CuriosOne

What I mean is when light bends in a medium such as a gas field ie fluid field in random motion with light beams or rays passing through it... Not even sure if my question is relavant, length contraction "angles" I assume they are, is confusing me.

I think I totally agree with you.. No doubt about that... Or mathinatics is not noble, in a sense to being a language..

Ok so now you have my attention... So, are these "scalers" "sharing" a constant?

This is exactly what I needed to "be sure of" !!!!!!!! THNX... The average "between" the multilple points, was what I was "deducing" either by mistake or intuition, calculus is pretty remarkable I must say...Thanks again for the PDF... Its a great way to create models of all sorts that can be of some reliability..

You obviously never taken a coarse on ciphers... 😎 I work every day and am physically fit if that's what you mean, I'm also a former model and music producer, in fact I know many celebrities and have contributed over $500.000 in free work labor, I'm a very respected artist as well "despite" the bogus reputation I've gained here...😎 Now, as far as proofs go, proof depends on a model, and there are many "i assure you" unfortunately at the sole discretion the creator, "I assume nature is included" and assume discoveries have something to do with it..."chuckles." Your correct on basic instructions due to how science refers to most if not all things as ""points"" then link these to "variables" to make things more complicated.... IE: Point particles Points "DOT" product A->B GM1*m2/ r^2 " From" center of masses" IE The Masse's "Points" Then we use math and the concept of "models??" A Theoretical Model is not 100% absolute, so there goes your proof...But they can work quite well and are "reliable." Now, The OP asks if x and dx are points on a "tangent line." Yes or No??

Whatever a tangent line is, that's what I mean.. The points of (x + delta h) In regards of these 2 points are: "2 points" on the ""tangent line?"" Linear Or 2 points on the curve itself Not linear I'm not sure due to how calculus was created for something constantly changing at some point in time....

Do points lie on tangents lines "only?" From: "The slope of the tangent" Or on the curve itself?? If it's not on the curve, then: Where did that curve come from?? I'm not getting the ideas behind the following. ( x + delta h) I'm very familiar with linear equations but this does not clarify tangent points and the "fancy" albegra doesn't explain the evolution of time either cuz it sets everything at 0... Are these Points Hyper Planes?? Light Cones?? Faster Than Light Speeds?? N Gons?? Oragami?? ----->Standing Waves Maybe???

This was until I knew about the freedom of cartography and how anyone is free to make one that's reliable..

It's not me, it's the premis of the science model... Anyone can create a cooridinent system like anyone can creat a "base & numeral system." I keep asking is base 10 Counting by 10s?? Or is base 2 County by 2s?? Simple as 1 2 3, and I get answer that sound like ""alien technology."" Earth please???

This sounds more on the line of my insight...It makes better sense, its syncronized information...

Your talking about "manifolds" hyper cubes and the fourth dimension? Now that I understand that a base numeral system is another word for a positive integer, I will research this, however eluded it might be from i as -1 of which we all know is pi ratio based.... The bullying comment was on my thread, so its directed to me however we want to do the algebrea on it....It should not by no means ellude peacfull and civil conversation between adults as it's very childish, especially on something science based...Knowledge varies from person to person for any reason at all, it's what makes life intresting And i can careless who likes me or not at the end of the day it's just me myself and I. I was just told any base numeral system can be created "out of thin air" and that calculus uses no base system... Who's not discussing in good faith again?

Yes its a question, "any base system" works, as any base system can be created out of thin air...The better one or more efficient is the winner.. So why doesn't anyone tell me this? I'm not concerned about binary numbers, computers and etc...This did not exist long ago when science was being formulated...I feel sorry for today's students that need to deal with this "simple" issue.

No, the number is geometry based, and it looks like it's in 3d looks like oragami.. On another note, I'm seeking legal advice on cyber bullying...There are some members here that are purposely creating problems for me making it very hard for a scientific conversation..

This is what I've been seeing for years.. A sequence that does not resemble ordinary numbers, that when used with all known calculations resembles something like oragami... I'm glad I ask these questions... So there appears to be a conflict between the better choice..??

Maybe whomever created the concept in the 1st place "didn't understand it well enough to be universal." There are better teachers out there """your obviously not one of them."""" After all, common sense says this modern stuff did not existed in Newton's time..

That's funny because if I were Newton I'd say the same of your particle waves..🤣 All that computer stuff you placed up was not available to Newton, it did not exist in his time, so then why should anyone in our time bother with it.. Also, I'm not able to respond on that post you replied too "for some reason." I'm just seeing the relationship of time, length and distance and how physics creates a digital model that works in the physical world, QM is digital.. And yes, I already know no one wants to hear that..

That information was directly out of computer science books the "while and if statements" uses a string of number, 6556444 or a string of text dghggh and assigns a value of 0 to 1 to the string variable it creates a "length" or distances..

I just did some calculations with this information and I must truly say thanks.. Calculus truly makes ""more"" sense now, and I'm hoping other science members whom had years of agonizing confusion read this thread. 0 and 1 uses the concept of "distance" In computer science.. i = 0 while i < length (' ') i = i + 1 It usually applies a distance in a string of characters, numbers or letters, the very 1st character is 0.. However, I see a relationship here to length or distances in general..

""Yes im still confused on decimal and fractions."" My assertions are just "random" thoughts" I would "never" assert anything even if I knew it 100% I guess this leads to the more popular choice of ratios and forces of which have no dimension..Not to mention "matter" and attraction without a force of attraction, such as earth and the moon, or electron clouds attracted to protons..... "I guess." So what's the point of units then? Do we even agree on what base to use??

what is the difference between a decimal and a fraction??? From Google.. more ... A fraction where the denominator (the bottom number) is a power of ten (such as 10, 100, 1000, etc). You can write decimal fractions with a decimal point (and no denominator), which make it easier to do calculations like addition and multiplication on fractions. """"I just realized I'm getting decimal bases and fractions "wrong""""" GLAD I ASK BASIC QUESTIONS.. more ... A fraction where the denominator (the bottom number) is a power of ten (such as 10, 100, 1000, etc). You can write decimal fractions with a decimal point (and no denominator), which make it easier to do calculations like addition and multiplication on fractions.

Understood...But when this explanation involves "nature" we bump into issues.. "A very big issue" with the base part.. I will use Gravity for example: 6.67 "times" base 10 to its -11 power .01× 667 = 6.67 Times a number between 0 and 1 as a fraction. As 1/0.1 = 10^2 or 100 cm for 1 meter "averge" It looks like the speed of light to me.. Then we have Newton's units. Units of N m^2 / kg^2 1 newton meter is said to be the torque "of circular force." Base 10 "Sounds like a ratio, or frequency or derivitive for that matter" in relation to light...And maybe Base 10 proves the more "conventional" ??? Looks like base 10 is very interesting.. """My point is, "base 10" appears to be the most popular choice in our metric system..""" not to mention that when you see g itself 9.8 m/s^-2 it appears to be closer to base 10 than any other base.. This is what has me "and so many others" confused..... Or maybe science and numbers are inconsistent with nature... """"Was This The Idea For Limits???"""" f( x+ dx) - f(x)/ dx as x->0

Why are numbers between 0 and 1 fractions? And what base uses this "rule"? Base 10??? As in % ??? Hopefully this question doesn't receive "scrutiny" It's ok if nobody doesn't know the answer..lol

Sounds he was more an astrophysicist through mystic knowledge..

Yes, but I use 3d to create 3d video games, 3d models, basically 3d "toys" and when I render the images it looks very similar to images I see in the real world.. The same is true for animations that uses the evolution of time to move. For instance, how do numbers "know" left, right, up or down?? If you say computer software programs them, then that's more than obvious, but say we do math on plain "paper" and pencil, how then can the numbers do what they do in 3d space x,y,z?? I guess I'm asking what links "instructions to numbers in the phyiscal world without computers?? The universe has been here for billions of years before the thought of the computer processor..

I've been using Maya for the past 10 years, I love 3d...