-Demosthenes-

Weren't the first life-forms ones that used carbon dioxide in an atnosphere of mainly carbon dioxide? They eventually used it all up "polluting" all there air with oxygen. Hmmm, maybe it's not ever really "pollution" at all, just a change in ratio of gases... weird thought.

Wait... If you don't consider a fetus a person there is no abuse at all. How can destorying a fetus be not as bad as damaging one?

Circles are cool.

Wouldn't abnormal gravity ultimatly kill you, or can your body completely adapt?

http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3361 Yeah, we've done it before. Economic Left/Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.03 http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/printablegraph.php?ec=0.38&soc=-1.03 Edit: Hey, you can vote on moses! http://www.jpagel.f2s.com/politicalcompass/historical/historicon.php Another Edit: When I first did it I thought it was weird how I was closer to Kerry than Bush.

That's what messed me up

Heck, I accedentally posted twice.

How is it bigoted to think that a behavior (something someone controls) is morally wrong in their opinion?

Tea isn't cool anymore. Meh, what are gona do...

And people who don't have the money for a fine?

What are the criteria?

This is from a "shark quiz" on msn. It starts with this: A shark attack is obviously more likely if you are in the water. It says 30 people got attacked so it's 1 in 10 million in the US who has gotten attacked. But for people out of the water and not near the ocean it would be about zero and if you are in the water it would be much greater (30 in however many are in the ocean in the year).. If you average them then you get 1 in 10 million, is that a far number?

This is not very conslusive evidence but it's evidence all the same. Me and my little brother closest to me in age grew up with flouridation. I've gotten two cavity in my life and my brother one. Later my even younger brother was born and we moved to where there was no flouridation. He has had many cavities (and continues to have them). This may or may not be related to flouridation. It may be something else or it may be a fluke (he is more suseptible to cavities somehow else).

Poodle

If you mean me, I definely do not want a fight.

Oh well.

I just saw it (I'm a little late ). If the earth's microbes killed them, then do they not have microbes on their planet? Or were ours different from ours and they had no immunities against them, and if so wouldn't they bring their own microbes that we would not be immune to (like small pox when the spanish arived in the Americas)? Second, if they had been planning if for millions of years why wouldn't they think of the microbes? They burried the tripods and everything and it didn't occur to them that the earth's germs could hurt them? Third, why would they have to send down their own people to pilate the tripods anyway? If they have such good technology why can't they just have them on some kind of "remote control"?

Wow, I don't know much about dreams or lucid dreaming, but my dreams are always hazy and I forget them within minutes of waking. Wierd

It was a good argument, but then you moved into attacking people who believe in God. We can educate or even argue with each other, but it's not just "creationalists" that are attacking people.

http://scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=12294 http://scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=12163 __________ Based on what? Pulled this from a thread from a long time ago. There, now you know some of the evidence.

Can't you understand where I'm coming from though? It was mosly Ardvark's posts that provoked me. There is no difference' date=' therefore no distinction can be made.[/quote']

So there are poeple that beleive in God, but not the idea that God created the earth and life? Well, as long as where talking "majorities" I think it would be nice to point out that I'm pretty sure the "majority" of people who blelieve in God believe He created the earth and Life.

Well how nice of you to assume that the majority of people that believe in God are idiots.

No, but it's the creationalist point of view of evolutionists, much like your post is the evolutionist view of creationist. Do you really think that the majority of creationalists do all these things? Sure the majority on this site, but that isn't a very good representation of creationalists. Only the ones who want to proove us all wrong post here.

Oh please this: Is exactly like saying this: See how rediculous it is? How does it feel?