JustStuit

Your teachers are plotting against you and your sanity. I suggest the obvious action of studing or lack thereof

So if we were to create a decive that mimics the phyical processes of the brain exactly, it would have a conciousness?

Possibly a baby? Just kidding. It would also have to have sensors and recievers and the lot but I wonder if even then it would develope into a concious entity.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=000EA775-7465-13CD-B46583414B7F0000

I've made a resolution to laugh more. It puts us in a better mood and apparently is good for us too. I've also adopted the motto "Ignorance is Bliss" to help with depressing situations.

I bet for some money she might

Do you know how much money it costs to keep a high risk criminal in maximum security jail? How could we afford to hold all the people who have a life sentance in jail. It would take guards, food, survelince, building, electricity, water, safety precautions, etc. I bet it costs a lot, although I'm not sure how much. I am against using the death penalty but it would sure cost a lot of money. If only it were cheaper or something. Also the threat of escaping could be another con. Too bad people can't just be nice.

okay but if u give a toy boat a push it reaches T.Velocity then slows down due to friction in space there is no friction so y would it simply reach terminal velocity since there is nothing dtopping it from going faster?

Because it needs a force to go faster - it just won't slow down because there is no force in the opposite direction.

No - this is a misinterpritation of newtons first law. They will remain in motion. They will not accelerate - this involves a force needed. They will remain in motion but not accelerated motion. Newton's second law says that acceleration is directly related to force and inversely related to mass, thus a force is needed.

I think you may be in the wrong type of forums. Btw, they uses bugs or loopholes in the code to do this or ways around what is allowed. There is no science in this unless they hack and you consider hacking science which I wouldn't.

Light speed is slower in the atomsphere with the presence of air atoms/molecules, but the speed of light is based off of the speed in a vacuum. In space light travels the speed of light but in air it is slowed from hitting molecuels and travels a *little* slower.

There is a lot to be said for distillation.

 

As far as energy from the vacuum' date=' I can assure you that zero point is a reality. Note patent #6,362,718. A friend of mine holds this patent, along with Jean Louis Naudin, Stephen L Patrick, James C. Hayes, and Kenneth D Moore. He sent me his book some time ago. We are trying to get this book into schools as a text because it disproves some old and faulty "principles" of science.

 

What we encounter in putting new technologies into use is politics. I'm sure you're aware of the politics involved in fossil fuel use.

 

It's not like the C.O.P. in overunity devices is the FIRST or even the MAJOR try to override the politics of oil. It IS, however, one of the suppressed technologies due to politics.

 

No one has said that the production of hydrogen fuel is FREE. However, it's by-product is quite safe. Its by-product could eliminate the need for desalination altogether.

 

zeropoint[/quote']

Which principles of science are you talking about? And what is this patent about and does it have proof behind it - people can patent something and it still may not work or have any value.

"Yea it would be better if we didn't. It would be better if any country didn't. You concentrate only on the US as a scapegoat because so far you have claimed no responsibility."

 

I have i live in the uk we produce 2% of the pollution stop trying to say im just picking on the usa' date=' im not im just saying things would be better if they would pitch in and do their bit to heal what we all have damaged!!

 

As for the source of the stats go to sky news sites or bbc news 24 site and type in climate change or polar caps it should come up!

 

If the above reveals nothing of any interest then go to any search engine and type global pollution statistics!![/quote']

Things would be better if any country did more to prevent it. So far you have been only picking on the US.

Could you post a link? I couldn't seem to find anything.

But it wouldnt be to bad if your country would sign the treaty to cut carbon emissions! but it wont and thx severian i was gonna point out france also britain produces 2% of the pollution because we use wind turbines' date=' and tidal power along with others such as solar power so america has no excuses there are other power sources but they refuse them all for oil!!

 

Im not making it up check the news sites for the pollution statistics!!! Juststuit!![/quote']

Yea it would be better if we didn't. It would be better if any country didn't. You concentrate only on the US as a scapegoat because so far you have claimed no responsibility. I would also like a reputable link to your source because, while I may not doubt it, I think it would be interesting to read up on it.

hmmm....spacetime

I think nearly every country uses and needs oil except maybe some of the poorer third world countires. Take this away and all would be affected.

lol nice reference. It is a nice idea to minimize error by calculating a smaller interval.

You cant argue with Statistics' date=' "America Is addicted to oil" Your president's very words and the biggest irony is hes one of the biggest oil barons out of Texas!! lol

 

America produces 40% pollution u cant argue with that No scapegoat needed u buried yourself!![/quote']

Blame who you must. I'm sure fingerpointing is very productive. Show me a country not addicted to oil and I'll show you a dead one.

Oh I see. Estimate a smaller interval to achieve a more accurate result (however accurate it may be.)

The infamous scapegoat.

I find it weird that we would pass on a bunch of meaningless DNA but I guess it could be possible. Seems depressing that only 1% of our code is important if true.

Well today is answer day' date=' and so far all I received was that pendulum. But anyway, here I go.

 

I decided to use the paper clip and connect a fiber, or length of string to the base of the light fixture, on the string, I thought that you can place a slip knot with a slight portrusion, on that extra portruding fiber, tie some coins as weights and the slip knot will slide ever so slowly. [b']Now you can mark the amount the slip knot has slid for one minute[/b] and from there use the measurement to time any other length of time.

 

Its a rough sketch, but then again, I did say my answer would be the worst.

This would involve being able to measure one minute on the machine which would involve something which tells time. Not to poke holes.

It may be easier to grip and write

cubic metre per kilogram (m3 kg-1)

not too sure though, that's specific volume i think...don't remember the difference..actually I don't think I ever learned.

http://www.gordonengland.co.uk/conversion/siderived2.htm

not sure if this will help

Stop stealing our cold