KaiduOrkhon

Hi gene Is poetically rhyming humor ok? Hope this works: (Variations on this thought provoking vignette appear else-where on the net. Copyright 1979 - 2009, by K. B. Robertson. All rights reserved. With proper accreditation for authorship, may be reproduced and distributed for recreational or educational purposes. Condensed book <not for sale> freely accessible at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie) For more cost free rhythm and reason, please consider a recreational season that resonantly sings beyond theories of strings. From Euclid's straight line shine to Isaac's golden apple, and Albert's inspired geodesic grapple. A catchy little tune that most anyone can croon, by the curved silvery light of Albert's expeditionary moon. Dr. Einstein's waking inspiration may yet sweep the sleeping nation at the break of dawn and the slightest provocation. An unrecognized solution that could start a peaceful revolution. Big Bang Gangology’s further confirmation of their favorite libation - more denial and debate with the orphaned Steady State. Behold Albert's resurrected smart bomb with enduring aplomb. Benevolent bomb leaves all the buildings and people intact; takes 4-D space-time to get'em back on track . Asked the teacher what gravity was, an' all he said is what gravity does. Said I wanna know why, not how things fall. Teacher said nobody knows that one at all. Asked the people on the 6 O'Clock news; they said on that we have no views. Same thing happened in a physics lesson - a picture of Newton gave a puzzled expression. Still wanted to know what gravity is, so I went outside and continued the quiz. Asked a mathematician and he took all day saying gravity is numbers. So I lit one up and, went into suspension, tintanambulating beyond the 3rd dimension. The answer appeared as a gentle kiss, so I wrote another poem and it goes like this... A Brief History of Rhyme - A Celebration of Space-Time Almalgamation Liberated From extended Fragmentation (The dreaded thread) Poetic science appliance. Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field reinstated w'out mathematics. The joining of Field with Quantum Mechanics. The exclusion of politics from science. A scientific paradigm shift alliance. Scientific 'mainstream' panics at quantum mechanics Democritus foresaw the invisible atom, but since then his discovery is found with substratrum. From antiquity, and ubiquity the continuous wave was the rave. Faraday found the cathode ray. Thompson uncovered electrons one day. Rutherford saw protons in a different way. Understood Maxwell's waves beneath the celestial hood, discovered electromagnetic fields as no one thought he would. The wave emitting electron could not be subdivided - at first it was whispered, then openly confided. Yet along came smaller mysterious articles, of Max Planck’s curiously indivisible 'particles' : Transforming a known world of electrostatics into a truculent tangle of quantum mechanics. Conceptual doors were opened for the entrance of protons, but no comprehensive vacancy for the residential photons. Other atomic tenants varied in weight, height and disguise, but the photon is always the same null value and size. A deteriorating atom might change its balance or valence, while the unchanging photon showed no such talents. Vigils are kept to find it changing its station, while its stubborn identity confirms in black body radiation. At dollar conventions where no change is invited, twenty nickels sit down to an audience excited. The quantum takes for granted inclusion, while greenbacks resent the currency intrusion. To and from spherical shells the electron darts - while the unchanged quantum arrives before it departs. If you’re looking for a message in here, it’s of Max Planck’s quanta and Niels Bohr’s spheres. Invincible in principle, Newton’s Mechanics are sure as shooting, while quantum mechanics are robbing and lootin'. Evolutionary experiments are eclectic, but the final conclusions are photo-electric. As though these convulusions are not enough, reality panned out some other stuff. The only certain universal permanancy, is Einstein’s constant light-speed and Heisenberg’s indeterminacy. Einstein’s fort was special & general relativity, while his Nobel Prize was for photo-electricity. Uncle Albert having firstly proven to be right - ahead of Brownian motion and the speed of light. This century old issue of size is how Einstein won the Nobel Prize - how the peace loving master-blaster stayed alive, in the timely year of 1905. Anaxgoras of pre biblical days took big and little to greater heights and stays, he said "There’s always something larger than large, and always something smaller than small." Perhaps the smallest-large statement of all. May this admonition of illusion be this brief sonnet’s conclusion. The 20th century path has been rough - to the point of surrendering enough of this stuff. - K. B. Robertson, Copyright 1979 & 2009 All rights reserved. This poetry or its links may be used for non commercial educational and recreational purposes, providing that proper accreditation is extended to the author. Though this ballad may be spiritual or mental, any semblance to education is purely coincidental. Readers are invited to this paragon of camp, may the poetic winner be rewarded with writer's cramp? Whoever may think that here is no thought, please feel free to continue and give yer best shot. For those who would approach science by an alternative path, you may consider Einstein's Relativity without any math: http://www.toequest.com/forum/toetheory-articles/2516-total-field-theory-reinstatement-cosmological-constant-steady-state-theories.html

Date: 2007-04-12 T20:47:08 NEW CLUES ABOUT THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER: Einstein May Have Been Right After All: The good news from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope is that Einstein was right — maybe. A strange form of energy called "dark energy" is looking a little more like the repulsive force that Einstein theorized in an attempt to balance the universe against its own gravity. Even if Einstein turns out to be wrong, the universe's dark energy probably won't destroy the universe any sooner than about 30 billion years from now, say Hubble researchers. "Right now we're about twice as confident than before that Einstein's cosmological constant is real, or at least dark energy does not appear to be changing fast enough (if at all) to cause an end to the universe anytime soon," says Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore. Riess used Hubble to find nature's own "weapons of mass destruction" — very distant supernovae that exploded when the universe was less than half its current age. The apparent brightness of a certain type of supernova gives cosmologists a way to measure the expansion rate of the universe at different times in the past. Riess and his team joined efforts with the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) program, the largest deep galaxy survey attempted by Hubble to date, to turn the Space Telescope into a supernova search engine on an unprecedented scale. In the process, they discovered 42 new supernovae in the GOODS area, including 6 of the 7 most distant known. Cosmologists understand almost nothing about dark energy even though it appears to comprise about 70 percent of the universe. They are desperately seeking to uncover its two most fundamental properties: its strength and its permanence. In a paper to be published in the Astrophysical Journal, Riess and his collaborators have made the first meaningful measurement of the second property, its permanence. Currently, there are two leading interpretations for the dark energy as well as many more exotic possibilities. It could be an energy percolating from empty space as Einstein's theorized "cosmological constant," an interpretation which predicts that dark energy is unchanging and of a prescribed strength. An alternative possibility is that dark energy is associated with a changing energy field dubbed "quintessence." This field would be causing the current acceleration — a milder version of the inflationary episode from which the early universe emerged. When astronomers first realized the universe was accelerating, the conventional wisdom was that it would expand forever. However, until we better understand the nature of dark energy—its properties—other scenarios for the fate of the universe are possible. If the repulsion from dark energy is or becomes stronger than Einstein's prediction, the universe may be torn apart by a future "Big Rip," during which the universe expands so violently that first the galaxies, then the stars, then planets, and finally atoms come unglued in a catastrophic end of time. Currently this idea is very speculative, but being pursued by theorists. At the other extreme, a variable dark energy might fade away and then flip in force such that it pulls the universe together rather then pushing it apart. This would lead to a "big crunch" where the universe ultimately implodes. "This looks like the least likely scenario at present," says Riess. Understanding dark energy and determining the universe's ultimate fate will require further observations. Hubble and future space telescopes capable of looking more than halfway across the universe will be needed to achieve the necessary precision. The determination of the properties of dark energy has become the key goal of astronomy and physics today. CONTACT Don Savage NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC (Phone: 202-358-1547; E-mail: dsavage@hq.nasa.gov) Ray Villard Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD (Phone: 410-338-4514; E-mail: villard@stsci.edu) Adam Riess Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD (Phone: 410-338-4509; E-mail: ariess@stsci.edu)

From: RascalPuff (Kaiduorkhon) 12:51 am To: ALL (1 of 1) 3.1 Professor Paul Dirac's proposed anti-particle (electric charge, referred to as a 'particle') and its proposed explosion upon contact with a conventional 'particle' (electric charge) may be an ongoing event constituting the status quo of reality as we experience it... Consider a sphere such as a macrocosmic planet, the sun, or a microcosmic system such as an electron 'particle' (electromagnetic charge). Each generates an electromagnetic field, wherein the magnetic portion of that field emanates in a northerly direction from the north pole of the issued sphere, loops around it in a circular motion which suddenly is traveling in a southerly direction upon reaching and passing the ecliptic middle of the issued sphere. Whereupon the continuing loop completes a full circle around the planet, sun or electron that generates, maintains and sustains it, said magnetic field then entering the southern pole of it's given system of origin to resume a northerly direction through the axial center of and relative to the polar system at issue. This described dynamic represents an ongoing cyle of magnetism generated by and emanating from, around, and back into the system that generates, maintains and sustains it. The sphere itself, en toto, is stablized by a magnetic field which is constantly moving in opposite directions - northerly out of, then looping around to a southerly course, and back into and through the issued spherical entity, ad infinitum. The reverse of directions - from north to south - occurs at the ecliptic (equatorial bisection) of the issued, spherical electron, planet or star Each given system is also emitting electrical energy at right angles from the system that the magnetic field is parallel to. These directional reversals and discharges may correspond to the occurrence of quantum emissions. In the four dimensional setting that Einstein has assigned to all material systems, these two hemispheres are oppositely interacting with each other ('as anti-particles'), resulting in the Dirac-predicted explosion, constituting nothing less than the omnidirectional expansion of 4-D systems; not excluding the consideration that mass increases with velocity. (This is an unprecedented explanation of the combined work of Planck, Dirac and Einstein. More will be said about this later. Copyright by K.B.Robertson 2/2007 and 12/'79). Further info accessible at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

Dear Elas: You just summed up the status quo in transitional physics today: "There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of the current state of our knowledge of physics." Dark matter. Gravitons. String Theory. The list of tachyons, leprechans and put ons goes on and on... Most of the so called 'new age physics' is frantically straight faced, straw grasping hypotheses... Including the so called 'big bang theory' - which is an hypothesis, and a very poor one at that (there is no common center from which the observed expanding universe, expands. This is not the signature of an explosion. It is the signature of a repellng force in accordance with Newton's laws of 'attractive force', but acting in the opposite direction). We often hear of Einstein's abandonment of his Cosmological Constant; we do not hear that he was back to working on it until his passing in 1955 at Princeton. There's more to this of course. A lot of it is TOTAL FIELD THEORY at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie Thank you and yours for being, and for reading this missive.

I have a generalised new perspective on - re-cognition of a series of relatively old - tried and true theories; where the mathematics and predictions are already well established. That is, the required predictions and mathematical confirmations are already in place as the status quo in contemporary theoretical and astrophysical science. http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

Dear zeropointquarklinda: the first url is a crtique on Einstein by a guy named Hutchison, who, uhm, speaks for himself.Compliments of 'bascule', of Science Forums and Debate - SFN, http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128 The following URL clicks on to TOTAL FIELD THEORY, by Yours Truly http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie A pop-up ad may occur on the first click of the above URL, after X'ing that out, a second click takes you there.

Dear zeropointquarklinda: the first url is a crtique on Einstein by a guy named Hutchison, who, uhm, speaks for himself.Compliments of 'bascule', of Science Forums and Debate - SFN, http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128 The following URL clicks on to TOTAL FIELD THEORY, by Yours Truly http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

After recently receiving several introductory notices via email from SFN, I gratefully introduce myself as That Rascal Puff. I'm a science writer and author of a number of small press published works on Einstein's relativity and ethnology. Tormod, Turtle, GAHD and others are my former correspondents. The 'Posting Rules' say that I may post new threads, replies, attachments, or edit my posts. I'm not sure whether to do this or not. Uhm. Dear Hearts: Is this a reinstatement, or an error of some kind?

Dear ZeroPoint Quark Linda: Thank you for your request. Unfortunately I do not have permission of the incumbent administrators to refer Readers here (via 'click-on URL' or other URL address) to one chapter - or for that matter the entirety of my condensed version of my 627 page, 45 year, 10 sold out edition, small press, internationally distributed work. I have already been chastized for posting extensive messages, hence I am unable to fulfill your complimentary request. Mr. Bill Hutchinson - EINSTEIN WAS WRONG!! AND EVIL!!! is permitted to be clicked on, but not my work gainsaying his and that of the Final Theory, written by an Australian who begins to parallel my work (feigning ignorance of it) and then perilously breaks away from it into a communications pudding that fails to set up whether its chilled or heated. I do not understand the inequity of allowing Bill Hutchinson's black magic and anti semitism to be clicked on here, while - so far - any such suggestion or action on my part, regarding my work, has been disallowed (there seems to be some sort of an idea that I'm trying to sell what I've sold out ten times and have always freely given away also. It used to be entitled THE NEW GRAVITY, then it went on to being GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION: Extraterrestrial Physics 101, then GRAVITY, ELECTRICITY & MAGNETISM are the 4TH, 5TH & 6th DIMENSIONS: THE NON-MATHEMATICAL REINSTATEMENT OF EINSTEIN'S PRESENTLY ABANDONED UNIFIED FIELD: THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG: ENTROPIC HEAT DEATH IS A MYTH. Presently I call it TOTAL FIELD THEORY. It's posted and can be freely accessed, but the predominant management forbids it. Yes. I have a 'new' theory, based on previous non recognitions of the foundations of classic and contemporary physics. But I'm not allowed to connect readers of 'Do You Have A New Theory' to it. :eek Thank you for asking.

Hoping this information corroborates the edifications of J'Dona, Severian and anyone else who couldn't agree with them more, including Truly Yours. An introduction to an introduction: THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS. by Professor Frank Pajares, as remarkably condensed by Thomas S. Kuhn. An advised required reading to anyone interested in and/or involved in any of the sciences, particularly pragmatic and theoretical physics. With kudos to Mr. David DubinaSix, of Alaska (nor is this the first riveting package of information that Mr. Six has forwarded to this record ) This same URL clicker occurs near the close of this dissertation on TOTAL FIELD THEORY. If you don't enjoy snowboarding, skiiing, ice or rollerskating, golf or baseball, horseback riding, hockey - or reality in general - you can probly skip this intro to the introduction (It Requires High School Reading Skills - far more challenging than TV GUIDE, for example...) Otherwise, please relax. Clear your mind, and, arm yerself with a large container of popcorn and/or chips and a non-alcoholic beverage (You may slide 'n glide, sea 'n ski, earth, wind and fire when ready, Skidly?). http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/kuhnsyn.html This URL sometimes lands on fine print which may be enlarged via clicking on the 'View' mode in the upper left hand corner of your moniter. Adjust 'Text size'. (So easy, even a Geico advertising administrative executive can do it?) The record was inspired to proffer the above (may I say 'riveting') URL, in the spirit of the immediate above quoted message posted by MARTIAN, and the perhaps majority who may agree (Sorta like the chicken soup, that can't hurt any, and, may help?). Thank you for being here, and there. I am gratefully and respectfully, That Rascal Puff, Aka K. B. Robertson. (Of course my TOTAL FIELD THEORY <is not an hypothesis> is not presented here, neither is its URL, though it is, in my humble estimation, completely ingenous and germane as an issue in this thread. With permission of the adminstrators <including J'Dona and Severian?>, it would be an honor and a privilege to bring one chapter of my book to this thread, and, should it not meet the administrations requirements, it follows that it won't be posted for very long if at all. I request this opportunity, that those who will, may draw their own conclusions. Thank you - one and all, large and small - once again. - That Rascal Poof )

SaSke private messaged yer 37 and bird like fly but not fly like bird.

Lepton Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand Posts: 0 hey that guy in ur avata is frm "death note" isnt it?? ________________________________________ Ya. it mkes 2 " " n'ow. NewZeaxCanadaconeXXion. 11 months of AA koded konTempt. Ave#2atesitePaswrd. Trans'helback-equatory. Demands rite 2.2 AA dbl 'death note' jury trials. Eel ave is way- X-ray. We'l see'l. (Nadie poder cojer el cajones. Immuno a le 'n carcero.) appy returns on new # 1-667 stalking grounds. Jck zes velcom b'AckAk.

From: That Rascal Puff (Kaiduorkhon) 1:04 am To: ALL Of Justice: "Do not wait for the last judgement. It takes place every day." - Albert Camus "May your nearly prepared breakfast toast always land butterside up." - That Rascal Puff Fully aware that any staffer may crisply gaffe this post from its placement here in the Intro department of SFN, humble scribe may only hope this protean public message may serve the casual interest, if not the recreation, studied probity - or education - of whomever may honor it with the equity of a simple browse, perusal or scan. For more seasoned forumites and arbiters, it may be recognised and amenably qualifed not only as a tenably continuing introduction, but also a progressive rounding off and closure of a marathon if figurative, microcosmic socio-political collapsation, and moral disentanglement. 27.1 (*NOTE: It is a crime punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both, to falsely replicate or alter any legal records such as those presented in the following documentary. <This post was installed 22 February 2006 Wednesday. Narrative subject to revision or amplification.>) GREETINGS: Due to long standing, increasingly pejorative, here and gone; zig-zag; now you see it, now you don't - blight on the world wide web and the internet, the following documentary message is proffered as a Public Service. Allowing the Reader to draw - activate or recreate - her or his own conclusions. Although many persons and circumstances are responsible for inspiring - if not requiring - the posting of the below delivered documentary messages (There's much more where they came from; originating in as many stations of authority), one Brian Kirk Parquette ('Bkparque', and the <'square baby' changing> company that keeps him <'Ver7ein'>), since December 1999, is (sometimes anonymously; or impersonating someone else) at the center source of - and the inspiration for - the http://www.net peppered revilements (diatribe, put-downs, gotcha's, false rumor mongering, muck making, name calling, hook, sinker 'n line stealing, merit parroting, impotently preponderant, self rescindent, orifice retentive, bell book & candle plagiarizing, stuck-fixated beezlebub finger pointing, prevarication stationed, sadomasochistic-narcissisistic, call to sessions on 'reverse confession' obsession < r squared multi-dimentia [absolute ground zero free fire zoning, dragon's tail tickling, flash pointing, massively critical], fissile pi [carrying itself out to it's last high resolution hacked out fractal decimal p'oink] > ) AT ISSUE, HERE: TO WHOMEVER IT MAY CONCERN (Be they foreign, or domestic...) *Asterisked <* > parenthetical inclusions in the following statements are refinations of the author, K. B. Robertson <Record keeper>.) ________________________________________________ To: From: Columbia Heights District Police Kent B. Robertson Chief Stuart Anderson 114 Maple St. #2 559 Mill Street NorthEast Santa Cruz, CA. Columbia Heights, Minnesota 95060 55421 20 February 1991 Wednesday Dear Chief Anderson: This letter represents an urgent inquiry in search of possible records confirmation that may exist in your department’s files, contingent to an ongoing federal suit concerning a nearly thirty year old, extant series of ongoing, conspiratorial pedophile felonies; originating in the early ‘60s and continuing to the date of this writing. Mr. Bruce Robertson, a defendant in ongoing litigation, alleges that he wrote a letter of complaint to your department Police Chief, in late 1964, regarding the allegory rape of his four year old daughter, by one juvenile, Michael Jensen, of Columbia Heights (Mpls) Minnesota. This letter of complaint was in fact seen by several (currently) affirming witnesses in 1964, but there is no confirmation that it was ever sent-to or received-by, your department. Mr. Bruce Robertson’s return address at the time he says he wrote this letter of complaint to your then-incumbent Police Chief, was 1624 Iris Street, Denver/Lakewood, Colorado. The letter alleged that the subjected rape had occurred some six months earlier, under your jurisdiction in the Columbia Heights District; at the residence of Michael Jensen’s mother. Does your department have any record of any such letter of complaint from Bruce Robertson, about his (teen aged) brother-in-law, Michael Jensen? Having learned of this rape six months after the fact, of course Bruce Robertson, the father of the alleged raped child, was legally obliged to report the crime, which he insists that he did. Bruce Robertson alleges that he sent the cited letter to your department in late (Nov. - Dec.) 1964, and which letter Bruce Robertson also insists, resulted in legal juvenile court actions against Michael Jensen of the Columbia Heights District, who, at that time, was 15 years of age. There are updated and complex contingencies of this stated event which *nullify standard limitations statutes, insofar as an ongoing conspiracy seems to be directly related to this otherwise nearly thirty year old event (*refer FEDERAL CODE, TITLE 18, CONSPIRACY). Although the non-recovery of any such record would not resolve a great deal, its recovery confirmation would certainly clear Bruce Robertson’s name (*as well as myself and anyone else besides Michael Jensen, if in fact these allegations are true) and clarify his allegations, if this cited letter (*and incident) could simply be confirmed to have in fact been received by your office in the ascribed time-frame; all the better if a manifest copy of such letter could be tendered. Any response from your office regarding this urgent inquiry will be of great import in the subjected, pending 17th (*Federal) District litigations (*at that time, Congressman Leon E. Panetta, later succeeded by present 17th District Congressman, Sam Farr). Awaiting your much needed reply, I am very respectfully yours, (*Long hand and typewritten signature.). Kent Benjamin Robertson (Brother of the defendant). 114 Maple Street, Santa Cruz, CA. 95060 ph: 408-459-6709 ______________________________________ (*Asterisked parenthetical inclusions in the following statements are refinations of the author.) (*The original copies of the following documents from police officials in Anoka, Minnesota are on file and/or witnessed by 17th Federal District Congressman’s Aides, Rachel Dann and Craig O’Donnel (1-831-429-1976), as well as the staff (*Attn. Ms. Meridith) of the Record’s Department, Santa Cruz Police Department, Santa Cruz, California: including a number of distinguished citizens - Yvonne SueEllen Young, retired legal secretary, ph: 1-559-449-0801, Michael Juergen Lang - URL psywarrior2001@yahoo.com, Floyd W. Creager, ph:1-831-464-1630. Dr. Surjit Dinsa, ph:*82-1-845-485-7423, Prof. Mark S. Halfon, Nassau College, ph: 1-516-572-8013, Caryn H. Robertson, ph. 1-845-838-2693, and, if any authentic official so requests and pays postage, a *certified audiotape (*oscilloscopic voice patterns are equivalent to fingerprints) will be forwarded - of Richard Robertson proving in is own words that he is a 47 year fugitive from a crime upon which there is no originating state - or federal - statute of limitations; who is to this day still openly blaming his stepfather, while secretly blaming his youngest brother; for a crime he (Richard Robertson) committed his first felony on - in not reporting, and, who has instead taken a leadership role in persuading others, to blame upon innocent persons: accumulating a massive though only partially accounted for number of accessories after the fact (*under the law, as guilty as the original perpetrator); many of whom are still active, to this day (especially one Brian Kirk Parquette - ‘he’s all over the net’), some 47 years after Richard (####) Robertson (and his brother Bruce Robertson) started it (*in 1963 and 1964, sequentially). A verbatim transcription of the cited audiotape recording is (in real time, here and now) instantly accessible in part 3, of http://einstein.periphery.cc/machine_1 thru _4.) ______________________ (*And now this:) __________________________________________________________________________ (*Asterisked < * > parenthetical inclusions in the following documentary statements are inclusions of the author.) ____________________________________________________________________________ POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ____________________________________________________________________________ 599 Mill Street Northeast (612) 788-9221 Edward M. Carlson STUART W. ANDERSON Mayor Chief of Police February 28, 1991 Mr. Kent B. Robertson 114 Maple Street #2 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Dear Mr. Robertson: I am responding to your letter dated February 20, 1991, in which you are requesting 1964 data of an alleged sexual misconduct by one Michael Jensen. You raise the issue of whether we can confirm ever receiving a letter from Bruce Robertson (*Michael Jensen’s elder brother in law, Bruce Robertson, being the husband of Michael Jensen’s elder sister, Marilyn Jensen). Please take notice that under the Minnesota record retention system, we have lawful authority to destroy all records after six years and this has been our policy. In an effort to determine whether any of our employees who were working in 1964 and who would have some recollection of this event, I have contacted former employees. I have located one former employee who has specific recollection of this event and was the investigator for the Anoka County Attorney. I have provided him with a copy of your letter and have requested that he communicate directly with you and report what facts he has available to him. I regret that I did not have written confirmation, but I believe I have found a bona fide witness who has personal knowledge of the information you seek. If you need additional information or have questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (*Longhand signature) Stuart W. Anderson Chief of Police SWA:mld 91-046 _____________________________________________________________________________ Office of (Anoka County Icon ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY Great Seal of Minnesota INVESTIGATION DIVISION COURT HOUSE state) ANOKA, MINN. 55303 Telephone: Area code 612-421-4760 FAX # 422-7524 March 12, 1991 Mr. Kent B. Robertson 114 Maple Street #2 Santa Cruz, CA 9506 Dear Mr. Robertson: I have received your second letter dated March 2 1991. I can appreciate your interest in getting all the information possible, but again as I said in my first letter to you, I am sorry but I cannot tell you anymore than I did in that letter. I suppose the reason I remembered as much as I did is because of Michael Jensen being the suspect in the case and, of course, I have followed his (*legally eventful) track record throughout the years, up until just recently. So whenever I would have reason to think of Mike Jensen, I would always relate to the incident he had with his niece. Again, I wish I could be of no help to you but with no records available for me to review, I’m afraid I cannot be of much more help. Sincerely, (*Longhand signature) Roy Hedblad, Investigator Anoka County Attorney’s Office RH:ts (*Post script: Kent B. Robertson was residing in the state of Colorado, and had been for years, at the time of the occurrence of this Anoka <Mpls.> Minnesota crime. Kent B. Robertson has never legally been - or legally accused of - any kind of ‘suspect’ in any kind of trans-misdemeanor stated ‘misconduct’, at any time, in any place, under any <military or civilian> circumstances. Nor are their any records - neither has he <this record, K.B. Robertson, etceteras> ever said or implied - otherwise.) This is a legal, public disclaimer and caveat, directed at any and all who have already irretractably said and publicly posted - or may ever say or publicly post - otherwise. To do so, is to condemn yourself to be publicly found (historically flash-frozen), doing so. <Congratulations? Does that sound familiar?> Clue: The United States constitution sanctions not only one's right to defend self and others, but, also, the right to redress of grievances and free speech. Whereas, The Emancipation Proclamation was law 140 years ago. Night Riding trespassers - of every rank and plumage - will be (publicly) prosecuted to the full extent of - "All we have, are the rules." Moral Relativism is historical bunk.. Right & Wrong: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Perjury is as perjurists do. Derelection of duty and abuse of power, is as derelection and power abuse does, and does not. Resistance, denial, or the raimants of false authority is futile. Turn. Or burn. (*NOTE: It is a crime punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both, to falsely replicate or alter any legal records such as those presented above. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER __________________________________________________________ (There's more where this came from and plenty to go around.) "Justice is like a train that's nearly always late." - Yevgeny Yevtushenko Thank you for reading this missive.

___________________________________________ Dear D'jona and Insane Alien By Your petitioned leave: At the time I wrote the above post' date=' I misunderstood that it would occur and be stationed [u']between [/u]the above post and that of Martian (as quoted above). That is to say, the sequencing of the quote to Martian was intended to occur, addressed to each and both of you, as above described. Please pardon the quasi-anachronism. Sincerely, K.B. Robertson (Etceteras.)

Dear J'Dona and Insane Alien: Please refer to the next notably cognate and timely post by 'Martian', and consider my reply to that amiable entity and/or sentient being, as it applies to the recent posts by yourselves, in response to KaiduOrkhon, aka, Truly Yours, K. B. Robertson. Sincere gratitude, Kent Benjamin Robertson Aka Kaiduorkhon (That Rascal Puff) kraziequus@yahoo.com

_________________________ Well. Hello Martian. (Welcome to earth and if we were responsible for the mess' date=' we'd apologize?). Yours is among the more germane and astute responses we've received on this site in recent memory. There's a glorious axiom that gives substance to the importance of simplicity. The Gravity and Unified Field work at point here, which is not being evaluated, but rather dismissed out of hand as unworthy of address, consideration or evaluation; such dismissal based on the categorically unscientific presumption that it can't be what it is. D'jon and 'insane alien' have divined that the work I've authored must meet standards that it meets - and surpasses; must make predictions that it does make, and must offer explanations hitherto inexplicable, that it does explain. Insane alien and J'Dona (? of most recent occasion) openly concede not knowing or taking the time to learn of the issue they anticipate - and proselytized - the failures and shortcomings of. Insane alien has already proved himself as falsely anticipating what he mistakenly thinks, in proclaiming that 'the 4th dimension is time'; as though my (unprecedented) statement that gravity is the 4th dimension somehow must exclude time; whereas, time is motion and conversely, and is inevitably included in the statement, 'gravity is the 4th dimension' - the partial title of a work neither Insane alien nor J'Don have read, and show no interest in reading, while assertively predicting that 'the (paraphrased) forces which made me leave the first time, will most likely make me leave again.' Insane alien's self proved false assumption apparently has not given he, or J'Dona, cause for pause. The latter of the two has recently abandoned an ongoing thread at one location, choosing to leave my repartee to his earlier, respectfully challenged reasoning, unanswered at that thread (under the 'more tolerant' category of 'Psuedoscience and Metaphysics', entitled TOTAL FIELD THEORY Including Quantum Mechanics and 'particles'), and moved to join 'insane alien's speculative anticipations of my - consistently dismissed; simultaneously unevaluated, ungainsayed, specifically unaddressed work, in another discussion at another location ('Do you have a new theory'); gone on to generally reiterate previously made, generally irrelevant and otherwise inapplicable points. As though listing a series of definitions for what constitutes a worthy scientific dissertation, is germane to the specific work they - until further notice - functionally refuse to authoritatively critique or otherwise editorially disqualify... Without ever making described, qualified contact with, or otherwise objectively surveillancing what they renounce, and predict public disinterest in (effectively displacing - and discouraging - any unbiased public response). J'Dona speaks of my (paraphrased) 'previous failures to establish a following'. Whereas, I would much prefer a constructive argument addressing specific issues in the conspicuously 'untouchable' work at (notably tenacious, evasive) point, here. Imperatively structured, command authority inflected, proclamative disclaimers abound, while none are qualified... That would require a real knowledge of what they so far have - or candidly say they have - no way (interest or need) of knowing of. That is, [u']as[/u] though the work they are alluding to is something else, someplace else, based on some reasoning other than that upon which it is based, where, when and how it is, and for what reasons. This pattern of disallowing my work from becoming a familiar and tenable subject on a given website or forum has repeated itself many times in many places, since I began using the net in September of 2002, and before then, in other 'innercircles' of 'good ol' boys'. Yet, in over four decades of publishing and selling out what is now ten (highly if obscurely acclaimed) small press editions, my unprecedented work has yet to be anywhere near disqualified. On the contrary, 'my work' (which is based on the work of many others far wiser and more knowledgeable than myself) clarifies and qualifies what was previously vague and unqualified. Because it simply authenticates itself on the foundations of status quo physics, by way of recognizing and connecting previously unrecognized, unconnected facts. My (notably entrenched) uninitiated critics are speaking of an unprecedented series of recognitions, anticipating and addressing a collective series of previously unexplained, uncomprehended, misunderstood facts, as though this work is not (cannot, must not be) beyond their present knowledge and understanding. Apparently taking 'personally' the unprecedented titular statement - for example - with its correspondingly unprecedented identifications and discoveries of previously unidentified, unknown and/or misunderstood findings - that apparently repelling title including the statements: Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism are the 4th, 5th and 6th dimensions. The non-mathematical Translation of Einsteins Special & General Relativity, and the Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field Theory, The Big Bang Theory is wrong. 'Entropic Heat Death' is a Myth'. In parodying the experience of those encountering such a title (let alone the implied contents), were I not the author - discoverer/translator - of this work, I would make a point of reading it, in order to bring down the deck of cards that the unbalanced author must surely have stacked and gone bonkers over... Whereas, until such time as a given reader disassembles any such structure, item by item, or, locates the lynchpin that collapses the entire castle in the sky, I would not rest easily with what had every appearance of being a 'loose cannon', that far too many people were (and I assure you, hundreds of thousands already are; internationally) taking seriously. The following sentiment is a portion of an e-mail letter (that I am granted permission to publish) from a sponsor of Hypography Science Forums: from which I was recently permanently banned - for three days; then re-admitted, only to be permanently banned again; with the stigmatic flag 'Banned' accompanying whatever may be left of my posts on Hypography Science Forums (under the user name, That Rascal Puff). My wife went on to join and introduce herself (in the 'Introductions' at Hypography); simultaneously speaking on my behalf, due to the fact of the discontinuance of any further opportunity for Truly Yours to qualify or otherwise defend himself... ...From invasive, 'hi-jacking' posts such as 'This message deleted by GAHD. Reason: That Rascal Puff is unworthy of google' (that's what it said, in the middle of a cordial and highly informative and educationally recreational, lively dialogue on TOTAL FIELD THEORY, with an administrator named 'Turtle', an administrator named 'IrishEyes', a sponsor named 'Infamous', a forumite named Craig, and a forumite named 'Buffy' - 'Resident Slayer'. 'Turtle' had of his own intiative, humbled Truly Yours with an off-the-beaten-path, 'Lounge' thread, entitled: 'Walking Stick and Turtle Discuss Total Field Theory'. I was firstly and wrongly 'banned, permanently' for 'multiple posts', which turned out to be the error of one 'orbsycli' (administrator; cohort of adminstrator, GAHD 'the pirate'. Three days later, the Hypography Founder, one Tormod, of Oslo, Norway, who still has my highest respects, even though (due to the fact that he has since his foundership, understandably devoted more time to his growing family) he left the store generally unattended (by 'volunteer' administrators, in a 'free' forum), long enough to let the tyranny of administratively empowered elements such as 'orbsycli' and 'GAHD' preclude justice and practice creative troublemaking, name-calling and vacuously blaming and accusing, kangaroo courting, convicting and ejecting Truly Yours (for example). GAHD sent me a series of 'Private Messages', which, I soon learned, I was disallowed from posting in the forum proper. GAHD goaded and bullied Truly Yours to a point where I did post his moral trespasses, gaffes and uncalled for flourishes of the abuse of power. This is how Tormod, as CEO, was finally persuaded by the cited rowdies, to ban me yet once again, permanently (for posting GAHD's Private Message in the forum mainstream - holding him publicly accountable for what he wished to carry out 'in the dark'. He got caught, and, I got busted for busting him... There's been a lot of that going on around my work, and myself personally, for over forty years... <There's a message in there somewheres?>). As I was saying, my wife registered with Hypography (the first and only forum she's ever joined), to amenably round off a few potential misunderstandings in the 'Introduction' category of new memberships. My wife, Caryn ('Godmothered by a computer spellcheck programe which insisted on calling her 'Crayon'), closed the letter with a statement that I had influenced and contributed to the letter's content (an unsurprising matter of fact.) She was subsequently congratulated as a new member; told to log in, which she did, and then told shortly after her introduction, accompanied by the manifest posting of her message on my behalf, whereupon she was then barred from further access to any facet of Hypography. 'YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED. Reason: None'. Then, as I was saying, I continued to correspond via private e-mail with Hypography sponsor and pen pal comrade, 'Infamous' ('InfamySteadfast', or, 'Infmy'); he gave me permission to publish our e-mail correspondence. The following missive is one such letter from 'Infamous', who is a fair minded, sensitive and knowledgeably truth seeking, energetic man in his early sixties, as am I. Note his stated speculations why I was really banned (including my wife, three times in less than five weeks; due to an altogether too familiar process of blaming the <would-be, innercircle designated> victims). In this case, InfmySteadfast points out the empty reasoning of the ejection crew as being their 'suspicion' that my wife's letter was approximately co-authored with myself as the other contributor. This is true, as it was stated at the closure of the letter written by my wife and contributed to by myself. This is a given. Lacking any real reason for a series of faux pax's, the 86'ing party created a 'reason', which was no reason at all... <'suspicion' that I contributed to the content of my wife's letter...). And now this: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:34:39 -0800 (PST) From: "James Pugh" <rockytoptenor@yahoo.com> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com. Learn more Subject: Message for Tormod............... To: "Ben MacColley" <kraziequus@yahoo.com> Sir Puff; I'll need to ask Tormod if he's interested in hearing from you first, he always quite busy and I'm not sure how he will react if I just forward the message without first asking. I have some information that may explain why the problem occured with your wife's membership. I wasn't going to tell you this because I didn't want you to get upset, but now I think it's time for you to be brought up to date. When your wife delivered her first message, a few of our members had suspicions that it was really yourself that was responsible for the correspondence. Orby was the first to suggest it I believe, please don't quote me on this, I would really like to distance myself from this conflict. I personally don't have any problems communicating with you on any level, some others however, allow their egos to get in the way of benifical conversation. I wasn't going to tell you the following for some of the same reasons but I feel it necessary to now relate my former involvement in your first re-instatement. It was I that politely asked Tormod if we couldn't give you another chance at forum membership. I'm afraid that asking again would fall on deaf ears, especially because everyone knows that it was thru my efforts that you regained your membership the first time. At any rate, if Hypography can be convinced that it is not yourself impersonating your wife as a way to regain a voice in the forums, they may allow her to join the forum. Understand, I'm in no way suggesting that I concur with this paranoid delusion of theirs, I'm just relating the content of conversations I was privy to. It's really sad that some people have this need to exercise power over others. For what ever reason, it's something I've really never had the tast for. Maybe I'm the one that's weird, seems like just about everyone I know has this thing eating at them. I personally don't like to fight or exercise my will over others, I'm perfectly content to allow my fellow man to live his life in any way he wants, so long as he's not stepping on my toes, I have no desire to step on his. I'll send Tormod a message and ask him if he wants to converse with you, I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. I get the distinct impression that the real reason behind your problems at Hypography is a few of the higher ups feel threated by your superior intellect......just an opinion of mine, but I think there's some truth in this observation.................James This is an example, along with that still being exemplified by qualified, awry elements of Science Forums and Debate (SFN), of how the first and only non-mathematical translation of Einstein's most significant achievements, is being greeted, by far too many ingrate elements. (There's ominous messages of import in here somewhere's? <The Inquisition has not expired. Only it's vehicularization - and some of its age old hell raising methods - have changed.) Thank you, Martian, and whomever else it may earnestly concern, for reading this missive. Sincerely, K. B. Robertson World's #1 Einstein Groupie Apprentice to Albert - The Axe - Einstein Aegis to the Great Continental EuroAsian Green Grass RiverDragon The Last Man Standing. Vini. Vici. Entiendo.

Respectfully submit: There is a series of consistent aversions to reciprocal communications, addressed to nearly all of my posts. I am unsure how to interpret your responses, or those of D'jon, at other locations. I have provided access to my 'Home' URL and been told such provisions are 'Blatent Advertising'. I sincerely and respectfully contend that accessing Readers who care to 'click-on' to the provided information and read it - and then comment upon it, pro or con; at their volition, by definition, avoids any lengthy dissertations in any post on any forum or website. Whether or not a given Reader wishes to address the extended information and/or comment on it, is at the option of the Reader; without depositions of apparently overextensive information, as representatives of SFN consistently advise against. I am sincerely attempting to abide by your rules - as I learn of them - to the best of my ability, Provision of a Home page URL does not seem to me, to be any kind of imposition at all, to the general policy of brevity. A typically abbreviated question frequently does not allow or fairly beget, or oblige, a more extensive reply - exceptions to this rule, granted. I have been repeatedly told, in various ways, that there is no contribution on my part, as I submit there is. NOTABLY: There has been no specific address to or disqualifications of, any real or imagined equivocations - in context of the Home page URL click-on work I am referring to. The preemptive requirements are, that an extended statement is discouraged and/or disallowed at this location, and, any provision of an URL clicking on to the Home page at issue here, is prohibited. Please tell me what you think of this description of the quandary apparent that prevails here. Is not the non-posting of a proposed 'new theory', and the provision for 'guidelines' what is presented here. If this latter question is not germane to your intended meaning in saying: If not, will you - or perhaps D'Jon - provide me with what is or not intended in the responses Truly Yours is receiving from each and both of you (lately, for example)? Thanking you, I am sincerely, K. B. Robertson

An Offered Avenue of Comprehension in the Quantum Mechanical Field of 'Discontinuity' and the 'Quantum Leap' (continued)... The 5th dimension (5th ninety degree extension out of the four part, three hundred sixty degree quadrants) doesn't ‘mysteriously’ leap out of 4-D matter at all, but rather is an inevitably extrapolated, continuous - inevitably accelerated - extension of it (the 4-D mass from which it originates and by which it - the 5th dimension, is generated), manifest in an apparently discontinuous unit - "Plank's constant 'h' factor"; a discontinuous unit - photon - always having the same value, because it is consistently the 5th ninety degree unit extending out of the 4 physical dimensions that preceded and generated it. The 5th ninety degree units (photons; 'Planck's "constant 'h' factor") moving at right angles - outside the fully occupied - 'no vacancy here, beyond four 90o quadrants, constituting a - system: projections of and from the 4-D charges ('particles') are called photons, or 'quanta' - the smallest unit of energy known to academia. The described dynamic does not actually contradict continuous field theory (as popular perceived and alleged), but rather, is a result of and generated by the 4-D space-time continuum. The 5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism respectively, are accelerating, just as the source from which they invariably originate (4-D matter), but the expansion of electricity and magnetism is exponentially extended from 4-D matter and therefore accelerating at a much faster - quantum leaping - rate. An illusion of 'contradiction' of continuous field theory, whereas the apparently 'discontinuous' particle is actually a 4-dimensionally and continuously expanding charge of electricity which generates 5 and 6 dimensional, 90o quadrants - photons - at right angles from it's 4-D boundaries. (The record may be 'redundant' in the presentation of this issue, whereas, the repetitive descriptions wish to approach the unprecedented solution from several different perspectives. Thank you.) This record describes the above explained ephemerality (the dynamics of Planck's 'constant "h" factor' known as the 'quantum leap'): as the 'translatory moment' - when the 5th 90o unit of electricity 'quantum leaps' out of the 4-D quadrant of 90o that generates furthermore, 90o of electricity, followed by 90o of magnetism; i.e. - the 5th and 6th dimensions of electricity and magnetism, respectively. Comprehensively and continuously emitted in discontinuous units, called 'quanta' and/or 'photons'; often referred to as 'photo-electric effect'. The 'translatory moment' is also when the apparently 'standing field' of actually expanding (ever acclerating) 4-D matter, projects the 5th and 6th dimensions of electromagnetism, abruptly accelerates beyond the accleration-rate of 4-D matter (an apparent 'standing field' <'obviously physical matter, corporeal reality at large, is not expanding'>, emitting the recognized electromagnetic field; in discrete - 90o units); 'quantum leaping' (via the 5th and 6th 90o extrapolated units of electricity and magnetism:) at light speed (relative to the apparently 'standing <'static'> field' from which it originates and by which it - electromagetism - is generated). (Refer illustration of logarithmic spiral <not to be confused with the spiral of Archimedes, which is not accelerating, as the logarithmical, exponentially expanding spiral is - acclerating; made up of four 90o quadrants, each of which is exponentially acclerated from the first 90o quadrant to the fourth 90o quadrant, fulfilling a manifest charge. Illustration obtained from entering 'Geometry Junkyard' in Google. (It also appears to be an expression of what is called the 'Golden Rectangle'...) This shape, constructed by inscribing circular arcs in a spiral tiling of squares, resembles but is not quite the same as a logarithmic spiral. A similar spiral is used as the Sybase Inc. logo. (The illustration is not transferrable from it's location on delphi, to this location on SFN, or, if it is transferable, I am ignorant of how that is accomplished.) Above is a geometric expression of exponential - extrapolative - spiral progression from a center source (in this case a rectangle rather than a circle). It is approximately the structure of a nautilus shell - pompilius nautilis linnae, as well as any number of sea shells, snails and perhaps innumerable spiral shapes as they occur in Nature. Referencing the above geometric expression; disregarding the rectangular center, there are four 90o quadrants exponentially progressing in clockwise motion, ending with the vertical straight line - where the evolution of the four segments preceding the vertical line fullfill a 360o whole. 360o divided by 90o equals four, followed by a 5th 90o 'pie chart' shape, extrapolated at right angles out of and far exceeding the area of the four 90o quadrants preceding it. Repeat: note that the 5th 90o component occurs beyond 360o, and that, by way of extrapolation - exponential acceleration - the 5th component, although identical in 90o shape, very abruptly transforms to a size much larger than than all four combined 90o quadrants preceding it. When the four 'sliced pie quarters' are gathered together in an equilateral circle , they complete a 360 degree whole. This represents a so called 'particle', more appropriately described as a 4 dimensional 'charge' of field energy. The 5th section of 90o occurs outside of and at right angles to the described quadrant of four 90o segments. This record offers the (above diagrammatic) geometric expression - of an extrapolating spiral - as an example of 4-Dimensional acceleration of matter, generating a fifth 90o segment, representing the 5th dimension of electricity, contiguously extending - quantum leaping - at right angles out of the 360o, 4-Dimensional system from which it originates and by which it is generated; while the 6th 90o segment of 4-D charge-generated magnetism, exponentially extends at right angles out of the 5th. The 90o quadrant extending from the 5th is all the more acclerated - a 6th 90o quadrant, moving at right angles to the preceding 5th. This record submits that the accelerated extrapolation of the 5th and 6th 90o quadrants at right angles from the 4-D 'charge', or 'particle', constitutes Planck's constant h factor, and, why it always has the same value (the emitted 5th & 6th 90o quadrants at right angles from the 4-D charge from which it originates and by which it is generated. The setting is one of compatability of discontinuous quanta as being the result of continuous field dynamics. I submit that this translation self evidently fulfills the context of this thread. Thank you for reading this missive. - K.B. Robertson

"Have you read the first post in this thread?" ____________________________ Yes. I have read the first post in this thread. Please instruct me on how this is a point for or against those which I wish to make here - and in several other locations. Thank you. K. B. Robertson

Yes. I have a new theory. Based on and authenticated within - previously unrecognized facets of - the foundations of Classical & Contemporary Experimental-Academic Physics. It is entitled 'Gravity, Electricity & Magnetism are the 4th, 5th & 6th Dimensions: The non-mathematically translated Special & General Relativity, and the Reinstatement of Einstein's Presently Abandoned Unified Field: the Big Bang Theory Is Wrong. Entropic Heat Death is a Myth.' To the best of my knowledge I am not allowed to share this freely accessible information with anyone on this website, because it has been pronounced to be 'Blatent Advertising'. I have been admonished: 'None of that'. Clearly I misunderstand some very rudimentary communications or other procedure(s). I respectfully request further instruction in this matter. Perhaps my motives are misunderstood. I wish not to broker, sell or otherwise merchandise anything. I wish to access whomever may wish to click on a provided URL, to a source of anthological and narrated information; that it may be constructively criticized, disqualified, augmented, edited, or otherwise commented upon. Thank you for reading this missive. Sincerely, K. B. Robertson kraziequus@yahoo.com