Alysdexic

"Neocon" is a US philosophy; American force to spread democracy and protect national interests; pretends to morals, challenges global governanty (if hard left is big government and hard riht is morals, then hard centre must be society). "Fascism" is a farriht political wave from 20th century Europe; defined by dictatorial power, accuses, shuts up, crushes opposition, dictates over society and economy. "Altriht" is a loose farriht, white nationalist group, starting around 2014 and the 2016 US election; distanced from mainstream conservatism; racist; white supremacist. "Neocon fascism altriht" defines an authoritarian, warlike, ethnonationalist trend in rihtist politics. Common characteristics: authoritarianism, social dominanty orientation, outgroup bias; often, conspiratorial thinking (fabrication, misrepresentation, misreading, projection, paranoia, pareidolia, reification), cognitive inflexibility (and dissonanty), moral absolutism. These characteristics are rooted in inflexible social hierarchies, a bias against social "others," a cognitive style that resists change, preferring uncomplicated, binary explanations. Conspiratorial thinking may be a mekanism to simplify complex social realities by attributing events to powerful, usually malicious forces. Moral absolutism often pairs with this cognitive style, fostering an us-against-them mentality. One must be cautious of psýkologhists, who steal words from other languages, twisting and perverting them to fit preconceptions or societal "norms." Also, what makes modern psýkologhy a fraud is that delusional disorder, folie à deux, mass hysteria depend on the population fraction who disagree with a belief; therefore whether the APA classify a condition a disorder depends on social climate, much of whom include conservative prudes, breeders, and cretins who are slow to learn scienty and evidence-based ideas. Politics is in the brain, like everything else. In liberals, the anterior cingulate cortex is greater; in conservatives, the amygdala is greater. The latter is more primitive. These are not mere tendencies, but ingrained cognitive structures that shape political beliefs.

America needs fewer, better jobs and fewer, better Americans.

1/2, 2/3, 11/15, 163/210, 619/770, 29/35, …? It’s the sum of reciprocal primes minus multiples’ overlaps plus subtracted multiples’ overlaps toward unity.

So why don't you answer them instead of replying to me? OP: 10cm x 10cm 15cm x 15cm (1.5 times larger) f = r^2 / 4s f = focal length r = radius of the mirror / 10cm (half the mirror's diameter) s = enlargement ratio / 1.5 (50% enlargement) f = (10cm)^2 / 4(1.5), etc.

Civility and polity are a problem, grounded on liges and brainwash. Calling people what they are is not "un"civil. Censorship, obscurantism, and prejudice are the greatest ills ever foisted on this world; they spawn all other ills; they make liars and fools with power punish the undeserving without power. Every thing and one must be known for what they are, so they can be made into what they should. Wherever one may be called an asset, wrongly, and not found to be attacked, yet called an ass, rihtly, and found to be attacked, is run by the deluded and unqualified. Sooth and ethics have no bias between positive and negative treatment. I discuss science like its methods matter, and I expect the same from others, so I lauded the first person I saw who knows how to read and interpret. Punishing users for correcting others who read and write in bad faith is wrong. What many might call a "personal attack" is a personal solution to someone's wrong behavred; they'v already had the meanings plenty explained here repeatedly. Most people prefer customs over the sooth and, when confronted with the sooth that they're wrong, they will hate the sooth and scourge the person who shows them so that they don't have to listen or think about themselves. Their spew is all over this thread. Forbidding "personal attacks," if they are riht and needed to discourage someone wilfully wrong, hurts and hinders any information source, especially if they're given along with the bare correcting.

1/f = 1/o + 1/i f = focal length o = object distance (10cm) i = image distance (15cm) Plug in the known values. 1/f = 1/10cm + 1/15cm . . . (You do the rest.)

Misunderstanding the whiteboards paper as badly as many'v here does harm to the subject itself (a new freshman in community college could interpret the arguments better than this; you'll learn simple content analysis in introductory courses). That many would post all of these Clowneries rather than read the paper first shows you are likely a dropout who doesn't know how to tell between reality and fantasy, how to verify a belief, how to premise conditions for observations that should support and defy the belief, how to recognize observations that are irrelevant to the belief. Why do so many hate the scientific method? This kind reflects the American tolerated trash who are why America is with the last in first-world STEM aptitude and industry. And who did this to them? Their parents? Their halfwitted teachers (who committed the fraud of letting them pass)? I shudder!

You're the first one with brains in the thread.

Rev says that only 144,000 can fit in the only city in heaven, New Jerusalem (which is undersea: Job 38, and the size of a country), so it should be full by the fall of Rome. The Buybull was so poorly written the savior couldn't keep track of his own words or culture so he sent himself to hell: Ps 14:1 > Mt 5:22 > Mt 23:17. Foreigners like Americans and breeders and women were condemned in most of the NT and denied covenant/salvation (Rev said women only defile so there were none in heaven). But in any case, heaven is where the moon and sun are; your heaven was a sea or lake where they swam, above a bowl that held up the rain, over a flat earth on another lake. Hell is a hole in the ground where everyone goes; your hell hasn't been on fire for thousands of years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehenna.

Since childhood I'v been working on eliminating infinities; in so doing, I independently invented a Riemannian infinity plot whilst other children were piddling their minds away going out and getting tans, or whatever they did, and later wrote a proof that it take finite vis (energhy) to accelerate mass to celerity. In any case, I'd argue everything is finite and the infinite does not and can not exist (and if it did exist, could not be known), and tangentially but importantly, infinite and eternal are often confused. The root of eternity makes it mean “however long something is,” or “lifetime,” not “after time” (“eternity” comes from the Latin words “aeternus,” which came from “aeviternus,” which came from “aevum” [age or lifetime], which came from the from Proto-Indo-European root “*aiw-” [lifetime]). Thus, everything is eternal; that is, it lasts however long it lasts. Nothing is infinite; that is, something must be quantified with upper and nether bounds. The univers has finite mass and extent; both of those values define de Broglie bounds at both ends.

What's the primary source for this quote? Nikola Tesla was a deluded hack. Radiation is the worst mode of heat transfer so his Wardenclyffe Tower couldn't supply much until it'd leak back to the environment. The radio came from Hertz and Marconi; AC power came from Steinmetz. Mythbusters disproved his earthquake machine. Scalar waves are bs. A switched-mode power supply is much more efficient than AC generators. If he had said this, only more proof of his hackery (fenomenologic idealism).

Aging (old|new; eld|young) is resultant from organic factors: ghenetic, cellular, and biochemical; that is, cellular senescense, DNA damage, oxidative stress, telomere shortening. Organisms are subject to time; time is not subject to organisms (or aging).