Jump to content

Baron d'Holbach

Senior Members
  • Posts

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Baron d'Holbach

  1. That's a good paper, once I read the "The naturalness problem." He is onto something. He didn't solve it thou... I was not accepting him to, he would of won a Nobel prize for it, if did. But I have to say, a symmetry that can absorb and distribute energy across the field is the key. This is my approach in the book with different approaches.
  2. pg.40 I wrote on this. Well, my approach is different of course because I am building a system, my Prime Field. Ill post a few pages here. Just a random section of me talking about the meta state. A dimensional manifold goes through a phase transformation. A self-interaction within itself that discrete a unit, a manifold that builds upon itself as a layer field. The dimensionality of the manifold goes through a phase transition from a 2-dimensional manifold to a 3-dimensional manifold, which is a process the Prime Field goes through. This process leads to a compactified pressurization field that is geometrically smooth at all points in which this is a continuous spacetime process. Prime Field can go through many phase transitions. A phase transition is a change in the state of a system from one phase to another, from a global minimum state, thermal state, metastable state, and finally, to the first excited state. It can be described by ‘order parameters,’ which are thermodynamic variables that describe the different types of symmetry breaking that occur in the system. The transition from a disordered state to an ordered state is a phase transition. The Higgs Mechanism is one of the examples of such a phase transition, where the Higgs field breaks the symmetry of the standard model giving masses to the particles. A few examples of phase transitions down below: Global minimum state (Ground state) to thermal state: A global minimum state is a state in which the system’s energy is at its lowest possible value. It is the state in which all of the system’s degrees of freedom are in their lowest-energy positions. It is considered to be the most stable state of the system. A system can transition to its global minimum state through various processes such as cooling, minimization of energy, or relaxation of the system. As the temperature of a system increases, it can transition from its global minimum state to a thermal state, where the energy of the system increases due to thermal fluctuations. Thermal state to metastable state: A metastable state is a long-lived state of a system that is not the true ground state but has a much longer lifetime than other excited states. As a system cools down from a thermal state, it can transition to a metastable state. A thermal state is a state of a system that is in thermal equilibrium with its environment at a certain temperature. A system in thermal equilibrium is in a state of maximum entropy, which means that its energy is distributed among its many degrees of freedom in such a way that the probability of finding the system in any particular energy state is given by the Boltzmann distribution. Metastable state to ground state: Metastable states, also known as meta-stable states, are long-lived states of a system that are not the true ground state but have a much longer lifetime than other excited states. They are often called “local minima” of the energy landscape. The ground state is the state of lowest energy in which a system can exist when all of its degrees of freedom are in their lowest-energy positions. As a system continues to cool down or change its parameters, it can transition from a metastable state to a ground state. Ground state to first excited state: The ground state is the lowest-energy state of a system when all of its degrees of freedom are in their lowest-energy positions. On the other hand, the first excited state is the next lowest-energy state of the system, which is different from its ground state. It is a state of the system with the lowest energy among all the excited states. As the energy of the system increases, for example, by applying an external field or increasing the temperature, it can transition from the ground state to the first excited state. In the case of a particle, the first excited state is the state in which the particle has a non-zero momentum, and in the case of a field, it is the state of the Field that has a non-zero energy and is different from the vacuum state. The energy of the first excited state is always greater than the energy of the ground state, and the difference between the two is known as the excitation energy. In quantum mechanics, the first excited state is the first energy level of a system that is higher than the ground state. The energy of the first excited state is always greater than the energy of the ground state, and the difference between the two is known as the excitation energy. The behavior of systems with a continuous symmetry breaking phase transition can be expressed as a polynomial function of the order parameter (a measure of the degree of symmetry breaking) and its derivatives. The coefficients of the polynomial are known as Landau-Ginzburg coefficients. Let us try to explain this with an abridged version of equations to get a quick understanding.
  3. Yeah, this is something what I am trying to communicate but it seems I am doing it wrong. Maybe in other sites and forums I might have to strictly focus on this approach. I want to say, their might be new approaches, and new way of calculating, proofing and claiming by using other math methods in solving a problem like GUT for example. Using Zeta, Prime Numbers, Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, in finding ideas, hidden meaning in physics. A connection between branches. And using these methods, we can discover a different approach to tackle these extremely complex ideas. I stated I have, but others should incorporate wild off branches into their theory and new ideas will magically connect and make sense.
  4. @Mordred Oh no that's not what I was saying at all. I did not even realized about the paper or its claims. Mine are my own independent findings. I'm sure you have notice. Because it's absurd right What I was saying is, my work was done, and the paper and news articles supports it 😆 My ideas came from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_hypothesis I was just messing around. untill i fell into the rabbit hole and started connecting everything like a puzzle. Just a old saying from a old man I knew. "If you discover something, let it be known, because surely it will be discover by another."
  5. @Ghideon Obviously Prime mechanics wasn't written in 5 days. Worked on it from 2007 to 2023. Another reason if you read my post I absurdly state my position with authority because people in the science community love stealing other people work! https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_misconduct_incidents Because of this, scientists and people in academia are crooks, sadly. So let it be known, Prime Mechanics is published, stated and posted. Don't worry, I wrote the theory of everything. There are way more discoveries in gravity alone that is shocking, just re-read my post only, everyone else is pointless and you see I am predicting, claim, stating over 100 things. Light from gravity is 1 out of 💯
  6. Wow.... finally.... brings back memories. You should deserve a star 🌟 Why? I read all the moderators comments and silly lurkers and useless comments here and they still have no clue what a mathematical proof is. My math is 100%, just deadly correct. But it's doesn't matter! As long if the observation evidence prove it and back it up. I published Pime mechanics, March 14 2023, you know saying over the top stuff, gravity created everything, light ech..... 3 weeks later, "physicist discover that gravity created light." ...and I'm like, ..... seriously... what the heck, where's my noble prize. So, now I'm like okay, Prime Mechanics has showcase a appetizer. Let's see 👀 Earliest reports is first week of April. I haven't seen any reports earlier on Google.
  7. @exchemist Ha, thanks for clicking on my thread. With this I don't need to prove nothing anymore. Thanks my buddy. So, shouldn't a science person help a person with a medical condition? *And sadly, I can't edit my post, didn't realize there was a lock period.
  8. Best take on it 😊 Let me take a spin at it... Gravity has no origins or beginnings; it is the “emergent phenomenon” that arises from its functions, actions, and motions of itself—a one-directional wave flux. It is itself; Gravity is an indefinite motion toward the equilibrium point, the center. As an orientational acceleration system that fluxes, drags, and decays, leaving stored information behind, a trail of past information imprints can clump together, creating blocks of stored matter, constants, and properties. All the constants and properties (Fundamental and Dimensional Constants) are collected to build a smooth structure. This process is the continuation process until Aether (Big Bang aka the physical universe) is created. A negative response takes place and the expansion outwards into the creation of the 4 dimension we currently live in. LOL! I know… this is why I kept on telling to debunk it and attack it. I can’t get this out of my head. 😊 I watermarked it. Just a understanding. I use Naiver Stroke to explain Laminar flow for Aether and use it for my chip and applications.
  9. @Mordred You edited that post so many times, its amazing Because of that I will go my way. I build a system and it is not the 1960-2023. I build a concept of this -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langlands_program The link means nothing to you, it is another attack from Prime mechanics as I stated in last page, call Prime Land. I am not going the traditional approach in how you like it. And because of this it is the impossibility theory. My answer: ∫d^11x, represents an 11-dimensional integral over all spacetime coordinates, including additional spatial dimensions beyond the standard (t,x,y,z) coordinates. It requires more than the four dimensions of spacetime in order to provide a consistent mathematical framework. The principle of least action, applies equally well in higher-dimensional spacetimes as in four-dimensional spacetime, which determine the curvature of spacetime in the presence of matter and energy. In a higher-dimensional spacetime, metric tensor would take on a more complex form, and the transformations between different coordinate systems would be more involved than in Euclidean space. The Lorentz transformation you mentioned applies specifically to four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, and would not apply in a higher-dimensional spacetime. As for the inverse of an 11-dimensional tensor, its inverse would generally be an 11-dimensional tensor as well, rather than a 3-dimensional tensor. The inverse of a tensor is a mathematical concept that applies regardless of the dimensionality of the underlying space, and does not necessarily require any particular transformation laws. Pg 12 S = ∫d^4x√g [Λ(g) - 1/2κ^2(R + m^2(z)h) + L_m] where Λ(g) is a scalar function of the metric g that determines the cosmological constant, κ^2 = 8πG_N is the gravitational constant, R is the Ricci scalar, h is a transverse traceless tensor field that describes gravitational fluctuations, and L_m is the Lagrangian for matter fields. The function m(z) is a running mass parameter that depends on the energy scale z, and is chosen such that all energies are bounded between 0 and 1. The equation is well-behaved and does not have blow-ups or singularities due to the property of asymptotic safety, which ensures that the action remains finite at all energy scales. This property also resolves the hierarchy problem and the problem of ultraviolet (UV) divergences. The inclusion of a running mass parameter is a common feature and is included. However, the specific form of the function and its implications for the behavior of Gravity at high energies may depend on the particular approach taken. The use of regularization techniques such as zeta regularization to renormalize the equation is also included in this framework. Overall, the equation is designed to be finite at all energy scales, and prevents blow-ups, singularities, and infinities. The equation provided is a form of the gravitational action that unifies Gravity with matter and could potentially describe physics at energies up to or beyond 10^16 GeV, making it an example of a UV-complete of Gravity. more details on it This is the action for a gravitational theory with a cosmological constant, a scalar field h, and matter fields described by L_m. Here are some explanations of the different terms in the action: S is the action, which is a functional that describes the behavior of the system. ∫d^4x is a four-dimensional integral over spacetime. √g is the square root of the determinant of the metric tensor g, which is a measure of the curvature of spacetime. Λ(g) is the cosmological constant term, which describes the energy density of empty space. κ is a coupling constant that relates the strength of the gravitational interaction to the energy density of matter. R is the Ricci scalar, which is a measure of the curvature of spacetime. m(z) is a function that describes the mass of the scalar field h as a function of its position in the extra dimensions. h is a scalar field that describes fluctuations in the curvature of spacetime. L_m is the Lagrangian density that describes the matter fields in the theory. The action describes how the system evolves in time. The equations of motion for the fields are obtained by varying the action with respect to each field and setting the variation to zero. The resulting equations of motion describe the behavior of the system. Note that this particular action does not specify a specific gravitational theory, but rather a general class of theories that includes the cosmological constant, a scalar field, and matter fields. Different choices of the functions Λ(g), m(z), and L_m can give rise to different gravitational theories with different properties. scalar field phi interacts with gravity in a spacetime with extra dimensions. S = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi) + Λ(g) - 1/2κ^2(R + m^2(z)h) + L_m] This action includes both the scalar field phi and the gravitational terms, as well as the cosmological constant term and the matter fields. The scalar field phi can interact with the extra dimensions, and the mass of the scalar field can depend on its position in the extra dimensions. Breakdown: S: This is the action functional, which describes the dynamics of the system. ∫ d^11x: This represents an 11-dimensional integral over all spacetime coordinates. √|g|: This is the square root of the determinant of the metric tensor g, which is a measure of the curvature of spacetime. (1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi: This term describes the kinetic energy of the scalar field phi. The index i and j run over all 11 dimensions of spacetime, and the g^{ij} factor is the inverse of the metric tensor g. V(phi): This term represents the potential energy density of the scalar field phi. It depends on the value of phi at each point in spacetime. Λ(g): This is the cosmological constant, which represents the energy density of empty space. It is a constant value that is added to the action. 1/2κ^2(R + m^2(z)h): This term describes the gravitational action, which depends on the curvature of spacetime and the presence of matter fields. κ is a constant that depends on the units used, and R is the Ricci scalar, which measures the curvature of spacetime. The term m^2(z)h represents the presence of additional dimensions, where m^2(z) is a function that depends on the position in the extra dimensions and h is a metric tensor that describes the geometry of the extra dimensions. L_m: This term represents the matter fields that interact with the scalar field and the gravitational field. It can include a variety of fields, such as electromagnetic fields, fermions, or other scalar fields. The combined action describes the dynamics of the scalar field, the curvature of spacetime, and the matter fields in a spacetime with extra dimensions. The resulting equations of motion describe how the different fields interact and evolve in time. With coordinates and determinant, we will apply it to be constant and equal to 1. With this we need to perform a coordinate transformation and rescale the metric tensor appropriately. Let's denote the original coordinates as x^μ, where μ = 0, 1, ..., 10. We can then introduce a new set of coordinates y^μ such that: y^μ = c^μ + a^μν x^ν where a^μν is a constant matrix and c^μ is a constant vector. This is a linear transformation that preserves the flatness of the spacetime, meaning the metric tensor in the new coordinates is the same as the Minkowski metric tensor: ημν = diag(-1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1) To make the determinant equal to 1, we can rescale the metric tensor by a constant factor: g'μν = (det a)^(-1/2) gμν where gμν is the original metric tensor and g'μν is the rescaled metric tensor. Using these transformations, we can write the original action as: S = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g'^μν ∂_μ φ ∂_ν φ - V(φ) + Λ(g') - 1/2κ^2(R' + m^2(z)h') + L_m'] where R' and h' are the Ricci scalar and metric tensor in the new coordinates, and L_m' is the matter Lagrangian in the new coordinates. The new coordinates y^μ and metric tensor g'μν are chosen such that det(g'μν) = 1 and g'μν = ημν
  10. @exchemist Now we back to silly games. Can you debunk my theory or what. A fully dead on stop to it? If not? Just lurker around 1960s...
  11. Serious, after 20 post now you brought a made up a lie? Oh, jeez My 1st post here. After a masterpiece diagram that you can even comprehend. At the bottom I wrote: S_phi = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi)] where: S_phi is the action for the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime ∫ d^11x denotes the 11-dimensional integral over all spacetime coordinates √|g| is the square root of the determinant of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij}, which describes the geometry of spacetime g^{ij} is the inverse of the 11-dimensional metric tensor g_{ij} ∂_i phi is the partial derivative of the scalar field phi with respect to the i-th coordinate V(phi) is the potential energy function of the scalar field phi This action describes the dynamics of a scalar field in 11-dimensional spacetime, including its kinetic energy and potential energy. The equations of motion for the scalar field can be derived by varying this action with respect to the scalar field phi. The action is a scalar quantity that describes the dynamics of the scalar field phi in 11-dimensional spacetime, taking into account the effects of Gravity, Dark Matter, and Dark Energy through the 11-dimensional metric tensor g^{ij}. The action is used to derive the equations of motion for the scalar field phi, which describes how the field evolves in time and space. This is 100% correct. Dont lie now Also your Fernando thesis paper is incorrect from the equation you posted. I corrected it and you went dead silent and ignore it!! 1960s errors. Not even moderator cant even comprehend and you should of been called out for it.
  12. @Phi for All Unsupported? Dont make me laugh, my work is a masterpiece story telling from A to Z. It all sceince and is 100% correct, a simple example of the 8 pages to question upon but nothing. When I posted basics, he ask I already know that. What a funny joke. When I show the equations, it's not rebuke but now wants proofs. When I say it's inside the non-charity book, it's a Brooklyn Bridge. Sure. Mordred best attack was mathematically proof. A consistent attack on that only. ONLY on that. Think about it. Of course haven't, I mention yup it's there in the you know where and the discussion ends. Prime mechanic is only 1+ month old. About November or next year the full work will be release free. Of course not in 1 month lol. Prime Mechanics already supplied a appetizer, Google, "physicist discover gravity created light." It's only the beginning Let it be known, Prime Mechanics is fully completed, established and posted and has room to scale because it's not stale like the 1960 ideas.
  13. @MJ kihara Becareful your red marks are from 1960 old thinkers. They are stuck in old days pretending they are up to date. And will circle around stalemate ideas that goes no where! String theory and others are 30+ years old with billions of dollars spends on it with zero products and poison mutiverse ideas. At least you know and other lurkers will understand.
  14. @Phi for All It's all good my buddy. Trash it 😀 and end discontinued the thread ✨️ Substack has explained the mission to trash all 1960s ideas. And move along to next sites. My mission has been completed 🙌 Let it be known, prime mechanics has be published posted and established.
  15. Isn't String theory and QFT and all the stalemate ideas are all pet theories. String theory is one of the biggest pet theories of all times, yet people throw it around as it's not a pet, because of money, completely prove nothing and has not shipped a product for over 30+ years 😒 1960s stalemate sadly.
  16. @Bufofrog How's the new edit. Hard to say its any promotion
  17. @MJ kihara Good stuff, but... you are holding yourself back like 99% people still. Quantum Gravity and all ideas are all 1960s stalemate thinking. Outdated. New diagram Gravity is a elemental matter. Gravity itself is the creation itself. Gravity is a open and closed system that can be open to the ground state. Extracted and harvested for potential energy.
  18. What i want to test personally is my Prime Field aka my force field aka my gravity machine device that I formulated. A machine that builds and generates mass, pin points and accurately generates unlimited enegry potential. An island of stability that determines matter and the distribution of mass. A Navier stoke Laminar Flow machine in a sense. This is Zeta 1/2 system, I needed to prove but of course need money to build 😆 That's my ideal test. But of course ... we will just spend billions on a useless machine that smash particles in a tube instead. And my second test I would love to test and create is my P800 CPU. A Laminar Flow chip. It's for my robot lol. 😀
  19. All good. Within 10 years, all discoveries will be connected and associated with Prime Mechanics, stated.
  20. @Mordred No bridges lol. Remember, the proofs is the thing I stated its in, the moderator loves. So, yeah anyway. It's there 😉 Pg. 4 perfectly stated basics. 👌 , zero contradiction. Moving on, I will ask you something now 😀 No insult, no sarcastic remarks, no lazy attempt can you with everything I provided, do justice by explaining GEM with all the post and ideas I provided. You got good grasp of Einstein stuff so....
  21. That's old school way of thinking. Gravity is Spacetime. Space is gravity. My mathematical proofs are all the equations and even new discovery that will all be popping up soon. Example, gravity created light. That was stated in my work and its been discover by physicist now. And this will only be the beginning. it took 4 years until General Relativity to be proven right. So, technically all my proofs are my equations, models and countless predictions. I rather see a disprove of my equations, models and notations. Unless Prime mechanics gets billions of funding to properly study and build a gravity machine. The proof will be in the simple simplified equations, notations and soon to be discoveries.
  22. @Mordred How nice of the 1 votes , the others red are Fernando's Prime Mechanic is one of greatest scientific masterpiece of the 21 century. I would of loved for a book like this 10 years ago. Alright let’s get started So there’s a lot of problems with what you are asking. Not your fault. As I stated many times, we are stuck in the 1960s. Almost everyone can not understand Gravity, so they will rely on Quantum Gravity, String theory ideas, and old habits. Also, correct on the last post, Gravity and the universe itself is 4D. All this 11D is not necessary and wrong and must always drop back down. The extra ‘D’ is within Gravity itself. Prime Mechanic states: Gravity is an elemental matter. 1. Newtons shell theorem which shows in this case g=0. aka no gravity. Gravity is technically never zero, even at the furthest distance from an object, it will appear zero but will always have a motion within it. This is the heart of Prime Mechanic, as stated as the core tenets. Gravity is a fundamental force of 1 that is itself the emergent—the Steady State. Gravity is always in constant motion within itself that generates and layers upon itself to form energy and matter. GEM. Prime Mechanic is 100% general relativity with expansion to it. This is why I call it Final Relativity. Even in regions of space (Gravity) that appear to be empty, virtual particles are popping in and out of existence, and these particles (Gravity pockets) can have mass and energy (its Gravity itself, Dark Matter) that contribute to the overall gravitational field. This part might be too much lol, “Gravity is a self-creating particle machine. The density generates and pops virtual particles into and out of themselves (Gravity existence). Therefore, as long as mass or energy is present in the universe, there will be Gravity and vice-versa. 2. The by Fernando A. Bracho Blok Thesis paper equation. I like it. It explains that matter and energy produce Gravity. Paper is boring like all science papers lol, one of the reasons we are stuck in the 1960s, but great basic stuff overall. I think he got his equation wrong. The one you posted? (φ˙^2 + V(φ)) instead of φ2˙. The correct expression for w is: w = 1 - 2V(φ)/(φ˙^2 + V(φ)) If that is an error, the thesis might be full of e…..? No offense, Fernando. Prime mechanic has been published 😊 So, Prime Mechnaic is proving the opposite of Fernando A. Bracho Blok Thesis paper while agreeing too. He and all are always 50% right. The other 50% is that Gravity within itself created energy and matter. GEM No offense Fernando, but papers like yours will always keep people stuck in the 1960s. Sorry. PM is GR 100%, with this understanding, there are dozens of ways to explain this. As stated in point 1, we can start building a system automatically. So, with that mention, I will explain it like this. 3. GEM created the physical universe, aka the big bang. Gravity self-attracted itself, causing energy into matter to become more and more concentrated in certain areas, eventually forming a massive, dense object. This geometric object is concentrated enough that it reaches a point of infinite density and temperature. This would result in the formation of a singularity. Once the singularity is formed, it becomes unstable and rapidly expands, creating a massive release of energy and matter that we know as the Big Bang. As the universe expands and cools, the energy and matter from the singularity will eventually form stars, galaxies, and planets. (This is written here like this, the book is well written of this story) Now show the math of this impossibility, right? Let’s call this Prime Field 0.4 equation. Here I will explain a 4 Dimensional system. Starting off as an open system, it can exchange energy, matter, or information with its environment. I am basically saying that Gravity is self-interacting with itself. After, I will explain a transition to the singularity (I won’t explain it here, its in the book with Ricci ideas) After I will resolve the singularity into the big bang After the system becomes a closed system So yes, Gravity plays a significant by affecting the Hamiltonian term, which describes the system’s energy. It includes a gravitational potential term, it has a dynamic im-pack on the system and the transformation of the system and the distribution of matter in the system. I also sneaked in my Riemann zeta function into this 😊 Math: dρ/dt = -i[H_grav+H_matter, ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j† - 1/2{L_j† L_j, ρ}) + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ) This equation is known as the Lindblad master equation and describes the time evolution of the density matrix ρ of a quantum system in the presence of both a Hamiltonian and interaction with the environment. Here are the individual terms: • dρ/dt: This is the time derivative of the density matrix, which describes how the system’s state changes with time. • -i[H_grav+H_matter, ρ]: This term describes the effect of the Hamiltonian terms H_grav and H_matter on the density matrix. H_grav is the Hamiltonian that describes the gravitational potential of the system, while H_matter is the Hamiltonian that describes the matter distribution in the system based on prime number sequences and their relationship to the Riemann zeta function at the point 1/2. The commutator [H_grav+H_matter, ρ] is used to describe the time evolution of the density matrix due to the Hamiltonian terms. • ∑j (L_j ρ L_j† - 1/2{L_j† L_j, ρ}): This term describes the effect of the interaction with the environment, modeled by jump operators L_j. The first term in this expression describes how the density matrix evolves due to the system-environment interactions, while the second term describes the effect of the environment on the system by “collapsing” the density matrix. The sum over j accounts for all possible interactions with the environment. • δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ): This term describes a hypothetical mechanism for preventing the system from diverging or collapsing completely. It adds a small amount of noise to the density matrix in the form of a delta function, which keeps the system in a stable state. dρ/dt = -i[H_grav+H_matter+H_singularity, ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j† - 1/2{L_j† L_j, ρ}) + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ) This equation is similar to the previous one, but includes an additional Hamiltonian term, H_singularity, which accounts for the gravitational potential of a singularity at the center of the system. dρ/dt = -i[H_grav+H_matter+H_cosmological, ρ] + ∑j (L_j ρ L_j† - 1/2{L_j† L_j, ρ}) + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ) This equation includes an additional Hamiltonian term, H_cosmological, which accounts for the cosmological constant and the Big Bang event. The cosmological constant is a term in Einstein’s field equations that describes a repulsive force that counteracts Gravity and causes the universe to accelerate in its expansion. The Big Bang event refers to the moment of the universe’s origin, when it began expanding from a single point in space and time. The delta function in this equation describes the transition from an open system to a closed system. If the system undergoes a Big Bang event with a cosmological constant and subsequently turns into a closed system: dρ/dt = -i[H_grav+H_matter+H_cosmological, ρ] + δ(|ψ><ψ| - ρ)/(100/γ) where H_grav is the Hamiltonian term due to Gravity for a 4-dimensional system, H_matter is the Hamiltonian term due to the matter distribution according to prime number sequences and their relationship to the Riemann zeta function at the point 1/2, H_cosmological is the Hamiltonian term due to the cosmological constant and the Big Bang event, and the delta function describes the transition from an open system to a closed system. Overall, this a Lindblad master equation with an additional Hamiltonian term due to the cosmological constant and the Big Bang event. The system undergo a Big Bang event and becomes a closed system, and the delta function in the equation represents the transition from an open to a closed system. The Hamiltonian terms H_grav and H_matter represent the gravitational potential and matter distribution of the system, respectively. The equation also includes the Lindblad terms, which account for the interaction with the environment modeled by jump operators L_j. Finally, the last term in the equation adds a small amount of noise to the density matrix to prevent the system from diverging or collapsing altogether. The end This system explained a transition from an open to a closed system. Here on the closed system, we are a flat surface that stays the same forever. An unalterable flat field that will continue to expand forever. …. Seriously, that’s it…., I wrote and published this in prime mechanic in a book format. My book should technically be the standard for Gravity and the theory of everything. I also use PM applications as a tool to create a Terminator robot, lol. Proving how to create a sentient machine. I know my book is claiming the theory of everything, ironically,…
  23. Yes, I do. It is overwhelming. Thats why I simplified all my equations and ultimately ended with GEM. I will work on your equation and apply it to GEM and see what happens. Not sure when ill post back but will with hopeful results. Cheers Edit* its funny that when I over look the above equation, my simplified equations are better, but owell... Challenge accepted anyway, just a added equation for GEM.
  24. You are right. I philosophize the theory. GEM = Gravitational Elemental Matter, It’s about Gravity as the steady state, a force that interacts with itself (internals) that leads it to build upon itself (externals) that generates electromagnetism and strong and weak force. I am stating that Gravity created energy and matter (GEM) from itself that led the way to the physical creation, aka the big bang. Yeah, do not worry, I know… This is an impossible task, and no one said and done it and explained it like how I am saying it. So what do I do? Furthermore, how to even do this? I am serious, already stated this: Let it be known that Prime Mechanic was published on March 14, 2023. Conceptualized in 2007, drafted in 2012, reworked in 2016, and finished in March 2023 at the age of 36. Let it be known: Only 3 people have gotten it right Newton = Gravity (Principia) Einstein = Gravity (General Relativity) Delamotte = Gravity (Prime Mechanics) So what’s the math I am using? (Note to reader, I am doing the impossible) Riemann zeta function Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture Hodge conjecture Yang-Mills existence and mass gap problem Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness P versus NP problem Poincaré conjecture All Clay Mathematics Institute questions and all the unsolved math, physics, and science-related questions combine as 1 to solve this. Prime mechanic is Yes, and states them all as all True. Prime Mechanic is the true Langlands program. It should be called Prime Land! Where to start the impossible? Let us build a Field. A Prime Field. Sure, with what? Showcase Riemann zeta function as correct, Introduce Prime Numbers, Prove Prime numbers and its conjectures, and, place them in the Field. Solve Zeta and use that as a guide foundation. PM pg, 10 “Throughout the chapter, you will see Prime Numbers as a representation of Nature, Forces, and Constants;” “Prime Mechanics, two philosophies are called the Repetitious Function and the Loop System. The Repetitious Function is a systematic iteration, a continuous, repeated, deterministic polynomial-time towards the equilibrium point called Aether. The Loop System is a periodic operation of two. The first is a systematic operation of repeating two arithmetic operations that decrease/collapse into a positive integer of 1. The second systematic operation is a reversible loop that switches number positions, moves upwards, switches again to follow operation one, and begins a loop operation downwards.” Prove Prime numbers, Twin primes, Prove Collatz conjecture, okay, sure. Apply this to Prime Field with Zeta as the primary guide. PM pg, 11 “The Prime Mechanic system employs a geometric space with manifold dimensions and curvature to explain a dimensionless field based on natural mathematical numbers.” Sure, but how? PM pg, 11 “The Prime Field is governed by a fundamental dimensional constant of 1/137, which sets the order for the numerical values of the key components: One Gravity, One Aether, Three Strong Forces, and Seven Weak Forces. The foundation of the Prime Field is represented by the number 1 (11), which corresponds to the 11 dimensions comprising the gravitational constant Field within the system.” This is philosophy, Thanks Poincare for this it means nothing to you but everything to me to work with. The first 10 pages is Prime mechanic philosophy. PM pg, 12 S = ∫d^4x√g [Λ(g) - 1/2κ^2(R + m^2(z)h) + L_m] where Λ(g) is a scalar function of the metric g that determines the cosmological constant, κ^2 = 8πG_N is the gravitational constant, R is the Ricci scalar, h is a transverse traceless tensor field that describes gravitational fluctuations, and L_m is the Lagrangian for matter fields. The function m(z) is a running mass parameter that depends on the energy scale z, and is chosen such that all energies are bounded between 0 and 1. The equation is well-behaved and does not have blow-ups or singularities due to the property of asymptotic safety, which ensures that the action remains finite at all energy scales. This property also resolves the hierarchy problem and the problem of ultraviolet (UV) divergences. The inclusion of a running mass parameter is a common feature and is included. However, the specific form of the function and its implications for the behavior of Gravity at high energies may depend on the particular approach taken. The use of regularization techniques such as zeta regularization to renormalize the equation is also included in this framework. Overall, the equation is designed to be finite at all energy scales, and prevents blow-ups, singularities, and infinities. The equation provided is a form of the gravitational action that unifies Gravity with matter and could potentially describe physics at energies up to or beyond 10^16 GeV, making it an example of a UV-complete of Gravity. I want to know only Gravity, GEM! Where do we go here? Back to the Prime Field. Gμν = 8πTμν + Λgμν = 2π(α^2 + θ_W^2) ħ^3 c^5 / [(4πα_s G)^2 m_p^2] * (ζ_R(1/2) / ζ_R(1))^2 + (Q - W) The equation is Einstein’s field equation, which describes the relationship between the curvature of spacetime and the distribution of matter and energy. The left-hand side of the equation represents the curvature of spacetime, which is determined by the distribution of matter and energy represented by Tμν, and the cosmological constant Λ. The right-hand side of the equation represents the thermodynamic effects of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, weak, and strong) on the system, as well as the thermodynamic processes occurring within the system, such as heat exchange (Q) and work done (W), which affect its energy (ΔE). The right-hand side of the equation are the sources of the gravitational Field. The first term on the right-hand side represents the energy-momentum tensor of matter and radiation, while the second term represents the cosmological constant, which is a constant energy density that drives the expansion of the universe. Prime Mechanic states that the creation of particles from the vacuum state occurs at a specific energy scale, which is related to the Riemann zeta function evaluated at 1/2. This energy scale is often referred to as the “vacuum energy” or “zero-point energy.” PM pg, 19 “Before we dive deeper into building the Prime Field in Chapter 2, a place with a grid, a place of position that we know excitation can exist. We must discuss the incremental steps of the system cores—the system’s functions, actions, and motions.” So you are still introducing Prime Mechanics and only on page 19 out of 340? And from 29 to 40 you explain what the heck is these buzzwords open and closed Gravity? It is not a buzzword. It is Gravity. Gravity can be opened, closed, extracted, and harvested for potential energy. Finally, I made it to the ground state. And the construction of the Prime Field. PM pg, 45 Must show proof of Zeta to be true and apply it the Field. Use the prime number as a distribution center and determine the exact location of potential energy. I stated this above what I am using, Math? Prime Field is based on this: s = 1, which means that the function goes to infinity at that point. Re(ζ) = ½, which means all real numbers are place here. s = 0, which means the singularity, is undefine and removable. Once figured out and showcased, lets move on. Prove it: ζ(1/2) = 2(2π)-1/2 Γ(1/4) ∑n=1^∞ σ0(n) n-1/4 We are on page 60-340 We will apply Yang Mill’s equations and math to solve mass gap, symmetry breaking, and particle creation. And so much more. Remember, we will apply all to the Prime Field. F^μν = ∂^μA^ν - ∂^νA^μ - i[A^μ,A^ν] Remember, we are building a Field, a Prime Field, A geometric structure—Gravity itself. PM pg, 70 We apply Hamiltonian, Lagrangian, Hilbert space , Yang-Mills, Noether’s theorem, Gauge Fields, QCD Simple math: S = ∫ d^4x [L(Q) + JQ - mΦ(Q)] So far, Prime Mechanics must have over 100 concepts, conjectures, and ideas, and it's only page 70. Prime Mechanics continues, explaining Mass gap, symmetry breaking, Chiral symmetry, prove the steady state and explains Deformation. Later we continue and explain Gravity force with: G_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi T_{\mu\nu} + \frac{\omega}{\phi^2} \left( \nabla_\mu \phi \nabla_\nu \phi - \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} \nabla^2 \phi \right) This leads us to: E = G/EM11 * P0^2 * Prime(1/2) Where: E represents the energy generated by the gravitational interaction between matter (M) and the gravitational field (G). EM11 is the constant related to the gravitational energy matter. P0 is the rapidly approaching function, which approaches 0 near 0. Prime(1/2) is the well-behaved function that does not blow up or become infinite as s approaches 1/2. This equation suggests that the energy generated by the gravitational interaction is proportional to the product of the gravitational energy matter constant, the square of the rapidly approaching function, and the well-behaved function evaluated at the central point s = 1/2. It also implies that the gravitational interaction between matter and the gravitational field is seamless, smooth, and behaves well, without any infinities or singularities. This will lead us to create a smooth curve to map a smooth function onto a physical system. This creation process is the building block of creating a smooth curve at 100% mapping points. The creation of Matter. The achievement of a geometric curve, a smooth, flat curvature motion. It is based on P=0 and P ½. The fastest 1,2 step process at the gravitation spot of the massless location to form a unit number 1. Here we will combine the major players to the Prime Field. We will add Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer idea and the elliptic curve to understand The Field and position better. From Page 100 to 200 We prove Prime Numbers, Prove Finite, Prove Infinity Limits, prove Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, P=NP, Prove smoothness, Prove transformations and so much more. My favorite was transformations, an invariant transformation from one to another. And around this point: Δ = g^(-1)(∂^2/∂z_i ∂z^i) where g is the Kähler metric on the manifold, z_i are complex coordinates, and z^i are the complex conjugates of the coordinates. We can conclude that parallel lines in a plane intersect at a point at infinity and are the origin spot ½. A positional spot that densifies and transforms, and extends into another with an invariant property. This, in return, generates a temperature distribution throughout and becomes, over time, radioactive; hence Gravity becomes Elemental. I am establishing my main theory that Gravity is ELEMENTAL. I will not add any more; I will speak only on the above as this is enough. You must understand that I am building up the Prime Field System, a step by step approach and coming to a conclusion. From discrete units to a continuous smooth system. Everything I missed? I actually have it, but not posted here. I have all unsolved questions sprinkled in the book. Answered or not but is inside as a connection of 1. I use Riemann zeta function as my primary tool. They are not the same but very similar, but Zeta is more complex and more intuitive. s=1 And the coordination are used with Prime distribution, Zeta and Symmetries.... eg, reflection symmetry. And what I found interesting is any missing concept or theory or idea and later apply to GEM makes GEM even more correct? If you haven't notice name is Baron d'Holbach, this should mean to others is that, yes I tried my best to debunk my own theory but couldn't. GEM = Gravitational Elemental Matter
  25. I am assuming this? S_phi = ∫ d^11x √|g| [(1/2) g^{ij} ∂_i phi ∂_j phi - V(phi)] 11-dimensional tensor is a 11-dimensional tensor. The metric tensor is a rank-2 tensor that relates the distances between nearby points in spacetime. Its inverse g^{ij} is also a rank-2 tensor, but with the indices raised and lowered using the metric tensor, such that g^{ij} g_{jk} = δ^i_k, where δ^i_k is the Kronecker delta symbol. The inverse metric tensor can be used to raise and lower indices of other tensors, and other parts. This is where Prime Mechanics goes beyond anything. I am trying to explain, in which I had done, (Prime Mechanics) that gravity has internals. It is a open and closed system that can be open and harvested and extracted of its energy potential. Using tensors and other methods on gravity itself and explaining dark matter as a building block that we can use 'action' upon it. These are the proofs and claims prime mechanics are making. Now let me state this. It's not the traditional string theory 11 dimensions that people need to worry about. It's about gravity and it's internals and externals. I am stating that gravity created from itself energy and matter that led the way to the physical creation aka big bang. So, explaining that gravity itself can be build. GEM 11 Dimensions are my tools and connections to prime numbers as I stated as a guide, as a proof mechanism to lead me towards this. Anyway, it is another unification equation to combine all fields as 1 and describe it as full unification. Your next post I will answer once I get home. Its the most crucial post you ask of. 😀 it's actually the heart of my work, so it will be answered 😀
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.