granpa

Hence "from the rockets point of view"

What difference does it make whether God exists or not?

Notice that neither observer can actually "see" what is happening on Andromeda now. The argument is not about what can be "seen", it is purely about what different observers consider to be contained in their instantaneous present moment. The two observers observe the same, two million year old events in their telescopes but the moving observer must assume that events at the present moment on Andromeda are a day or two in advance of those in the present moment of the stationary observer. So when I start moving (in the right direction) my calculation of the time on Andromeda moves forward a few days and when I stop moving it moves backward a few days

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-Andromeda-paradox https://en.m.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special_Relativity/Simultaneity,_time_dilation_and_length_contraction#The_Andromeda_Paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RietdijkPutnam_argument

Okay so it's later. Now reverse the process. Put the brakes on the rocket and what happens then?

Consider what happens to a clock very very far away from the accelerating rocket The further away the clock is the more out of sync it becomes consider what happens during the acceleration from the Rockets point of view. What time does the clock start with. What time does the clock end with

Consider what happens to a clock very very far away from the accelerating rocket The further away the clock is the more out of sync it becomes

Some of the clocks run backwards from the point of view of the accelerating rocket Consider what happens to a clock very very far away from the accelerating rocket The further away the clock is the more out of sync it becomes

You didnt know that?

Geometry = multidimensional math with an extra Axiom to define the length of the hypotenuse

Entaglement doesnt need space Events are the indivisible atoms of existence Events interacting with one another by entanglement would be the logical thing to exist beyond space

But there is already such a field. It's called gravity. Also how do you explain the frame-dragging

Something is known Beyond a reasonable doubt if the laws of cause and effect make it impossible for it not to be true. I KNOW with certainty that a 2 headed coin will come up heads if flipped. If the coin has a heads and a tails then I dont know what it will come up as but I KNOW the probability is 50/50. If I have 3 coins in my pocket, one with 2 heads, another with 2 tails, and another with one head and one tail and I pull one out at random and, without looking at it, flip it then I dont know the probability but I still KNOW the bayesian probability is 50/50.

You won't take us hot or cold

Yes be a non conformist like us. Just dress and act exactly like we do and listen to all the same music we do. Atheism/Theism is a false dichotomy. The question is not whether you should believe this or believe that. The real question is why should you believe anything. Why not know instead? Why believe it will rain today when you can know that it might rain today? Believing anything is completely unnecessary If you really want to study the Bible scientifically then start here http://religion.wikia.com/wiki/At-a-glance/The_Bible/101

you think entanglement works in and through space? it is clearly beyond space http://phys.org/news/2015-05-spacetime-built-quantum-entanglement.html

How do you explain entanglement?

What else could possibly be beyond space? Where do you think strings come from?

its called emergence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

Beyond time is meaningless. Beyond space is a spaceless sea of khaos. A sea of simple entities (I call them singularities) interacting through a sort of entanglement

What if antimatter falls upward?

I can see how you would think that but no

Curiosity/anti-curiosity Time/anti-time Empathy/anti-empathy Sympathy/anti-sympathy Empathy and anti-empathy = emotions (anger/sadness)

An AI that feels emotions isnt an AI. Its a person