Everything posted by IDoNotCare
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
You're obviously one of the fools I systematically and physically demolished on mainstream hacking a dead forum to spite me with negs. Which would explain why I haven't gotten a single pos.That's pathetic though! Because you didn't unlock ultra instinct and your dojo sucks you're gonna hack a dead website.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
I've heard of thread hijacking, I apparently got banned for it, but I haven't heard of post hijacking. It has been substantiated. https://www.quora.com/profile/Gareth-Meredith-5/log I don't own a super computer nor do I know any computer scientists. You're all a buncha neg repping simps
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
If one extrapolates from my universola it is not easy or cheap in processor's energy requirements, but it is simple. Imagine being able to burn fat without dieting or exercising, or to learn without studying. That's what wonders can come of nanotech which requires we replace the biological components of our bodies which requires we understand how to snatch the electrons in our nerves and synapses which requires that simple yet vast mathematical regime I laid down.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
Sanity is as ill-defined as consciousness. A platitude is just something you say. Like all philosophy. I know what Eise was saying, he called me mental because I said sanity is an axiom. He said my statement was a philosophy because I said it wasn't. He was just antagonizing me as I said. You're also just antagonizing me. Either better comprehend what I wrote or I can't help you. It's in Kurt Mueller's locked topic in speculations So mathematics can define things those words he said cannot even come close to. Whereas you said it couldn't even be stated with mathematics which is false. ref The difference in time particles (4D graviton topologies) can be interpreted as lp1*9^28=hG/c^3 ->c^3=hG/lp1*9^28->c=cuberoot(hG/9^28lp1) Place c^5 into denominator for hG/c^5 for lt0 It has a different rate so even the particles that combine at the central coordinate of the singularity then start evolving inbetween different ticks of a planck clock This is the dark energy mechanism, which at certain angles is also the dark matter mechanism it's very slow but moves far very dilated 9^28 can be proved to be related to the planck density with mp~4.932*10^-36*9^28kg/(4/3pi(1.6e-35)^3)m^3 = planck density For instance, in Newtonian cubical space, your 3D model for flat coms, it's just an angle, curved depth isn't actually on the paper, just flat depth. x^2+y^2=z^2 when we have x and y. VS For curved depth, however, as is the real natural world, we use the form Quadrant 1: where a=x1 and b=y1 & a^2+b^2=C^2: 2C/pi = (x2) ; C/p i= (y2) ; (x1+y1)/2 = (x3,y3) ; C/pi = (x4) 2C/pi = (y4) Quadrant 2 where a=x1 and b=y1 & a^2+b^2=C^2: 2C/pi = (x2) ; C/p i= -(y2) ; (x1+y1)/2 = (x3,-y3) ; C/pi = (x4) 2C/pi = (-y4) etc...quadrant 3 & quadrant 4 If we want to express a curved depth as opposed to a flat depth (cubicles) we have to solve for z at f(x1)=(x5-x1) and f(y1)=(y5)^2-y1 [in the case of y5 we use the negative root] and then to create a second ring at a 45 degree angle from the first: Quadrant 2: where a=x5 and b=y5 & a^2+b^2=C^2: 2C/pi = -(x6) ; C/p i= (y6) ; (x1+y1)/2 = (-x7,y7) ; C/pi = -(x8) 2C/pi = (y8) etc... that is the difference between round and flat 3D space. Real space is neither smooth nor flat. Only then can we put every other quanta on the surface of the central planck quanta and add or subtract depth from their respective diameters, more of how to do that in the aforementioned .net topic. If you want to pool break all of cause and effect since 13.8 bill years ago. Because that surface curves and the resulting surfaces curve into fractals. Space is neither flat nor smooth. We have in today's world the true or false bit capacity to express all the points, numerically, in the universe and enough observational data to know how big the primordial smbh gravitons of lp0 have to be to create dark energy and dark matter acting upon the gravitons of lp1 and we know that the CMB was at t=380,000 years and was denser than today's universe by a factor of 1100 and the initial conditions were denser than that by another factor of 3000000 or so iirc (3 bill times current cosmic temps in kelvins) so you know that the observable region in the cmb and the golf ball in initial conditions was about 10e-10 meters or so iirc which is apart of a primordial smbh that can be constructed in lp0 space and we know the range of primordial smbh sizes in cosmology so we just simulate all of them until we get the history right. ref (with correction of the radius in x(n+1)=xn+/-(xn/r) is actually the average formula applied to 2C/pi and C/pi for the 45 degree circle slice of the sphere) The average transformations of centers for these spherical strings and gravitons arbitrated by expanding (by 1/2 lp per tp) radii of gravitons taper off, for instance at tp=2 the center of a planck quanta sphere will be moved toward the center of the graviton whose radius that central coordinate inhabits, by 1/2 the distance between that central coordinate and the central coordinate of said graviton. It should also be important to note that light is where two gws with equal pull meet from opposite directions and act on an object like a Lagrange point *x(n+1)=xn+/-(xn/r Which is to say the center of an outer sphere, from the center most sphere which overlaps the outerversal singularity, is resting atop it's surface so is going to be wider or less wide (closer or further) from a God's eye perspective which can be changed as well. So this is to say that in this 4D topology, which could be a VR as real as the universe and can be simulated because a true or false bit of information can contain many of these coordinates per second of processing, has two universes in it. There is an older and more length dilated anti-hyperbolic universe, which is not going to be as accurate as the normal universe you put inside one of it's black holes that it renders soon after the sim starts, but even if every sphere is just crossing radii the gws will still drag everything similarly in the anti-hyperbolic universe and so this will be the dark matter and dark energy acting on our universe which goes from the singularity to the eh. So the graph is not a hyperbola, it's a universola. Like a 4D mandelbrot set. Logically the big bang can't just occur as an effect without a cause. Here I just loop cause and effect infinitely like the chicken or the egg loophole.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
Notice Eise's posts are completely off the topic of the validity of philosophy and are purely structured to antagonize me based off of extranous statements made in the posts they are responding to. The patterns of the thoughts behind that communication can be graphed mathematically.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
You really have no clue what you're saying do you.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
Yes you can. Sanity is an axiomatic platitude, as is the notion of subjective and objective views as well as, for that matter, all philosophy and sensory perception. The only reality is numerical quantification. That which is not numerically quantified in sum, ergo, sum is an ontological fallacy. You have no points, I do have points, very specific points in a graph.
-
Is there such a Thing as Good Philosophy vs Bad Philosophy?
All philosophy is useless. What's the point? No, mathematically where are the points that make the laws of nature. Ontological questions are scientific not philosophical they can be mathematically pinpointed of course morality is subjective to benefit the dull creature who didn't understand those coordinates
-
Are people that do crime really responsible?
I don't believe in a brain anatomy problem more of a hivemind deciding who gets what and the result I think is pretty ridiculous
-
Should Police Departments Be Given More Money?
I agree, these are specific situations each most of the time involving either barfights or people who deal drugs, etc. The Zodiac killer is one in a million.
-
Should Police Departments Be Given More Money?
This is all innevitable in a system like this, the police will ALWAYS end up on the wrong side of justice. As I said in another topic: "You have to pump money into the system, but you are not all allowed education. That’s communism, that’s the Left, that’s the Right, that’s universal in all countries. You HAVE to pay taxes. You see an RBE is so radically liberating that none of these are requirements enforced by gunpoint. I regress, we aren’t forced to work at gunpoint directly because they trick you, you see, they knock off Maslow’s first tier of most basic needs and then get a criminal to resist so they can kill ‘em. " So no, police do not need more money or guns. We the sheeple need guns for class warfare and hostile takeover. Anarchy. May there be bank robberies, may the decadent be ripped from their luxuries homes and forced to fend for themselves on the cold streets I say! Let's do this, who is with me!?
-
Should Police Departments Be Given More Money?
Tommy Wisseau said it best, "If everyone /effed/ loved each other, the world would be a better place." Did you know that the male and female population are about equal, remove lectins from our diets early on and everyone would be pretty, another interesting fact. Between police under the pretense of anti-stalker protocol which is just determined coitus and the STD myth, I'm surprised anyone has sex ever. Then religion just strips polygamy from us which is in fact our natural hunter gatherer state. We take sex far too seriously, and then repress it beyond belief, and the result is death and murder. We need to get into the psychology of all criminals, and it has one root. We are designed for reproduction, we will take a sexual partner over food and shelter every time. Think about how no too people have the same response to visual stimuli regarding primary, secondary and tertiary sexual characteristics. The issue becomes apparent, it's blatantly obvious that criminals can be manipulated from an early age into impoverished or imprisoned status via sexual preference and this is the case.
-
Should Police Departments Be Given More Money?
This is just hired guns, completely throws off natural selection. And it doesn't work either. It's not polite to judge, imagine what they do on NCIS SPU, pure judgement. Is Jury is no more fit to judge than anyone else, God set up misery and the human response. Look through one eyeball, and you can't see past your nose, look through two and you can see right through it. If the electrons in our synapses are entangled than our memory is not local, and our senses and thoughts and feelings are one eyeball. At some point you need to consider the fact that police are really not able to do anything about crime. They do not prevent it. They just put a woman or man with their own gender and provide food and shelter. Personally I'm for mixing genders in a safe place where they can do what any person should be doing. I think the combination of religion and law is entirely homosexual in nature and otherwise pointless.
-
Should Police Departments Be Given More Money?
NO They should get out of our business and find another line of work I have NEVER needed a hired merc I'd rather die than let them capture me again. Deal with your own problems losers let God defend you and if He doesn't you're just a chicken. Anarchy