Jump to content


Senior Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Neutral

About cambrian_exp

  • Rank
  1. they may be intelligent , but they were not able to use it, just like dolphins who have no arms to hold things. we got intelligence plus free arms to make our imaginations a reality:rolleyes:
  2. we have been digging up fossils and creating museums for past few hundred years, but suppose after 100 million years some civilization took birth and began to dig fossils,then they would find human fossils with dinosaurs and other ancient reptiles. maybe entire history of earth will be messed up for them.
  3. sweet child o mine-- guns n roses november rain --- guns n roses green eyes --- dark moor these songs rock
  4. it was chrismas and little boy meet santa and he wanted gift, boy: santa santa, i want brother. santa: oh boy, oh boy bring your mother.
  5. these creationist people waste their resources in stuff full of nonsense and shit
  6. http://www.msstate.edu/org/sacs/evsim.html this is page i stumbled upon.looks like creationist site, pls see that. also see this http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/
  7. heres a geological timeline i have created in photoshop. given a aged look just check it out at this link http://www.geocities.com/time_never_stops/geotime.jpg
  8. whenever i look at house lizard i think of second coming of dinosaurs , well but is it scientifically possible? because there is not much difference between common lizard and first reptiles which gave rise to dinosaurs. and yea we may not develop technology to prevent objects from impacting earth because we will soon or later end up ourselves. most of advanced civilizations end up themselves i think so. because as civilization advances many new different ideologies emrge within it self which is cause of war . so we may soon end up and when mass extinction occurs we may not be able to protect our self and new dinosaurs may rise again . it is possible that invertebrates like octupus eventually colonize land and produce some intelligent species ( as shown in future is wild ) because octupus have tencticules which can be used for handling tools!
  9. but generally most mass extinction have been occuring at rate of 1 per 100 million years and small extinctions at rate of 1 per 30 million years i think
  10. humans will leave the earth or become extinct within 50 million years from now. current rates suggests that major mass extinction does really occurs every 100 million years. last one occured 65 million years ago so next may occur within 35 million years from now. just imagine only creatures less than 15 kg survive i.e very small lizards and insects and some mammals too and evolutionary arms race begins during post extinction period . so these small house lizards can again become large permian type reptiles like archeosaurs and dinosaurs like creature again come into existance like history repeats itself type phenomena? what do you think?
  11. well i found this from http://www.drdino.com From magazines to newspapers...from museums to textbooks...the concept that dinosaurs turned into birds is presented as a fact. Yet this concept, like all of the other supposed "facts" of evolution, is wrought with problems which are seldom exposed. Whenever dinosaurs with a bone structure remotely similar to birds are found, the link between dinosaurs and birds is assumed to exist. Bird fossils such as Archaeopteryx (right) are presented as proof of evolution because the bones have some characteristics reminiscent of reptiles. Yet this whole idea of dinosaurs turning into birds is based more on faith than scientific fact. Here are a few observations which are seldom reported: Many recent dinosaur to bird "links" are "dated" between 120-140 million years. Yet archaeopteryx (which exhibits all the characteristics of a fully formed bird) is "dated" at 150 million years. Alan Feduccia, a world authority on birds (and evolutionist) states, "Paleontologist have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur. But it's not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that." Birds have a totally different respiratory system than reptiles. For a reptilian respiratory system to change into an avian respiratory system would be analogous to a steam engine changing into an electric motor by randomly removing or modifying one component at a time, without disrupting the motor operation. It is simply an impossibility. The hollow bones, muscle design, keen eyesight, neurological commands, instincts, feathers, and a hundred other unique bird features are completely different from reptiles. In particular a bird's lungs and feathers display brilliant design. Either would be totally useless to perform their designed function unless complete. A step by step transformation from scale to feather makes a nice story but "the devil is in the details". And the details simply do not add up to a workable intermediate creature. The building blocks of scales and feathers aren't even the same-they are made from different types of protein! University of Kansas paleontologist Larry Martin sums up the presentation of this dinosaur to bird fossils best: "You have to put this into perspective. To the people who wrote this paper, (linking dinosaurs to birds) the chicken would be a feathered dinosaur." Those who reject the possibility of the sudden appearance of birds have no other alternative than to accept the inadequate evidence for evolution. However, the actual evidence for evolution does not support that this ever happened. Evolution is the only alternative (creation by God) has been arbitrarily eliminated. Rather than blindly accepting the latest evolutionary find, dig into the details and determine if real science proves that reptiles could have turned into birds or lifeless chemicals could have ever "come alive". An honest scientist will follow the data wherever it leads-even if it leads to an encounter with a personal creator. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ i really have problem with 1st point! how can ancestoral theropods evovle after birds?
  12. well i debated one creationist for few minutes and he said that dino fossils with humans have been found and he has seen that in pic. he said scientists are conspiring against ID and creationism by not showing those fossils because majority of scientists have no morality
  13. Yea i call These creationist as Fanatics or Terrorists, they terrorise science with their horrific theoris lol
  14. huh? u didnt understant 2nd post? whay i meant to say is that i m commerce graduate and still we had evolution in our syllabus
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.