Everything posted by Jasper10
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Someone else explained it well in one of their posts just after my post. Scientist have a foundational logic of 0,1 and 1,0, a logic which doesn’t apply at the foundational level of magnetic force interactions.It has a logic of 0,0…0,1…1,0…1,1. We have definitive proof of this by 2 magnets 4 interactions which also confirm that the 2 foundational magnetic forces are different.Therefore it is not just a sign difference. Nonsense,they are different forces even though they both attract and repel.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Yes, and both forces attract and repel depending on their interactions with other electromagnets
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
As there are 2 off different magnetic forces in nature and nature has provided definitive proof of this then you cannot balance out these forces with each other…….why?.…….BECAUSE THEY ARE DIFFERENT!!! The only way you can balance the equation is have the 2 DIFFERENT forces on both sides of the equation.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
I have clarified my meaning.I will clarify it again. There are 2 different magnetic forces in nature and I have explained why there is with a real practical example of why these forces are different using the logic of 2 magnets 4 interactions with each other. Can you explain why therefore all the interactions of these magnets i.e. SS…SN….NS…NN are not the same?
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Hi,but I wasn’t asking about the electromagnetic fields. Are you saying that the 2 different absolute magnetic forces in nature are the same as well? They are not…so …0=1…1=0 logic is wrong and I have given definitive proof as to why it is wrong.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Sorry..what do you mean? I have asked 2 perfectly straight forward and logical questions and correct me if I’m wrong, you don’t have answers. Why don’t you say that? I know exactly what I’m talking about.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
My question is very straight forward and I have clearly stated that my question is not about the electromagnetic fields.My question is about the forces that are created as a result of the electromagnetic fields. I have also given the definitive proof to confirm that these 2 absolute and foundational forces in nature are different. What additional definitive proof do you want me to give? I therefore once again refer you back to my original post question. Also,I have another question. If all matter is exiting and entering from/into many many points, then how can it have all come from a single point and how do you suggest that it is ALL going to disappear via a single point if a lot of matter has already disappeared and will continue to disappear via many many points?
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Are you saying that these 2 different “absolute” forces of nature are the same then even though we have definitive proof that the are not the same? I am not asking a question about electromagnetic fields,I am asking a question about the different forces that are created as a result of the electromagnetic fields.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Please see post explaining what “off” means. My question is not related to the electromagnetic fields,it is related to the 2 different forces that are created as a result of the common electromagnetic fields. It is claimed that these 2 forces are the same (identical) put they are not because as I have already pointed out, if these forces were the same (identical) then when 2 magnets are brought together and interface i.e. NN…NS…SN…SS then their interactions would be the same in all four cases (the result should give either 4 attractions or 4 repulsions),but they don’t.They give 2 attractions and 2 repulsions. The fact that all interactions are not the same definitively proves that these two forces (created as a result of their common electromagnetic field) are not the same (not identical). So hence my ordinal post question.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Thanks for reminding me of the anti spam measures, so I won’t be responding further for a bit other than to say that as a N force is different to an S force and nature definitively confirms this by the 2 magnets 4 off interaction combinations then you clearly can’t compare a N force with a S force to obtain balance. You can only obtain balance if you compare an N and S magnetic force with an N and S magnetic force. Bye for now.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Can I ask……what has that got to do with 2 off magnets 4 off interactions?
-
The Consciousness Question (If such a question really exists)
You can be aware of which consciousness state you reside in…if you have awareness that is.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Well a magnet has a N & S pole. If you bring 2 off magnets together in the 4 off possible combinations of SS…SN…NS…NN then 2 off combinations attract and 2 off combinations repel. If a N force was the same as an S force then all 4 off interactions would be the same. They are not. So this is definitive proof that a N force is different to an S force. So I refer you back to the original question.
-
Why are scientist using incorrect data for their studies?
Can scientist please explain why they are using incorrect foundational data for their studies. Scientist claim that the 2 off magnetic forces in nature are the same. They are not, so why do they claim that they are and base all their studies on this false claim? The present scientific model is based upon this false foundational assumption.