rktpro

Why don't you take the first letters from the two words? Why last?

And rajakrsna, You combine the Gods of Bible and Hindu Scriptures. Is there any evidence in either of them which states that the God of the other text exist. Say, in Bible. is it there about Vishnu?

You haven't still made us to know where the bell is?

At some other place you mention of Hindu Scriptures. What evidence would you provide from them in support of you vision?

Science has seen its uprising from ancient Greeks. Though it might be debatable about whether Asian scientist and mathematics were the initiators of the great journey of knowledge yet we all agree that ancient Greek had a lot of reasonable contribution in the mainstream science and mathematics of today. Look at the case of the Newtonian era. They wrote in Latin just to make it look serious. It is a simply homage to the Greek.

These Greek letters are used by scientist as a convention or to make it look serious. How Jesus knew that later, thousands of years from then, people would use alpha and omega and theta and beta and all?

It wouldn't take enough time if you draw the ogive too. You will yourself understand your question.

I doubt that. A true mathematician is ready to help and take all crap.

IMHO, why was there a need to take that to 2000th prime. If you found that right,you must have aimed to find the reason behind-which no doubt is all about divisibility by 3. And a prime no. is just a no. which has 1 and itself as its factors. The fact is just that you have again defined what prime no. are. But if you added divisibilty test of 2 also, that would make it complete.

I read that in your nation parties along with the agreement of people, put their candidates for elections. In larger democracies like India, it is the top party leader who decides the contesting candidates. It seems that your nation is better in that aspect.

That is what I intend to say. Parties, in the name of democracy, still contest elections with manifesto and organise rallies but just to influence the opinion of people. They occupy legislative body, they have pressure groups as their extensions and personal opinion of many members doesn't count and a party runs by the opinion of party leader. Yes, I agree with you that the big-shots decide most of the policies/programs but I didn't put that point because I only understand the democratic politics of India. I thought it might be different in other countries. And that parties are no longer representative of people can be wrong in many nations. Parties are growing and identified with social and political division, I repeat. They represent people in form of representative government in large democracies. Parties have their 'vote banks' in the form of partisans. And if we think in detail, power sharing/ 3 tier system has enabled local people to have power. If, a political party doesn't pay heed to people, it is likely to get changed. That's why when there are more than 2 parties-we call it democracy-a fair choice for people.

@tomgwyther, Political parties which contest elections are now identical to social and political decisions. They sometimes put forward the opinions of people and sometimes they influence their decision-changing it the way they want. They mobilise people for a cause. True that people make law for themselves and parties execute that. But parties can and in many cases are just run on their own choice-which has been converted into wide opinion.

What problems you feel would be there in a democracy due to large population?

It should have been that species are able to reproduce. Yes, using the term 'mate' confines 'species' to only sexually reproducing.

Data must be in ascending order.

Hint:Sometimes a quartile is the average of two numbers which are in the quartile.

No doubt that democracy in not perfect, but it is ideal. And in every case, irrespective of population.

Did I say that existence was proved in class 10? Further, debating weather I was taught that is not the main topic here. All schools in different countries have different schooling and syllabus.

Not in a democracy and representative government along with coalition.

A robot could be categorised as specie only when it is able to mate and reproduce.

Still, who will decide that who will be in that board?

Aliens love circles. From the day they were told that crop circles were a prank by humans, they felt devastated. Now they have other shapes of UFO too.

Feynman Lectures on Physics is a must read before you die.

Unbiased things exist only in Probability and other assumed events like an unbiased coin. What you are proposing would never ever be democracy unless you make all people agree to your proposal, remove current political parties if the law in your country doesn't allow a change in main ideology. Oops, I assume, even if you get scientist on work, they will have to work what the people demand. You can't change their demands. And, it is not always quality/degree required in political life. Maybe your unbiased scientist might not connect to people. They might, though being unbiased, not able to see the regional demands. Further, let us say we apply your system. Now, how many parties would be there. More than 2 parties will make it a democracy. Let us suppose we have 5 parties. Since all members are unbiased, they all will have same manifesto and same ideology. They wouldn't compete for healthy politics. In politics, if you have more than one major party, it is clear indication that the other parrty has made certain people unhappy.

Okay. Now let us see it another way. Assume you have a black box/green box as proposed by OP fitted into a human. Now what it will store? Memories/experiences. It is not living, we all know. The box doesn't have life. It is biologically nothing but a just matter with no molecular/biological metabolism going on. Now we fit it into another human, say I fit that in you. Now, you already have a sense of life and you feel yourself. If you eat, you feel you have eaten. Even if the memories are transferred, deleting your all existing memories, it will not delete the part which makes you feel that whatever work is being done is done by you. Even in those who don't remember anything and have a complete memory wash still feel that what is being done is done by them. Hence, transferring memories in such a way would not mean that the person who has died will live again. What will live are his memories.