wormholeman

Thank you for your replys guys. I read all what you all wrote, and I recieved a lot of insight on my matter. When I read it all. I found that it was helpfull, helpfull in ways such as a persons health reflects their attitude, thinking ect..ect. Gererally I thought that. It seems that sometimes I have to tolerate my matter which isn't heard for me, but I respect all your comments about it. Thankyou marlon

I feel as though I should post this. I have noticed that a lot of people use more of thier intellect rather than explaining in simple terms (I am also guilty of that, but I do keep it in mind). The reason I say this is because not everybody has the same education to a certain degree, everybodys education is different, I know there are people that know this and I can undertand why it can be a bit annoying that im saying this. But! The way I see it is, if there's a problem solve it, try not to just let it slide. I have great respect for Einstien who once said, "Everything should be made simple but not simpler". I understand this as, If I understand you and your able to succeed in what you want me to understand then I will know what your talking about. and simpler as in "None sence". I hope this can help someone. Marlon

(Ryanj), the target problem would probobley have been for blurryness. I think I know theres lazer techniques that do correct vision. (insane_alien), ya that dose make sence about the muscle thing about the rods and cones, I thought that because they open and close that they would be like muscles of some sort. Thanks:-)

Last night as I was falling asleep I thought about how vision could be corrected if someone had bad vision. For some reason I thought that red and green light exposed to an eye while being flashed at cirtain intervals depending on the eye's problem can correct vision. Could that work? The reason I think it would work is because flashing red and green light at a damaged eye would excersize the rods and cones in the eye causeing them to work properly. Dose that make sence. Thanks

Thankyou. Next time, when I have something simular to convea, I will express my self in such a way which will not offend people, I will be more apropriete. I apologize

well I guess Im stupid then

This is the biggest pile of *$#@ I have ever heard. It's a proven fact the the more you know about a person the more a so called empath is able to determine about the subject...NO MAGIC HERE! HOI!

My nationality is Canadian. A lot of what I know about Einstein is from tv, and lately in the past it has been from the internet. My opinon on him is vague cause I only know of him through the media and books.(edit-) I find his work fasinating because it's so out there. If he was alive today I would definetly want to meet him.

oops double post

The speed of time can be measured simply by knowing that for each second there is 60 miliseconds and for each minute there is 60 seconds and for each hour it is 60 minutes..In other words, for the time it takes for a minute it takes 60 seconds..So by measuring how fast a minute takes and the speed at which the ticks (revolutions) travel..Example: If you are traveling to a place where it is 10 kilometres and if it takes 1 hour to get there, you can say your traveling at the speed of 10 (k)ilometres (p)er (h)our <--see the kph.. So intern to measure the speed of time, you must know the distance..Then you multiply the distance and the time it takes for the answer. Hmm... So mabey the answer is (I)nfinity-distance (p)er (h)our Which I think it is.

Actually I'm changing my thoughts on this, Eon_rider is riding the right line. "Time is no fantasy"-Eon_rider

I agree, but time has a lot to do with math and momentum too.

I see, negative mass he is interpreting as (nothing), what he is thinking is of as is a mass which is completeley opposite to what solid mass is. Simple!

I read all the responses from the 1st post to the last. Seems ya'll are talkin about teleportation. Turning matter to a wave then to matter again in a different position in space..is a hard concept to grasp. Imagining if an object is placed on a surface and the molecular construction of the object is somehow vaccumed into a collector where the molecules are converted to electrons and then converting the electrons to molecules again by..I don't know..Mabey..Reassembly by means of nano technology. Dose that make any sence?

Ya, I saw that too. I diden't know about that till I looked at it. I suppose I do have a more understanding of the video.

I think im confused about all of this now, oh well it was fun...

omit this too..sheesh

Actully ya..you have a point ..So the star/sun infront of the observer you see is actually behind the observer (Angular compression).

omit this

Ya I did say I understood, but not all of it. After viewing the movie I listened more to what the guy was saying, he mentioned Relativistic aberation. (as per why the rings bulge) This info is from your link you provided: http://www.anu.edu.au/Physics/Savage/TEE/site/tee/learning/aberration/aberration.html "Relativistic Aberration The shape, position or orientation of an object seen by a person moving near the speed of light can be quite unusual, and even different to what is predicted by the non-optical aspects of Einstein's theory of special relativity, such as length contraction. This is due to the purely visual effects of angular compression and distortion." The light theory I dont except. Because the observer is traveling at 99% light speed and the star/sun is in front not behind. Why the planet gets smaller when the observer approaces it while acellerates forward and dose the opposite the other way, boggles me. But like you and the guy said it was because of the effect of angular compression. "Angular compression As we travel faster, light appears to come at us from different angles. To understand why this occurs, imagine driving in a car on a rainy day. Although to a person standing on the road the rain falls straight down to the ground, from inside the car it looks as though the rain is falling towards us at an angle. In a similar way, as we travel close to the speed of light, the angles of light coming towards us from all sides appear to contract, such that more light approaches us from in front:"

Man! This stuff is hard to understand.. I think its way out of my league.

I understand your answers, and it sounds right. Thanks! 4) Why do the rings flip inside out as we pass between them and the plannet? 5) And why bend over us? For both those questions, I really think its because of the angular compression. [edit] (because traveling near speed of light when we pass between the rings and the planet)

Ya. those previous posts I put about gravity and light are not correct. Please tell me of your answers, im curious.

Or might it be the outward gravity from the star?