alpha2cen

The problem is the definition of the mass. mass1 ---------------------> mass2 + electromagnetic wave energy . mass1 energy = = mass2 energy + electromagnetic wave energy . This equation is correct. But mass1 = mass2 + electromagnetic wave energy ??? Are there anything I didn't think about?

Gravity is a force. Let's think about this case. When an object move from low gravity planet to very high gravity planet. It's mass is same on two planets. But their energy is very different. The object's energy of the high gravity planet is very high. How can we explain this phenomena with the energy conservation law?

We know proton is made of quarks. When we come up the temperature continuously the proton is divided into quarks. How high is the temperature?

Temperature dependent radiation follows the Planck radiation theory. High temperature electric wire emits very short wave length electromagnetic wave, whereas low temperature electric wire emits lower one. But molecular behavior is some different, short visible or UV waves are related to the electron behavior, external orbit electrons falling into inside orbit. IR waves are related to molecular motion, vibration, rotation, ... So UV or visible waves are very atomic dependent.

The wave length related parameter is contained in the term H2T, long wave length is more powerful than short wave length. When long wave is approaching to the shoreline the velocity is reduced and the wave height is increased. The limited water depth is wave length /2.

I mean our Earth grvity effect of the moon. If there were not the Moon near the Earth, how the Earth's gravity would be changed?

Then, how can we easily detect D.O. in the blood, any good instrument? And, are there any CO2 concentration analyzer in the blood without expelling it from our body?

If there were not the Moon, how our body weight would be changed? These are examples. * No effect. * Very small changed. * Very large changed---above 10%. If our body weight were changed, which percent would be correct? And, are there any theory about it?

The total amount of CO2 in the earth is no problem. The problem is the accumulated amount of CO2 in the air. So good solution is to reduce the CO2 emission. CO2 has been circulated in the Earth without problem from the beginning or the Earth. But resent culture requires much more energy per person. If we moved the CO2 to the Moon, we should emit much more CO2 than before. How can we make the rocket and other instruments for sending CO2 to the Moon without CO2 emission!

The Universe radiates much electromagnetic waves to all direction. So the mass should be decreased at every second. Can we calculate the total mass? And, how about the decrease rate per second?

Thank you for good answering. If so, the temperature for storaging the international standard mass is important, too.

Then, what is different from visible light emission and heat emission? They are all electromagnetic waves.

Till now we try to find Higgs Boson but we can not find it. I think, there may be something in the vacuum but we can not find it. How about this experiment? First we make long vacuum path for light travel. Next we vary light intensity and wave length(from radio wave to gamma ray). And then, we measure light intensity at the beginning point and the finish point. Vacuum path length has to be long. If there is any variation, we can consider vacuum as a medium.

According to the relativity theory the moving object mass should be changed. When we measure the mass at the 273 K and at the 0 K, the two measured mass may have very small difference. Because the electron movement at 0K is very slow. Is this right? If so, which one is the correct mass?

When we flow electrons through the copper wire, the magnetic field is generated. But I' m curiously about the condition which electromagnetic waves leave the copper wire. The wave is called radio wave. How the electromagnetic wave to leave the copper wire?

Why light speed in the vacuum is constant? It's not dependent on photon itself. If light traveled through the empty space, it would dependent on photon concentration - Fick's Law. When photon intensity is high, the light speed is fast, and when photon intensity is low, light speed is slow. The light speed constancy is related to vacuum medium constancy. Same case is the sound. The speed of the sound in the air is dependent on air density.

Let's think about these case. When two planets are approaching certain distance each other, and they have different electric charge and highly charged, what kind of thing would happen? From highly charged planet to lowly charged one electric discharge would be happen. Other case, some dense interstellar medium is highly charged cause of being exposed to the cosmic ray, if a planet or a comet is approaching them, I think, huge amount of electric discharge would happen.

When we give energy to the vacuum, we can make particles. Vacuum + energy --------------> matter + antimatter Similarly light traveling is that when we gave a small energy to the vacuum, +- fluctuated phenomena is occurring, isn't it? I do not say Ether. I'd like to say is the unknown property of the vacuum. Vacuum is general property of the Universe. Electron, proton, neutron, neutrino and photon are special property of the Universe. The things we most using are electron, proton and neutron combined particles. But the most particles comes from the vacuum.

Light is a transverse wave, so it need medium to move. For example, water wave needs water and air boundary face to move. So vacuum has that kind of property, doesn't it?

Nurological activity is required enegy consumption. That is many parts of our total energy consumption. During ATP--------->ADP reaction energy is emitted. The energy is used for maintaining nuronetwork system.

There were many discussions about traveling of the light through the vacuum before. It's important. How to travel the light in the vacuum? There is no medium to transfer the light wave.

The generated heat from copper wire region is very very small compare to nichrome wire region.

The problem is the other part of the line does not produce heat. Only a part of the nichrome wire produces heat energy. How does the flowing electrons interact with nichrome alloy molecules or near electrons?

So we can detect IR intensity by using the temperature difference between detector and the reference temperature. Is it right?

We think what we know about the Universe, i.e. present Universe knowledge, is not all right. It's the middle stage to go to the perfect trouth. The information for 13b lya away star ll be no useful about that star itself when we ll arrived there in the future . But it can help us to understand about ourself, our Solar system and the Universe itself.