Bmpbmp1975

also if it will be as powerful as they say with it not cause mass devistation. For billions and billions of light years in the vicinity? Concidering it will be more powerful that the power of every star in the universe?

Ok before anything sometime is the future define what’s exactly. Cause the article mentions they will see it within the decade I also think they said 5 years?

I think I get it

Ok your comments seem contradicting or I am not sure if I am understanding Also how do they know one will happen in the next decade they also say it will be more powerful than the power of all the stars in the universe?

I saw that but I am not sure if they meant haven’t seen it yet. I am trying to determine if they are aware of one happening or if they are looking to see if they can find one also is this something that never happened before or is it something that has happened and never been detected

Trying to understand this article. Are they stating if 2 supermassive black holes merge and are they claiming that they see 2 supermassive blackholes merging https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/03/03/the-most-energetic-event-in-the-universe-hasnt-been-discovered-yet/amp/ thank you

Thank you

What’s a mods queue

How is it now valid it is stated in plain english on the wiki page and the paper that is my point everyone says I am wrong and telling me why but no one is really showing me where and how I am interpreting the paper wrong. For all I know everyone could be hiding the truth. I don’t have understanding and I just understand what I read i am sorry to be a pain

which finds that kinetic-SZ data constrain bubble nucleation from false vacuum decay to hap- pen very recently Decay to vacuum with larger neutrino mass (may have happened relatively recently).[3 decay to the vacuum so vacuum decay (vacuum collapse) they may not know where it happened but they know it did. And it’s not all neutrinos it some they have larger mass

Exactly it could have happened anywhere and is destroying the universe from that location and will come to us.

the paper states recently how can that be 13b years ago. Fact of the matter is paper is stating false vacuum decay recently happened and they saw it. That can only mean one thing, the wiki article explains it all I read the article word for word numerous times. I am not stupid like most think here. i am just trying to figure out where they saw it and how long we have left

This is where it gets confusing for me the whole wiki page talks about it being a bad this. And the implications and the paper states that it happened How does that come to that time frame

can you please help me find the true definition online. Cause when I search all I find is the wiki page willing states end of universe. And please if you don’t mind explain how I am mis-interpreting the comments in the paper? cause all I read from the paper and wiki is bad things

I understand but false vacuum decay is a little different according to wiki, this is what the paper has stated

What do you mean I quoted 3 different ones. The wiki page on false vacuum decay is about the end of the universe and different ways. What I posted was 3 possible ways it can happen and the neutrino mass was one of them.

I am not making this into a joke. What I am saying is certain parts of the paper mentions false vacuum decay, including the conclusion and according to Wikipedia there is only one definition of it. I am unable to find any others

There is only one type of false vacuum decay, the one that destroys everything. The paper states that this is what happened to change the neutrinos mass that they viewed. So that means if it happened it’s in the process of destroying everything. the paper shows the calculations and the conclusions states it.

So it’s on its way to us then?

That’s not what it says though and even the wiki page claims the same that false vacuum decay recently happened

Yes but the paper states false vacuum decay? Have you read the paper

Regardless vacuum decay happened the time frame irrelevant now paper states false vacuum decay happened already

So why is it talking about false vacuum decay and it happening recently? You see I am not grasping what your saying but reading that false vacuum decay happened recently from the paper and the wiki site on false vacuum

As I fell onto this paper and read about vacuum decay happening because of neutrinos mass. Not that I had interest in neutrino mass. My title may have been to short. also a phase change of false vacuum means we are now in a true vacuum state. And they were able to see the neutrino mass change cause of false vacuum decay which means it happened as stated in the paper. i just wish they would have said where they saw this happen and how far away from us it happen

That’s not what the paper says false vacuum decay and it mentions it happened recently, it is also mentioned in the wiki page of false vacuum also a decay in the vacuum is pretty much vacuum decay. So basically vacuum decay happened somewhere recently and the neutrinos gained mass because of it.