-Demosthenes-

Second are the hands. I do belveve in small evolution, just not goo to people. When humans could use their hands they could use the environment better. The once who were the smartest, that could use their hands the best) would live and reprodece until we were smarter as a race. But the same race. I think that only mammals with two arms that can manipulate the environment can have inteligence

Well, first the animals with the most ability to learn would be mamals, so I assume that only a mammal can have rational thought.

oh humans being the only inteligent form!

If there was nothing, which I just thought of, then maybe a higher power created the universe using thought. Now we can shape it using assumtions.

If the universe hasn't always existed, then what was here before it did?

okay, I'm sorry.

Well anyway, the Human beings before us on other planets could have formed the universe using there minds, before we reconfigured it to fit our way of thinking. PS I know what your thinking about other human beings, so I will explain how I think of it: If the universe has lasted forever and always existed, then there was intelingent life before we existed. The only logical form of inteligent life is the human being. If you really think about it it really is. I hope i don't have any spelling errors!

I was responding to the post before yours, thank you. Thanks though.

Of cource, all species are bound for destruction. To think otherwise would be ludicrous.

It was a joke. Besides how do we know that we don't look better than people did 500 years ago. If we did, it would be very small. Because it only happened in 500 years. People have evolved smaller jaws exclusively because people find it more attractive. That is a fact, not mumbo-jumbo!

If you sit in a confortable chair or wear shoes it and you never reproduce you had NO affect of the evolution of the species no matter how many confortable chairs you sit on or new shoes you wear, like suggested in the first post. What I think is that we are not evolving at all. Thanks to medical science mostly everyone lives. Maybe not all of them reproduce, but not much changes. The only possible evolution process that could happen would be: Only the most attractive people reproduce, so our species turns into a race of beautiful people! But thats about it.

My Creation Thoery: Evidents of evolution only exists because this planet was created using parts of other planets, which contained the animal remains that are similar to these ones. Which would create the illusion that animals had changed over time. Why are the animals on the other planets similar? Because they were all created too! Changing of a moths color through evolution has happened, but the change non-living goo to a one celled organism is completely implausible, much less the change to inteligent human beings.

Creation. Thoery: Evidents of evolution only exists because this planet was created using parts of other planets, which contained the animal remains that are similar to these ones. Which would create the illusion that animals had changed over time. Why are the animals on the other planets similar? Because they were all created too! Changing of a moths color through evolution has happened, but the change non-living goo to a one celled organism is completely implausible, much less the change to inteligent human beings.

Pockets of liquid contained in a thin film of a gas? Would that be possible if the gas has a lot of polarity so they stick togeter, and hold in the liquid?

Electrons seem to move faster than light. But thats impossible, so a solution could be worm-holes. Make sense?

I think that the electrons aren't going faster than light, they're going through worm-holes. It's impossible ot go faster than light unless you you an infinite amount of energy, which is impossible, or so Einstein said. It seems more reasonalbe that they travel through tiny worm-holes than using infinite amounts of energy to go faster than light.

Everything dies eventually.

In all honesty, you completely lost me.

To person who proved it wrong it makes even more sense that it not be true, so it's not true.

The child holds his parant's words to be absolute truth. If the parant says that one day they will die, and they know might know about relatives such as Great Grandpa died(EX), then they will accepted it as reality. But the Scientist who really knows nothing for certain about his scientific project can to conjure idea that makes sense and it can become true. He dosn't know if it can be true or not, but it makes sense, so it can become true.

I think I read that some reptiles are born mature, and only grow larger. The never age, or mature normal. The only change they go through life is that they get bigger.

Your thinking only shapes the universe if you "know" it's true. So the people who only "thought" they know couldn't "know" so thats not how the universe exists. The smart people who "know" that what they "know" has to be true to explain the it in a way that they can understand. The idea that "thinking" can make someting happen for no reason it inplausable, but if you "know" it's the only way to explain the universe in a way that wouldn't destroy their whole world. Like when a child first find out that they will die someday. It completely destroys and reorients how they live their life. It's a cool idea that someone could change the universe to avoid another experience like that.

Why not? Is there anyway to prove it, or disprove it? It just seems what people think of, that is logical, turns out to be true. The most logical is usually the most simple one, so maybe we only proved the validity of Razor's law: the simplest solution is usually the correct one.

I think reptiles only grow larger as they age, they don't get older like mamals. Thats way some turtles can live for hundreds of years. Why can't people be that way?

Maybe you could explain it to me and it's relation to time travel?