pinball1970

Seconded.

No it's just a wall of text again. There is no other side to "the story" The Theory of Evolution is one of the most tested and verified scientific theories. You need to get a basic high school book out on this rather than pasting co pilot/Got chat walls of text.

What model? You haven't posted anything I can look at. I asked you for Another poster has looked at some details and had pointed out difficulties already, basic ones.

Post part of it or I am done. I don't like time wasters

You have not actually posted anything in two days. Rather than telling us what your TOE can do why don't you put down, specially what it is or part of it? Just ONE part that current physics does not explain.

Before you do that and since it's now been two days since you posted, can you outline your reconciliation of GR and QM? That should be your big hitter in your TOE.

No, the current thinking in Cosmology is the opposite. The universe is most likely infinite.

But well? Do you have a big hitter? What is the stand out point? Your flag ship?

Well that destroys my ex gf thesis of everything revolving around me. If the universe is infinite and there seems to be reasonable data/theory that it could be, then there could not be a centre.

Just a thought, being reasonable, co-operative can form part of ESS, Evolutionary Stable Strategy, being a sucker or a complete selfish meanie does not work out that well. I will refer you to John Maynard Smith and his work.

I do not open links or read long essays. Can you not outline one of your showstoppers?

Catching a cold from getting wet. Flu was a bad cold. People could die of "old age" The universe was once smaller than an atom then expanded.

The scientific community disagree with you.

Can you answer my questions? Or are posting in bad faith with zero intent on actually answering anything?

Sorry, how did that happen? I quoted ID guy What is "opposite?" It wasn't your post, it was a wall of AI. If this is new and cutting edge why are you posting citations from 2003, 2010, 2015? Which is what? Second time. Evolution has purpose? Is designed? Spell it out you are not being clear. Why is "Science is finding stuff out" such a suprise to you? It is called LEARNING.

As it has always been. What is "opposite?"

The question Christianity and it's compatibility with Science

YOU are an animal as am I, not according to Darwin or an atheist, this according to the great scientist and creationist, Carl Linnaeus. As is atomic theory, Quantum theory and all the other science theories. What do you think a scientific theory is?

We are all animals here, nothing to be ashamed about.

Anyway back on track. My morality came from. Mother. Upbringing, environment. 1966-present. School. Teachers, friends 1971-83 Priests, nuns, heavily connected to my school. Parishioners. 1970-1981 College, monks. 1983-85 University 1986- present, students I am still friends with. I realised I was an atheist after all of that, 1990. I am still learning. Hey, I'm bearing my godless soul here! Oxbridge showers are out of bounds but I would go down a storm at Loughborough. Actually not there either for other reasons. Anyway back to the OP, I doubt many people would have a totally different story than mine regarding moral learning if they are Gen x UK.

Yes, I thought that was Kant but a quick Google says Nietzsche. Zeig Heil? I thought that was reserved for the Furher? Gaps in my knowledge include philosophy/philosophers, Greek mythology, poetry and English literature including Shakespeare. Basically I am ashamed to shower with other Englishmen.

I read his bio. Do I need him? For this discussion? I have read Hitchens, he is more contemporary. Anyway I can certainly state my case as an atheist without Nietzsche, he is not part of my story.

No idea, I have never read him.

What do you mean by this? There is an outside agency? What? In your own words please, a wall of AI is not helpful. We have known about developmental biology and epigenetics for some time

I thought this would come under the UKHSA but they seem be all on the micro side. The DWI do the sort of testing/collate the sort of testing we are talking about. The link below has the reports. Scroll down to "Drinking water 2023-Summary of the chief inspectors report for drinking water in England." Page 14 has a pie chart of the things tested for. Heavy metals, trihalomethanes, propy zamide (pesticide -i don't know this one) Radon and harmful pathogens. https://www.dwi.gov.uk/what-we-do/annual-report/drinking-water-2023/ From the site. "The Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) was formed in 1990 to provide independent reassurance that public water supplies in England and Wales are safe and drinking water quality is acceptable to consumers. We are a small organisation of 55 staff."