Jump to content

CuriosOne

Senior Members
  • Posts

    268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CuriosOne

  1. Maybe whomever created the concept in the 1st place "didn't understand it well enough to be universal." There are better teachers out there """your obviously not one of them."""" After all, common sense says this modern stuff did not existed in Newton's time..
  2. That's funny because if I were Newton I'd say the same of your particle waves..🤣 All that computer stuff you placed up was not available to Newton, it did not exist in his time, so then why should anyone in our time bother with it.. Also, I'm not able to respond on that post you replied too "for some reason." I'm just seeing the relationship of time, length and distance and how physics creates a digital model that works in the physical world, QM is digital.. And yes, I already know no one wants to hear that..
  3. Correct I do not see them in algebrea they appear to be angle based.. For instance I've seen acceleration expressed as v1-v2 = some distance then I see that same distance / some change in time... But "where in time" is what I do not comprehend... Let's also note that "accelerations" is "relative" ie the moon "falling around earth" or radio signals bouncing off walls at a certain time dt, it would help if we mention this as "detection" disturbances or simply observations..All of coarse are created through some "physical force." You may see how all this confuses anyone when onto of this computers, people and even atoms for that matter decide to use their own number systems...
  4. That information was directly out of computer science books the "while and if statements" uses a string of number, 6556444 or a string of text dghggh and assigns a value of 0 to 1 to the string variable it creates a "length" or distances..
  5. Stop diverging my "question" its ok if you do not know the answer and please refrain the awkward and bizarre philosophy its not working with me anymore... With this said, its hard to believe that trigonometry can be used with any base numeral system when considering "magnatude and direction" acceleration and all other angle based relationships in regards to time...
  6. Are You 100% Sure On This?? Understood but: Counting by base 10= 10, 20, 30 Counting by base 2 = 2, 4, 6 Is this correct?
  7. What Base Does It Use??? For, Sin, Cos, Tan...?
  8. So from what I see, a base is "any number" So if the base is 10 10^2 = 100 or 1 Or 10, 20, 30, 40 etc ?? So if the base is 3 3^2 = 9 or again 1 Or 3, 6, 9, 12, etc ?? And where did that 2 come from?? The one in 10^2 <--- The one in 3^2<--- So "where" does sin, cos and tan come from? "as they" are a table of values among itself, and without it trigonometry "numbers" the results of the triginometry fractions are useless..I'm glad to know "highly relied on" machines, use "simple" math concepts...Maybe nature is simpler than I thought. How on earth does calculus not use numeral systems if its trigonometry based?? IE Secants, Tangent "Lines" These are straight lines, they "don't bend."
  9. Did Issac Newton know about numeral systems? IE Bases 10, 2, 1 etc etc? If not then, why do we use them "in calculus today??" Moreover, how can computers compute calculus? Issac Newton didn't have one, or did he?? Was it a Macintosh?? seriously.. This should be a very interesting thread..
  10. So you "truly" think every member in science forums around the entire world "never" take ideas from other member's posts for their own private endeavours that never give credit at-least to the science forum and its member?? Especially when those post are "public?" It's ok to say yes, but it does not mean im wrong.
  11. A base is obviously a conversion factor by 1, and a dominator is a distance from 0 to 1.....It works in reverse... A more confusing way of thinking about it is right here, copied from wikipedia.. The same sequence of symbols may represent different numbers in different numeral systems. For example, "11" represents the number eleven in the decimal numeral system (used in common life), the number three in the binary numeral system (used in computers), and the number two in the unary numeral system (e.g. used in tallying scores). The number the numeral represents is called its value. I sure will read and study this...And give it the benifit of a doubt...ThnXxxxx Ok, "Can You Show An Example?" I'm very very sorry to say this, but it sounds like theoretical number theory.. This is what's confusing...
  12. Neither does anyone else for that matter, as bases seize to exists through the use of pi ratio....
  13. I don't use practical math for my personal endeavours if that's what you mean. I read about numerolgy eons ago... Let me know what part you did not comprehend... Copied and pasted for the 2nd time.
  14. Understood...."But" it does have its own respected applications in it's own "domain."
  15. I just did some calculations with this information and I must truly say thanks.. Calculus truly makes ""more"" sense now, and I'm hoping other science members whom had years of agonizing confusion read this thread. 0 and 1 uses the concept of "distance" In computer science.. i = 0 while i < length (' ') i = i + 1 It usually applies a distance in a string of characters, numbers or letters, the very 1st character is 0.. However, I see a relationship here to length or distances in general..
  16. When you say "numerolgy" do you mean "number theory" or any other cryptography field? I just want to make sure we are on the same track....I use cryptography as it has numerous applications especially dealing with QM, in my opinion its where all the fun is at... Oh my, have i said too much now...🤣🤣🤣
  17. This is exactly what I was looking for.. The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter does not change in different bases.. """""IT'S BASE MUST BE INFINITE???""""" But as far as typical bases goes.. Example using some random numbers here.. 111.000 is base 3 ? 7656.0877 is base 4 ? 6567566.099 is base 7 ? Etc etc?? "base" is another word for distance... """"""Base 10 must be special""""""🤣😂 No Wonder!
  18. I agree "at times" there is a lot of "information" in and out of social media that is hard to keep up with. "Really" I thought you spoke "science" 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣 It has its "field" of application like religion, politics, math, science and other "fields of study....No need to be "biased."
  19. You speak chronologically?? Maybe the idea doesn't work under a certain metric unit...😎 Until you read my reply to your comment..lol
  20. I totally disagree with you because "my culture" were masters at science...So for me I'm synchronized with nature...It doesn't take me too long to figure stuff out...It does however take me time to understand "why" it's used the way it's used in our modern day and age. But regardless, there is a very big difference between infridgment and free use... And this may explain why "pro work" concludes other "in direct information" amatures ""are discovering" other than what it was intended for..... I see it all the time, they call it numerology, but I call it common sense.. This OP not only applies to science but to fashion, music, books, art etc.. This is planet earth, I keep telling people. It's not that your claiming "this", but your disprooving "this" Your thinking is very much like calculus..
  21. I can totally relate, "trust me." If you don't know of any "from your science to knowledge endeavours" then its pointless telling you. Well then, when ever you want to share your "perfect" world where everyone is equal, loving healthy, "all get paid equally for their jobs, "where women are not objects of sex but rather thinkers like everyone else" and everywhere you go others have not one single judgement on you---------> please let "the rest of us foolish people" know the location...lol...
  22. ""Yes im still confused on decimal and fractions."" My assertions are just "random" thoughts" I would "never" assert anything even if I knew it 100% I guess this leads to the more popular choice of ratios and forces of which have no dimension..Not to mention "matter" and attraction without a force of attraction, such as earth and the moon, or electron clouds attracted to protons..... "I guess." So what's the point of units then? Do we even agree on what base to use??
  23. Understood, I'm just trying to figure out if speed is radiant or ominous, and if velocity acts as a ray "for example" in a linear direction..The acceleration part I fully understand....But now comes the numbers and physics part im trying to comprehend in the Difference Quotient.. When you say constants, are these: G,g, pi, h etc etc??? ""But"" they all use base ten... Are we talking about ""decimal values"" of the constants???
  24. what is the difference between a decimal and a fraction??? From Google.. more ... A fraction where the denominator (the bottom number) is a power of ten (such as 10, 100, 1000, etc). You can write decimal fractions with a decimal point (and no denominator), which make it easier to do calculations like addition and multiplication on fractions. """"I just realized I'm getting decimal bases and fractions "wrong""""" GLAD I ASK BASIC QUESTIONS.. more ... A fraction where the denominator (the bottom number) is a power of ten (such as 10, 100, 1000, etc). You can write decimal fractions with a decimal point (and no denominator), which make it easier to do calculations like addition and multiplication on fractions.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.