-
The Official JOKES SECTION :)
Hi gene Is poetically rhyming humor ok? Hope this works: (Variations on this thought provoking vignette appear else-where on the net. Copyright 1979 - 2009, by K. B. Robertson. All rights reserved. With proper accreditation for authorship, may be reproduced and distributed for recreational or educational purposes. Condensed book <not for sale> freely accessible at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie) For more cost free rhythm and reason, please consider a recreational season that resonantly sings beyond theories of strings. From Euclid's straight line shine to Isaac's golden apple, and Albert's inspired geodesic grapple. A catchy little tune that most anyone can croon, by the curved silvery light of Albert's expeditionary moon. Dr. Einstein's waking inspiration may yet sweep the sleeping nation at the break of dawn and the slightest provocation. An unrecognized solution that could start a peaceful revolution. Big Bang Gangology’s further confirmation of their favorite libation - more denial and debate with the orphaned Steady State. Behold Albert's resurrected smart bomb with enduring aplomb. Benevolent bomb leaves all the buildings and people intact; takes 4-D space-time to get'em back on track . Asked the teacher what gravity was, an' all he said is what gravity does. Said I wanna know why, not how things fall. Teacher said nobody knows that one at all. Asked the people on the 6 O'Clock news; they said on that we have no views. Same thing happened in a physics lesson - a picture of Newton gave a puzzled expression. Still wanted to know what gravity is, so I went outside and continued the quiz. Asked a mathematician and he took all day saying gravity is numbers. So I lit one up and, went into suspension, tintanambulating beyond the 3rd dimension. The answer appeared as a gentle kiss, so I wrote another poem and it goes like this... A Brief History of Rhyme - A Celebration of Space-Time Almalgamation Liberated From extended Fragmentation (The dreaded thread) Poetic science appliance. Einstein's presently abandoned Unified Field reinstated w'out mathematics. The joining of Field with Quantum Mechanics. The exclusion of politics from science. A scientific paradigm shift alliance. Scientific 'mainstream' panics at quantum mechanics Democritus foresaw the invisible atom, but since then his discovery is found with substratrum. From antiquity, and ubiquity the continuous wave was the rave. Faraday found the cathode ray. Thompson uncovered electrons one day. Rutherford saw protons in a different way. Understood Maxwell's waves beneath the celestial hood, discovered electromagnetic fields as no one thought he would. The wave emitting electron could not be subdivided - at first it was whispered, then openly confided. Yet along came smaller mysterious articles, of Max Planck’s curiously indivisible 'particles' : Transforming a known world of electrostatics into a truculent tangle of quantum mechanics. Conceptual doors were opened for the entrance of protons, but no comprehensive vacancy for the residential photons. Other atomic tenants varied in weight, height and disguise, but the photon is always the same null value and size. A deteriorating atom might change its balance or valence, while the unchanging photon showed no such talents. Vigils are kept to find it changing its station, while its stubborn identity confirms in black body radiation. At dollar conventions where no change is invited, twenty nickels sit down to an audience excited. The quantum takes for granted inclusion, while greenbacks resent the currency intrusion. To and from spherical shells the electron darts - while the unchanged quantum arrives before it departs. If you’re looking for a message in here, it’s of Max Planck’s quanta and Niels Bohr’s spheres. Invincible in principle, Newton’s Mechanics are sure as shooting, while quantum mechanics are robbing and lootin'. Evolutionary experiments are eclectic, but the final conclusions are photo-electric. As though these convulusions are not enough, reality panned out some other stuff. The only certain universal permanancy, is Einstein’s constant light-speed and Heisenberg’s indeterminacy. Einstein’s fort was special & general relativity, while his Nobel Prize was for photo-electricity. Uncle Albert having firstly proven to be right - ahead of Brownian motion and the speed of light. This century old issue of size is how Einstein won the Nobel Prize - how the peace loving master-blaster stayed alive, in the timely year of 1905. Anaxgoras of pre biblical days took big and little to greater heights and stays, he said "There’s always something larger than large, and always something smaller than small." Perhaps the smallest-large statement of all. May this admonition of illusion be this brief sonnet’s conclusion. The 20th century path has been rough - to the point of surrendering enough of this stuff. - K. B. Robertson, Copyright 1979 & 2009 All rights reserved. This poetry or its links may be used for non commercial educational and recreational purposes, providing that proper accreditation is extended to the author. Though this ballad may be spiritual or mental, any semblance to education is purely coincidental. Readers are invited to this paragon of camp, may the poetic winner be rewarded with writer's cramp? Whoever may think that here is no thought, please feel free to continue and give yer best shot. For those who would approach science by an alternative path, you may consider Einstein's Relativity without any math: http://www.toequest.com/forum/toetheory-articles/2516-total-field-theory-reinstatement-cosmological-constant-steady-state-theories.html
-
Do you have a new theory?
Date: 2007-04-12 T20:47:08 NEW CLUES ABOUT THE NATURE OF DARK MATTER: Einstein May Have Been Right After All: The good news from NASA's Hubble Space Telescope is that Einstein was right — maybe. A strange form of energy called "dark energy" is looking a little more like the repulsive force that Einstein theorized in an attempt to balance the universe against its own gravity. Even if Einstein turns out to be wrong, the universe's dark energy probably won't destroy the universe any sooner than about 30 billion years from now, say Hubble researchers. "Right now we're about twice as confident than before that Einstein's cosmological constant is real, or at least dark energy does not appear to be changing fast enough (if at all) to cause an end to the universe anytime soon," says Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore. Riess used Hubble to find nature's own "weapons of mass destruction" — very distant supernovae that exploded when the universe was less than half its current age. The apparent brightness of a certain type of supernova gives cosmologists a way to measure the expansion rate of the universe at different times in the past. Riess and his team joined efforts with the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey (GOODS) program, the largest deep galaxy survey attempted by Hubble to date, to turn the Space Telescope into a supernova search engine on an unprecedented scale. In the process, they discovered 42 new supernovae in the GOODS area, including 6 of the 7 most distant known. Cosmologists understand almost nothing about dark energy even though it appears to comprise about 70 percent of the universe. They are desperately seeking to uncover its two most fundamental properties: its strength and its permanence. In a paper to be published in the Astrophysical Journal, Riess and his collaborators have made the first meaningful measurement of the second property, its permanence. Currently, there are two leading interpretations for the dark energy as well as many more exotic possibilities. It could be an energy percolating from empty space as Einstein's theorized "cosmological constant," an interpretation which predicts that dark energy is unchanging and of a prescribed strength. An alternative possibility is that dark energy is associated with a changing energy field dubbed "quintessence." This field would be causing the current acceleration — a milder version of the inflationary episode from which the early universe emerged. When astronomers first realized the universe was accelerating, the conventional wisdom was that it would expand forever. However, until we better understand the nature of dark energy—its properties—other scenarios for the fate of the universe are possible. If the repulsion from dark energy is or becomes stronger than Einstein's prediction, the universe may be torn apart by a future "Big Rip," during which the universe expands so violently that first the galaxies, then the stars, then planets, and finally atoms come unglued in a catastrophic end of time. Currently this idea is very speculative, but being pursued by theorists. At the other extreme, a variable dark energy might fade away and then flip in force such that it pulls the universe together rather then pushing it apart. This would lead to a "big crunch" where the universe ultimately implodes. "This looks like the least likely scenario at present," says Riess. Understanding dark energy and determining the universe's ultimate fate will require further observations. Hubble and future space telescopes capable of looking more than halfway across the universe will be needed to achieve the necessary precision. The determination of the properties of dark energy has become the key goal of astronomy and physics today. CONTACT Don Savage NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC (Phone: 202-358-1547; E-mail: dsavage@hq.nasa.gov) Ray Villard Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD (Phone: 410-338-4514; E-mail: villard@stsci.edu) Adam Riess Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD (Phone: 410-338-4509; E-mail: ariess@stsci.edu)
-
Do you have a new theory?
From: RascalPuff (Kaiduorkhon) 12:51 am To: ALL (1 of 1) 3.1 Professor Paul Dirac's proposed anti-particle (electric charge, referred to as a 'particle') and its proposed explosion upon contact with a conventional 'particle' (electric charge) may be an ongoing event constituting the status quo of reality as we experience it... Consider a sphere such as a macrocosmic planet, the sun, or a microcosmic system such as an electron 'particle' (electromagnetic charge). Each generates an electromagnetic field, wherein the magnetic portion of that field emanates in a northerly direction from the north pole of the issued sphere, loops around it in a circular motion which suddenly is traveling in a southerly direction upon reaching and passing the ecliptic middle of the issued sphere. Whereupon the continuing loop completes a full circle around the planet, sun or electron that generates, maintains and sustains it, said magnetic field then entering the southern pole of it's given system of origin to resume a northerly direction through the axial center of and relative to the polar system at issue. This described dynamic represents an ongoing cyle of magnetism generated by and emanating from, around, and back into the system that generates, maintains and sustains it. The sphere itself, en toto, is stablized by a magnetic field which is constantly moving in opposite directions - northerly out of, then looping around to a southerly course, and back into and through the issued spherical entity, ad infinitum. The reverse of directions - from north to south - occurs at the ecliptic (equatorial bisection) of the issued, spherical electron, planet or star Each given system is also emitting electrical energy at right angles from the system that the magnetic field is parallel to. These directional reversals and discharges may correspond to the occurrence of quantum emissions. In the four dimensional setting that Einstein has assigned to all material systems, these two hemispheres are oppositely interacting with each other ('as anti-particles'), resulting in the Dirac-predicted explosion, constituting nothing less than the omnidirectional expansion of 4-D systems; not excluding the consideration that mass increases with velocity. (This is an unprecedented explanation of the combined work of Planck, Dirac and Einstein. More will be said about this later. Copyright by K.B.Robertson 2/2007 and 12/'79). Further info accessible at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
-
Do you have a new theory?
Dear Elas: You just summed up the status quo in transitional physics today: "There seems to be considerable misunderstanding of the current state of our knowledge of physics." Dark matter. Gravitons. String Theory. The list of tachyons, leprechans and put ons goes on and on... Most of the so called 'new age physics' is frantically straight faced, straw grasping hypotheses... Including the so called 'big bang theory' - which is an hypothesis, and a very poor one at that (there is no common center from which the observed expanding universe, expands. This is not the signature of an explosion. It is the signature of a repellng force in accordance with Newton's laws of 'attractive force', but acting in the opposite direction). We often hear of Einstein's abandonment of his Cosmological Constant; we do not hear that he was back to working on it until his passing in 1955 at Princeton. There's more to this of course. A lot of it is TOTAL FIELD THEORY at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie Thank you and yours for being, and for reading this missive.
-
Do you have a new theory?
I have a generalised new perspective on - re-cognition of a series of relatively old - tried and true theories; where the mathematics and predictions are already well established. That is, the required predictions and mathematical confirmations are already in place as the status quo in contemporary theoretical and astrophysical science. http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
-
Do you have a new theory?
Dear zeropointquarklinda: the first url is a crtique on Einstein by a guy named Hutchison, who, uhm, speaks for himself.Compliments of 'bascule', of Science Forums and Debate - SFN, http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128 The following URL clicks on to TOTAL FIELD THEORY, by Yours Truly http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie A pop-up ad may occur on the first click of the above URL, after X'ing that out, a second click takes you there.
-
Do you have a new theory?
Dear zeropointquarklinda: the first url is a crtique on Einstein by a guy named Hutchison, who, uhm, speaks for himself.Compliments of 'bascule', of Science Forums and Debate - SFN, http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128 The following URL clicks on to TOTAL FIELD THEORY, by Yours Truly http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie
-
The Official "Introduce Yourself" Thread
After recently receiving several introductory notices via email from SFN, I gratefully introduce myself as That Rascal Puff. I'm a science writer and author of a number of small press published works on Einstein's relativity and ethnology. Tormod, Turtle, GAHD and others are my former correspondents. The 'Posting Rules' say that I may post new threads, replies, attachments, or edit my posts. I'm not sure whether to do this or not. Uhm. Dear Hearts: Is this a reinstatement, or an error of some kind?
-
Do you have a new theory?
Dear ZeroPoint Quark Linda: Thank you for your request. Unfortunately I do not have permission of the incumbent administrators to refer Readers here (via 'click-on URL' or other URL address) to one chapter - or for that matter the entirety of my condensed version of my 627 page, 45 year, 10 sold out edition, small press, internationally distributed work. I have already been chastized for posting extensive messages, hence I am unable to fulfill your complimentary request. Mr. Bill Hutchinson - EINSTEIN WAS WRONG!! AND EVIL!!! is permitted to be clicked on, but not my work gainsaying his and that of the Final Theory, written by an Australian who begins to parallel my work (feigning ignorance of it) and then perilously breaks away from it into a communications pudding that fails to set up whether its chilled or heated. I do not understand the inequity of allowing Bill Hutchinson's black magic and anti semitism to be clicked on here, while - so far - any such suggestion or action on my part, regarding my work, has been disallowed (there seems to be some sort of an idea that I'm trying to sell what I've sold out ten times and have always freely given away also. It used to be entitled THE NEW GRAVITY, then it went on to being GRAVITY IS THE 4th DIMENSION: Extraterrestrial Physics 101, then GRAVITY, ELECTRICITY & MAGNETISM are the 4TH, 5TH & 6th DIMENSIONS: THE NON-MATHEMATICAL REINSTATEMENT OF EINSTEIN'S PRESENTLY ABANDONED UNIFIED FIELD: THE BIG BANG THEORY IS WRONG: ENTROPIC HEAT DEATH IS A MYTH. Presently I call it TOTAL FIELD THEORY. It's posted and can be freely accessed, but the predominant management forbids it. Yes. I have a 'new' theory, based on previous non recognitions of the foundations of classic and contemporary physics. But I'm not allowed to connect readers of 'Do You Have A New Theory' to it. :eek Thank you for asking.
-
Do you have a new theory?
Hoping this information corroborates the edifications of J'Dona, Severian and anyone else who couldn't agree with them more, including Truly Yours. An introduction to an introduction: THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS. by Professor Frank Pajares, as remarkably condensed by Thomas S. Kuhn. An advised required reading to anyone interested in and/or involved in any of the sciences, particularly pragmatic and theoretical physics. With kudos to Mr. David DubinaSix, of Alaska (nor is this the first riveting package of information that Mr. Six has forwarded to this record ) This same URL clicker occurs near the close of this dissertation on TOTAL FIELD THEORY. If you don't enjoy snowboarding, skiiing, ice or rollerskating, golf or baseball, horseback riding, hockey - or reality in general - you can probly skip this intro to the introduction (It Requires High School Reading Skills - far more challenging than TV GUIDE, for example...) Otherwise, please relax. Clear your mind, and, arm yerself with a large container of popcorn and/or chips and a non-alcoholic beverage (You may slide 'n glide, sea 'n ski, earth, wind and fire when ready, Skidly?). http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/kuhnsyn.html This URL sometimes lands on fine print which may be enlarged via clicking on the 'View' mode in the upper left hand corner of your moniter. Adjust 'Text size'. (So easy, even a Geico advertising administrative executive can do it?) The record was inspired to proffer the above (may I say 'riveting') URL, in the spirit of the immediate above quoted message posted by MARTIAN, and the perhaps majority who may agree (Sorta like the chicken soup, that can't hurt any, and, may help?). Thank you for being here, and there. I am gratefully and respectfully, That Rascal Puff, Aka K. B. Robertson. (Of course my TOTAL FIELD THEORY <is not an hypothesis> is not presented here, neither is its URL, though it is, in my humble estimation, completely ingenous and germane as an issue in this thread. With permission of the adminstrators <including J'Dona and Severian?>, it would be an honor and a privilege to bring one chapter of my book to this thread, and, should it not meet the administrations requirements, it follows that it won't be posted for very long if at all. I request this opportunity, that those who will, may draw their own conclusions. Thank you - one and all, large and small - once again. - That Rascal Poof )
-
The Official "Introduce Yourself" Thread
SaSke private messaged yer 37 and bird like fly but not fly like bird.
-
The Official "Introduce Yourself" Thread
Lepton Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Auckland, New Zealand Posts: 0 hey that guy in ur avata is frm "death note" isnt it?? ________________________________________ Ya. it mkes 2 " " n'ow. NewZeaxCanadaconeXXion. 11 months of AA koded konTempt. Ave#2atesitePaswrd. Trans'helback-equatory. Demands rite 2.2 AA dbl 'death note' jury trials. Eel ave is way- X-ray. We'l see'l. (Nadie poder cojer el cajones. Immuno a le 'n carcero.) appy returns on new # 1-667 stalking grounds. Jck zes velcom b'AckAk.
-
The Official "Introduce Yourself" Thread
From: That Rascal Puff (Kaiduorkhon) 1:04 am To: ALL Of Justice: "Do not wait for the last judgement. It takes place every day." - Albert Camus "May your nearly prepared breakfast toast always land butterside up." - That Rascal Puff Fully aware that any staffer may crisply gaffe this post from its placement here in the Intro department of SFN, humble scribe may only hope this protean public message may serve the casual interest, if not the recreation, studied probity - or education - of whomever may honor it with the equity of a simple browse, perusal or scan. For more seasoned forumites and arbiters, it may be recognised and amenably qualifed not only as a tenably continuing introduction, but also a progressive rounding off and closure of a marathon if figurative, microcosmic socio-political collapsation, and moral disentanglement. 27.1 (*NOTE: It is a crime punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both, to falsely replicate or alter any legal records such as those presented in the following documentary. <This post was installed 22 February 2006 Wednesday. Narrative subject to revision or amplification.>) GREETINGS: Due to long standing, increasingly pejorative, here and gone; zig-zag; now you see it, now you don't - blight on the world wide web and the internet, the following documentary message is proffered as a Public Service. Allowing the Reader to draw - activate or recreate - her or his own conclusions. Although many persons and circumstances are responsible for inspiring - if not requiring - the posting of the below delivered documentary messages (There's much more where they came from; originating in as many stations of authority), one Brian Kirk Parquette ('Bkparque', and the <'square baby' changing> company that keeps him <'Ver7ein'>), since December 1999, is (sometimes anonymously; or impersonating someone else) at the center source of - and the inspiration for - the http://www.net peppered revilements (diatribe, put-downs, gotcha's, false rumor mongering, muck making, name calling, hook, sinker 'n line stealing, merit parroting, impotently preponderant, self rescindent, orifice retentive, bell book & candle plagiarizing, stuck-fixated beezlebub finger pointing, prevarication stationed, sadomasochistic-narcissisistic, call to sessions on 'reverse confession' obsession < r squared multi-dimentia [absolute ground zero free fire zoning, dragon's tail tickling, flash pointing, massively critical], fissile pi [carrying itself out to it's last high resolution hacked out fractal decimal p'oink] > ) AT ISSUE, HERE: TO WHOMEVER IT MAY CONCERN (Be they foreign, or domestic...) *Asterisked <* > parenthetical inclusions in the following statements are refinations of the author, K. B. Robertson <Record keeper>.) ________________________________________________ To: From: Columbia Heights District Police Kent B. Robertson Chief Stuart Anderson 114 Maple St. #2 559 Mill Street NorthEast Santa Cruz, CA. Columbia Heights, Minnesota 95060 55421 20 February 1991 Wednesday Dear Chief Anderson: This letter represents an urgent inquiry in search of possible records confirmation that may exist in your department’s files, contingent to an ongoing federal suit concerning a nearly thirty year old, extant series of ongoing, conspiratorial pedophile felonies; originating in the early ‘60s and continuing to the date of this writing. Mr. Bruce Robertson, a defendant in ongoing litigation, alleges that he wrote a letter of complaint to your department Police Chief, in late 1964, regarding the allegory rape of his four year old daughter, by one juvenile, Michael Jensen, of Columbia Heights (Mpls) Minnesota. This letter of complaint was in fact seen by several (currently) affirming witnesses in 1964, but there is no confirmation that it was ever sent-to or received-by, your department. Mr. Bruce Robertson’s return address at the time he says he wrote this letter of complaint to your then-incumbent Police Chief, was 1624 Iris Street, Denver/Lakewood, Colorado. The letter alleged that the subjected rape had occurred some six months earlier, under your jurisdiction in the Columbia Heights District; at the residence of Michael Jensen’s mother. Does your department have any record of any such letter of complaint from Bruce Robertson, about his (teen aged) brother-in-law, Michael Jensen? Having learned of this rape six months after the fact, of course Bruce Robertson, the father of the alleged raped child, was legally obliged to report the crime, which he insists that he did. Bruce Robertson alleges that he sent the cited letter to your department in late (Nov. - Dec.) 1964, and which letter Bruce Robertson also insists, resulted in legal juvenile court actions against Michael Jensen of the Columbia Heights District, who, at that time, was 15 years of age. There are updated and complex contingencies of this stated event which *nullify standard limitations statutes, insofar as an ongoing conspiracy seems to be directly related to this otherwise nearly thirty year old event (*refer FEDERAL CODE, TITLE 18, CONSPIRACY). Although the non-recovery of any such record would not resolve a great deal, its recovery confirmation would certainly clear Bruce Robertson’s name (*as well as myself and anyone else besides Michael Jensen, if in fact these allegations are true) and clarify his allegations, if this cited letter (*and incident) could simply be confirmed to have in fact been received by your office in the ascribed time-frame; all the better if a manifest copy of such letter could be tendered. Any response from your office regarding this urgent inquiry will be of great import in the subjected, pending 17th (*Federal) District litigations (*at that time, Congressman Leon E. Panetta, later succeeded by present 17th District Congressman, Sam Farr). Awaiting your much needed reply, I am very respectfully yours, (*Long hand and typewritten signature.). Kent Benjamin Robertson (Brother of the defendant). 114 Maple Street, Santa Cruz, CA. 95060 ph: 408-459-6709 ______________________________________ (*Asterisked parenthetical inclusions in the following statements are refinations of the author.) (*The original copies of the following documents from police officials in Anoka, Minnesota are on file and/or witnessed by 17th Federal District Congressman’s Aides, Rachel Dann and Craig O’Donnel (1-831-429-1976), as well as the staff (*Attn. Ms. Meridith) of the Record’s Department, Santa Cruz Police Department, Santa Cruz, California: including a number of distinguished citizens - Yvonne SueEllen Young, retired legal secretary, ph: 1-559-449-0801, Michael Juergen Lang - URL psywarrior2001@yahoo.com, Floyd W. Creager, ph:1-831-464-1630. Dr. Surjit Dinsa, ph:*82-1-845-485-7423, Prof. Mark S. Halfon, Nassau College, ph: 1-516-572-8013, Caryn H. Robertson, ph. 1-845-838-2693, and, if any authentic official so requests and pays postage, a *certified audiotape (*oscilloscopic voice patterns are equivalent to fingerprints) will be forwarded - of Richard Robertson proving in is own words that he is a 47 year fugitive from a crime upon which there is no originating state - or federal - statute of limitations; who is to this day still openly blaming his stepfather, while secretly blaming his youngest brother; for a crime he (Richard Robertson) committed his first felony on - in not reporting, and, who has instead taken a leadership role in persuading others, to blame upon innocent persons: accumulating a massive though only partially accounted for number of accessories after the fact (*under the law, as guilty as the original perpetrator); many of whom are still active, to this day (especially one Brian Kirk Parquette - ‘he’s all over the net’), some 47 years after Richard (####) Robertson (and his brother Bruce Robertson) started it (*in 1963 and 1964, sequentially). A verbatim transcription of the cited audiotape recording is (in real time, here and now) instantly accessible in part 3, of http://einstein.periphery.cc/machine_1 thru _4.) ______________________ (*And now this:) __________________________________________________________________________ (*Asterisked < * > parenthetical inclusions in the following documentary statements are inclusions of the author.) ____________________________________________________________________________ POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS ____________________________________________________________________________ 599 Mill Street Northeast (612) 788-9221 Edward M. Carlson STUART W. ANDERSON Mayor Chief of Police February 28, 1991 Mr. Kent B. Robertson 114 Maple Street #2 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Dear Mr. Robertson: I am responding to your letter dated February 20, 1991, in which you are requesting 1964 data of an alleged sexual misconduct by one Michael Jensen. You raise the issue of whether we can confirm ever receiving a letter from Bruce Robertson (*Michael Jensen’s elder brother in law, Bruce Robertson, being the husband of Michael Jensen’s elder sister, Marilyn Jensen). Please take notice that under the Minnesota record retention system, we have lawful authority to destroy all records after six years and this has been our policy. In an effort to determine whether any of our employees who were working in 1964 and who would have some recollection of this event, I have contacted former employees. I have located one former employee who has specific recollection of this event and was the investigator for the Anoka County Attorney. I have provided him with a copy of your letter and have requested that he communicate directly with you and report what facts he has available to him. I regret that I did not have written confirmation, but I believe I have found a bona fide witness who has personal knowledge of the information you seek. If you need additional information or have questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (*Longhand signature) Stuart W. Anderson Chief of Police SWA:mld 91-046 _____________________________________________________________________________ Office of (Anoka County Icon ANOKA COUNTY ATTORNEY Great Seal of Minnesota INVESTIGATION DIVISION COURT HOUSE state) ANOKA, MINN. 55303 Telephone: Area code 612-421-4760 FAX # 422-7524 March 12, 1991 Mr. Kent B. Robertson 114 Maple Street #2 Santa Cruz, CA 9506 Dear Mr. Robertson: I have received your second letter dated March 2 1991. I can appreciate your interest in getting all the information possible, but again as I said in my first letter to you, I am sorry but I cannot tell you anymore than I did in that letter. I suppose the reason I remembered as much as I did is because of Michael Jensen being the suspect in the case and, of course, I have followed his (*legally eventful) track record throughout the years, up until just recently. So whenever I would have reason to think of Mike Jensen, I would always relate to the incident he had with his niece. Again, I wish I could be of no help to you but with no records available for me to review, I’m afraid I cannot be of much more help. Sincerely, (*Longhand signature) Roy Hedblad, Investigator Anoka County Attorney’s Office RH:ts (*Post script: Kent B. Robertson was residing in the state of Colorado, and had been for years, at the time of the occurrence of this Anoka <Mpls.> Minnesota crime. Kent B. Robertson has never legally been - or legally accused of - any kind of ‘suspect’ in any kind of trans-misdemeanor stated ‘misconduct’, at any time, in any place, under any <military or civilian> circumstances. Nor are their any records - neither has he <this record, K.B. Robertson, etceteras> ever said or implied - otherwise.) This is a legal, public disclaimer and caveat, directed at any and all who have already irretractably said and publicly posted - or may ever say or publicly post - otherwise. To do so, is to condemn yourself to be publicly found (historically flash-frozen), doing so. <Congratulations? Does that sound familiar?> Clue: The United States constitution sanctions not only one's right to defend self and others, but, also, the right to redress of grievances and free speech. Whereas, The Emancipation Proclamation was law 140 years ago. Night Riding trespassers - of every rank and plumage - will be (publicly) prosecuted to the full extent of - "All we have, are the rules." Moral Relativism is historical bunk.. Right & Wrong: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Perjury is as perjurists do. Derelection of duty and abuse of power, is as derelection and power abuse does, and does not. Resistance, denial, or the raimants of false authority is futile. Turn. Or burn. (*NOTE: It is a crime punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both, to falsely replicate or alter any legal records such as those presented above. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/ EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER __________________________________________________________ (There's more where this came from and plenty to go around.) "Justice is like a train that's nearly always late." - Yevgeny Yevtushenko Thank you for reading this missive.
-
Do you have a new theory?
___________________________________________ Dear D'jona and Insane Alien By Your petitioned leave: At the time I wrote the above post' date=' I misunderstood that it would occur and be stationed [u']between [/u]the above post and that of Martian (as quoted above). That is to say, the sequencing of the quote to Martian was intended to occur, addressed to each and both of you, as above described. Please pardon the quasi-anachronism. Sincerely, K.B. Robertson (Etceteras.)
-
Do you have a new theory?
Dear J'Dona and Insane Alien: Please refer to the next notably cognate and timely post by 'Martian', and consider my reply to that amiable entity and/or sentient being, as it applies to the recent posts by yourselves, in response to KaiduOrkhon, aka, Truly Yours, K. B. Robertson. Sincere gratitude, Kent Benjamin Robertson Aka Kaiduorkhon (That Rascal Puff) kraziequus@yahoo.com
KaiduOrkhon
Senior Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited