordPress admin, through the Firestats tab.

 

I don't mind if you include advertisements, so long as they are content-appropriate (e.g. no ads for porn sites).

Okay, thank you for your help.

Hi, I was wondering how I can add a hit counter to my blog.

Also, to SFN staff, is it okay to have advertisements on the blog?

The insititue of physics have local branch meeting, there is a London & South East Branch and a South Central Branch. Sometimes their lectures are suitiable for a general audience, but not always.

 

http://www.iop.org/a...east/index.html

Thank you. I will bear that in mind but London is a bit too far away for me. I live in Poole, Dorset.

We know that mass slows down time as mass warps the space-time around it.

Hello, I was wondering if anyone knows or has any links to upcoming lectures in the field of physics around the south of England. I am very interested in advanced science although I am only 14. Also, if anyone knows anything about upcoming public appearances from Professor Stephen Hawking then please let me know! He is my idol and it would be so amazing if I could meet him. That bit applies to anywhere around the country.

Thank you.

Now I know what you are talking about.

Still, you never take away by making something that didn't take anything to make.

Physics are "positive energy"(kind of). The thing is that even if matter made itself from physics, the physics are still positive energy, they're not physically here, but I would still call them "positive energy" because they had to come from somewhere

1[physics]+1[matter]+0[what got used for matter to come]=2

Where is that 2?

 

Edit: If you're then going to talk about the positive and negative energy in an atom, I don't see why that negative energy counts as a negative. It is physically here, and it doesn't cancel out the positive energy.

I'm talking about the sub-atomic particles and how when the negative and positive meet, they will cancel each other out.

that's root of negative 1! How do you conclude about the value 'i'?

Because it is a value that doesn't exist.

 

doesn't that possibly violate the the simple basic laws of mathematics? if x/y = z then yz =x? I mean again if we calculate the tangent of an angle 90? A ratio of infinity? At that ratio the triangle wouldn't even exist!

But you wouldn't calculate the triangle using 0. It is a bit of a weird one. I think it must be [math]i[/math]

Simply, a number divided by zero is 0. This would be because x/2 = y and y*2 = x. So if x has y fractions, then any number put into zero fractions would cancel out the number. Bit hard to understand I think but I think it works.

Edit: I've just realised my error because that would mean that x*0 = y which is wrong. It must be either "i" (imaginary number) or infinity.

Edit 2: This shows how it must be infinity.

10 divided by 2 is 5.

10 divided by 1 is 10.

10 divided by 1/2 is 20.

10 divided by 1/5 is 50.

10 divided by 1/10 is 100.

10 divided by 1/100 is 1000.

10 divided by 1/1000 is 10000.

So the smaller the number it is divided by, the larger the number. If you divide by 0 then the answer is infinity.

You've just proven Adam and Eve and this is the thing that bothers you?

No, as I said in the post 'Came across this on Facebook'. I was only wondering what peoples views of it were.

Maybe they had them.

But how would they have them if it is where they are cut from the umbilical cord?

They are not actual pictures of Adam and Eve.

I know that but why would they be drawn with them?

Came across this on Facebook. Any thoughts?

I completed the survey. Honestly, it had no point or meaning.

And yes..... why??

I said to my wife "That's amazing, I've never seen you put the phone down after only ten minutes",

"How come?"

She said, "It was a wrong number".

You can always tell when a terrorist is shopping for clothes when they say:

Does my Bomb look big in this?"

Forgive me if I don't accept your musing about a drawing on a piece of paper as evidence about the fundamental nature of the universe. Just because something seems to make sense within the realm of our everyday experience does not necessarily mean it can be applied to the whole universe. Terms like "it must have" and "everything" should be used carefully.

Agreed, thanks for correcting me.

That's another dimension.

You have to move perpendicular to your two directions on the surface of the ball to get there.

Analogous in 3d Euclidean would be moving in a direction that is not up, down, left, right, forward, back or any combination.

There is no outside to the closed 2d space on the ball. It's embedded in a higher dimension, but that is a distinct concept.

But even with that, the dimension still exists.

Now look at the surface of the ball.

Consider it a 2d space.

Where is outside?

From the point you are looking at.

What evidence do you have that this is true?

The fact that 2 dimensions have height and width.

3 dimensions have height, width and depth.

Draw a square on a piece of paper. The square will be 2 dimensional (almost) and the paper will be 3 dimensional. If you look at the square, what is the white inside it. It goes out past the square.

Hold a ball and look at it. If that represented the universe and you were inside the ball, you would look at the inner skin of the ball and wonder what's out there even if it is just space.

For space to be finite, it must have some type of wall or boundary somewhere, but then, what is on the other side.

For those who love Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory:

http://tvcomedies.about.com/od/funstuff/a/sheldoncooperquotes.htm