Bmpbmp1975

Not sure what that all means

Thank you

Am I right

I was reading that part but does not clarify

Thank you

Came across this interesting article about disappearing stars, there one minute gone the next. Curious to know is this in the same region of our galaxy or all over didn’t notice in the article that stated this? https://m.ednews.net/en/news/sience/408284-researchers-have-identified-100-mysteriously-disappeared-stars-in-night-sky#.Xf35w8pHSXA.facebook oh and happy Easter to all

Oh you don’t mean the void you mean where we are. Sorry misunderstood but there is no proof this ever happens and no reason to believe it could right?

No they were claiming that that is what caused it not that it’s going to happen there. Unless I missed something. And at the distance on 3 billion light years away even if it did we would not be affected in our lifetimes. Am I correct

Why worry about it if it’s 3 billion light years away? Is there a reason to worry? I was just asking if this is the only one. also not sure what you mean by our local timeframe

Thanks o totally forgot about that

So 2 weeks before his death Hawking released a paper about the end of the universe. I believe it was called exit to eternal inflation. It states that one day I am not sure timeframe the universe will end because everything burns out. I thought that that scenario already existed call Heat Death or something like that. So did he really predict this? or did I misunderstand his last paper?

Thank you but I thought that there was actually galaxies within the void. Also is this the only void

Now from my understanding there are many voids in the universe the supervoid is just bigger than the other. Am I correct? also it is not growing in size? and there are galaxies in the supervoid just not many and they are more spaced apart?

See what happens with what? also I was under the impression that the supervoid is not growing. Or am I wrong concodering the supervoid is 3 billion light years away I hope not in our lifetimes

That’s what the article states. I think theta de talking about the supervoid though

I found this article kind of cool it talks about how the cold spot can actually be made from a dent with another universe. They do think the idea is far fetched though. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-cold-spot-in-the-sky-be-a-bruise-from-a-collision-with-a-parallel-universe/ anyone have thoughts on this, also I always thought they there were more than 1 cold spot in our observable universe would that mean multiple collisions?

You don’t have to if you don’t want to but a few people have been helping me learn already on this post

Can someone explain this better to me does this tie in what mordrez explained to me or is it different

So as I stated nothing to fear in our lifetimes?

if it expands quicker it ends quicker Just trying to understand since this is local galaxy cluster

So the universe is not expanding 30% quicker in certain areas, and this is not something for us to worry about in our lifetimes then

Yes I do it’s range of detection is limited

So the 30% has nothing to do with the speed of expansion compared to another area then. and I am still trying to understand what you mean about local regions and how this has to do with the paper you keep bringing up short distance of Chandra so if this is closer is this a concern modred yesterday understood everything you thought me, today not so much lol

Thank you now what does the 30% difference of brightness mean does that mean the rate is 30% faster "Together with colleagues from the University of Bonn and Harvard University, we looked at the behaviour of over 800 galaxy clusters in the present Universe," says Konstantinos. "If the isotropy hypothesis was correct, the properties of the clusters would be uniform across the sky. But we actually saw significant differences." properties, with similar temperatures, appeared to be less bright than what we would expect in one direction of the sky, and brighter than expected in another direction," says Thomas. "The difference was quite significant, around 30 percent. These differences are not random but have a clear pattern depending on the direction in which we observed in the sky https://www.google.ca/amp/s/phys.org/news/2020-04-basic-assumption-universe.amp

I got the 10% from the estimate you gave before I am sorry. I think they said the earliest the universe can end is 2.8 billion years. Looking at 10% less I am sure I won’t be alive by then thanks for your help