Dhillon1724X

you cant downvote someone just for stating facts. You deserve Congratulations.

Sure sir, I went to school thats why i was unable to answer. U havent read the paper?

“stationary” here means non-propagating in the traditional particle sense, unlike gravitons in linear quantum gravity. Instead, Chortons form a network of curvature nodes. Gravity arises not by exchange particles flying between masses, but by the motion of objects through this curved Chorton field. This is analogous to General Relativity: mass moves along geodesics defined by local curvature — not via direct force transmission. I will work on it. I will find it out myself. Thanks for telling I am waiting for them.

Thank you for the thoughtful question. Yes, within the Quantum Chorton Framework, space is not a passive stage but an active, emergent curvature field woven from the presence and dynamics of Chortons. These Chortons, born from ultra-high-energy photon collapse, act as persistent quantum curvature nodes — they don't merely transmit gravity but generate the geometry of spacetime itself. So in that sense: Space is a gravitational field — not in the classical Newtonian sense, but as a distributed energy-encoded structure built from quantized curvature (like the χμν\chi_{\mu\nu}χμν field). Therefore, a significant portion of the initial energy released at the Big Bang does become embedded in the formation of space itself. I am not waving hands in air,i have do Its very deep question,its my nature to think everything deeply so i will think deeply first. i have to do some proper calculations and predictions to say anything. Thanks for questioning, i welcome any further questions,feedback and critiques. If by recoverable you mean utilizing it then its very advanced topic,but i love this type of advanced topics,If i didnt then i might be still studying refraction of light in school.

Abstract We propose the Quantum Chorton Framework (QCF), a novel model of quantum gravity in which spacetime and curvature emerge from a threshold-triggered quantum transition of high-energy photon fields. When the local energy density exceeds the Planck scale, the photon field undergoes a non-perturbative phase transition that produces discrete, stationary, spin-2 excitations called Chortons. These excitations form a quantized curvature field that defines the underlying geometry of spacetime. In contrast to traditional graviton-based theories, QCF does not treat gravity as a force mediated by propagating particles, but as the collective geometric structure arising from the distribution of Chortons. The model is background-free, gauge-invariant, and consistent with the Weinberg–Witten theorem. It predicts curvature redshift and gravitational behavior as emergent consequences of Chorton dynamics, and provides a physically motivated mechanism for the origin of spacetime without assuming a pre-existing metric. We present the theoretical formulation of the framework, derive the conditions for Chorton formation, and show how classical gravity and cosmic expansion are recovered at macroscopic scales. These results support a reinterpretation of gravitation as a quantum geometric phenomenon seeded by energy concentration in the early universe. Introduction The unification of quantum mechanics and General Relativity remains one of the most profound challenges in theoretical physics. While General Relativity describes spacetime as a smooth, dynamic geometry shaped by energy and momentum, quantum field theory treats all fundamental interactions as discrete processes governed by probabilistic laws. Reconciling these perspectives requires a framework in which geometry itself emerges from quantum principles. The Quantum Chorton Framework (QCF) proposes that spacetime and gravity originate from the collapse of high-energy photon fields into discrete, spin-2 curvature quanta called Chortons. In this model, when the local energy density of photons exceeds the Planck threshold within a critical volume, a quantum phase transition occurs that produces stationary Chortons. These excitations form a nonpropagating curvature lattice, defining the geometric structure of spacetime at the smallest scales. Each Chorton carries a quantized packet of curvature, with energy, wavelength, and equivalent mass determined by fundamental constants. Their collective distribution gives rise to the gravitational field—not as a force mediated by propagating particles, but as an emergent structure built from energy-induced geometry. The framework further predicts that Chortons exhibit wave-particle duality, allowing curvature to manifest as both localized nodes and coherent gravitational waves in the classical limit. Unlike traditional graviton-based theories, QCF does not assume a preexisting spacetime background. It satisfies key consistency criteria, including gauge symmetry and the Weinberg–Witten theorem, and provides a mechanism for redshift and cosmic expansion as geometric consequences of Chorton dilution. In this picture, the graviton is not a fundamental particle but a large-scale, coarse-grained behavior of the Chorton network. This paper presents the formulation of the Quantum Chorton Framework, derives its dynamical equations, and demonstrates its compatibility with both classical General Relativity and quantum field principles. The model offers a new path toward understanding gravity as a manifestation of quantum geometry, rooted in the physical behavior of energy at the Planck scale. I posted if anyone need source,I have posted things for discussion here My paper is a framework,and its maths heavy if it cant be discussed here then where? I am here to get critiques and improve my work. To learn from others. @swansont If i post it part by part then its worth nothing. So is it limitation of SFN?.If yes then i have to figure something out as this paper is going to get more longer.

@swansont So i cant post link in post topic but i can do that in replies? I have to do it as its 80 pages in total,i cant share file directly because of some reasons. If anyone wants to read full paper then they can see it on https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16198064

Sir its 70+ pages,i have explained major things here,I cant write all pages here. and i am not making thread to post a link.Please kindly place that link back or tell me a alternative

I wanted to show this before i turn 15.If this is worth refining then please give me advice,maybe i can go to a journal , But first i need endorsement on Arxiv,so i can show it to others too. Special thanks to @studiot @joigus and other seniors who encouraged me,critiqued my work and taught me.

I think this person doesnt know that its not Quora or maybe its leg pulling.

I see,you did alot of Hardwork. Should i say congratulations? +1 Yes,you are right.

This theory is now Forged into Quantum Chorton Framework(QCF).

My previous work was forged into this,the Graviton failed and Chorton emerged. Gravitons cant exist. They are not supposed to exist or need to exist.

Hello, I’m Kulraj Singh Dhillon, an independent theoretical researcher from India. Over the past two months, I’ve been developing a new model of quantum gravity called the Quantum Chorton Framework (QCF) — built from the ground up using principles of energy thresholds, curvature quantization, and emergent geometry. In this framework, spacetime does not pre-exist — instead, it emerges dynamically from discrete curvature quanta called Chortons, which are spin-2 excitations generated when photon energy density exceeds the Planck threshold. These Chortons are stationary and act as fundamental “building blocks” of geometry. The theory includes: - A full Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulation of the curvature field, - Path integral quantization and gauge structure, - Constraint dynamics and symmetry analysis, - A classical limit that recovers General Relativity from a coarse-grained Chorton ensemble. Some key predictions: - **GHz-scale gravitational signatures, potentially detectable with future quantum sensors, - **Black hole formation from radiation alone , - **Redefined Hawking radiation as a dissipation of the curvature field, - Subtle CMB and redshift deviations from discrete geometric emergence. I've just published the full paper (it's quite detailed and long) here: link removed The paper also includes a comparison with major frameworks like Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and String Theory. I welcome any questions, comments, or constructive critique. This is a first public release, and I’d love to hear where it stands scientifically and what could be improved. Thanks for reading, Kulraj Singh Dhillon If you find this work interesting or worth exploring further, I would sincerely appreciate any help in getting endorsed for arXiv submission. I'm aiming to submit it under the [gr-qc] or [hep-th] categories, and currently need an endorsement to proceed. Thank you again for taking the time to read and consider my work.

Good News! I have published Quantum Chorton Framework on Zenodo. Soon i will make a post I will suggest to discuss further on new post,i am open to any refinement and critiques. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16198064 (is it okay to paste the DOI)

Who have stoped you? The science develops with help of critiques. If a theory doesnt get a critique then it means it’s too perfect or something anyone will not even talk about. Your’s isn’t first case.

Then I will add diagrams,probably after it survives critiques.

By visuals i mean a imaginative image of unseen. I was asking if i need them,i dont like adding imagination like that.

I had a question? Should i add visuals too,as per my view they are not that important. I am going to add graphs anyways,so should i include visuals.

Ok sir. As i said once that now i know why i am bad at maths,i studied in my own way and now i am improving. Now i understand what @joigus meant when he said "You don't have to be a mathematical genius, just understand it and know how to use it". Thanks for your support.

@studiot The Curve sketching is helping me,I am starting to learn it as i need it in my new framework. I have completed 70+ pages paper,it will be ready in few more days.

I will be happy to share.

This science forum covers small things to big innovations,thats impressive.

According to my research it can be due to translation too,and chinese papers have philosophical style sometimes. But you still have to prove it.

Sir I am using resources which you told like geomaths etc.I looked at everything you told me.Soon I will give feedback.

sorry for that. Ok sir.