Mellinia

Thanks! Light is a very complicated substance. What is a standing wave and what properties does it have?

Light is a electromagnetic wave? How do you control the direction of radio waves?

If rust is basically Fe3O4-nH20, would it possible to strip it of water with conc. sulphuric acid? Would the result be magnetite? Also, after the top procedure, if I use carbon to react with the product, would it yield iron?

So...basically it would work, in a partial vacuum and with absolute reflective materials. Can light direction be altered by means of magnetic forces?

Picture a sphere, the outer and inner shell are made of absolute reflective materials, with a fiber optic wire at one point on the sphere. It has a "stopcock" to stop the transmit of light into the sphere. If I send in light signals into the mirror-walled sphere through the wire, and close the stop cock after one minute, would: 1)The light signal continue reflecting in the sphere forever, provided that there is no outside influence, and the reflective material has absolute reflectivity, no light is absorbed? 2)The light signal be the same if I let it out through the fiber optic again? 3)I be able to store light?

ah, so magnetism is not linked to gravitation. What are paramagnetic and diamagnetic particles?

really? the experiments have been made?

strangely, both poles have the strongest gravitational force on land? Can someone do an experiment to see if there is a difference of G force at the geographical pole and the magnetic pole, take into account the altitude?

Because a strong enough magnet could induce a dia- or paramagnetic matter into a temporary magnet, right, just like gravity, in which a large mass, eg earth could attract you and me.

The Earth's magnetic field is close to the gravity field?..so...

It's all relative. ah well, thanks for the luck.

Well, naturally, that's why we have laws. The decision made by the murderer is based on previous data inputs, such as the victim was causing him immense lowering of pride or what so ever. In any case, my algorithm only apply to sane humans, psychos aside. Someone would kill because he thinks it's fun is categorised as "half sane and half insane" We must evaluate it from his viewpoint. Laws cause us to think twice before we do something bad because punishment will follow, along with lowering of pride, and the need to live will overcome this. Free will? Unless you can control everything that happens around you. That's free will of controlling data input.

It's the database. hmm..Thanks!

I don't think it's simply random. The rules only apply subconsciously, and different data input means different decision output. Besides, if it's random, there's no rules to apply! Oh, right. By the way, i wonder if i could predict what Osama Bin Laden will do next?

Our brain seem fully capable to do that. However, I don't think every thought and sensation is needed to process a decision. The "rules of algorithm" is workings in the subconscious mind. You couldn't the workings and algorithms of a computer game (Say, warcraft), could you? Initially, I'd actually wanted to show that humans are (possibly) logical, as they followed rules when they think. However, I do agree with you on the part of "every sensation and every thought that the subject had ever had" is needed...possibly to do a reverse proof, and "this machine might well tell you that it has more important things to do than predict another sapient machines decision. " I really have too much time on my hands, don't I?

I require an app that keeps a value, but when i give it an input, say "A" it will decrease the value and give response "B". Can c++ be used to do that?

Can I write a app that keeps a certain value until it receives an input that increase or decrease it?

okay...that's difficult...hmm...what are Natural languages anyway? okay...that's difficult...hmm...what are Natural computer languages anyway?

Yeah...is there any way to correct this? Possibly transform it into a logical processor? I tried programming myself...but i lack much technical knowledge...Maybe the "if" program might work....

Ok, I'll try to skim it down to the basic rules of the algorithm: 1. The human decision-making algorithm is based on an input-process-output basis. 2. Input includes present-time data from the nevironment and stored memories. Output is the decision. 3. The algorithm is divided into four parts, the first is primary, following second and third is auxillary, fourth is special. 4. First, survival. This is divided into Need to Live (Maintaining continuity) and Pride (Respect for the ability to live). They are further divided into "Self", "Other", and "Human". 5. Next, material. This part controls the value of each category. 6. The value of self pride is always in a equilibrium. When there is a heightening in self pride, Material will adjust to lower the pride with the same degree. Think of it as a straight line; when there is heightening (someone praises you) a wave is formed. After the peak, the wave will proceed downwards to return to its original line, and vice versa for lowering of pride. 7. Emotional is next. It directs Material to the required categories by singling out the ones that are needed to process a decision. 8. Last is Emotions. Emotions heighten or lower pride based on their categories: Positive (Anger, Joy, Proud), and Negative (Frustation, Grief, Regret). Positive heightens; Negtive lowers. 9. All values are determined in numbers. Loopholes...I'll try to cover them.

it can...provided that it has been provided with enough data..

I have a new theory on psychology...but it's proven evasive to prove....i mean, who would want to allow me to know every thought, every move, every word, and almost everything the 'someone' has gone through?

Humans typically brand themselves as illogical and so is their decisions, but I have a theory that could well explain our algorithms, and enable a breakthrough in the creation of human-like computer programmes. However, what I want to know is, can i post a theory paper without statistics, as my theory might prove near impossible to prove?