farolero

that take us to what make us an individual?

we are defined by our memories and genetic make up and in the 4 worlds the cat has identical genes and identical memories

and if this is true then the question is whats your chance to live certain event?

in this case shroedinger life terminating device makes the cat have a bigger chance that the world he inhabits is a winning one

if when you die some alien with advance tech clones you and transfer your memories how would you be able to tell the difference?

lets suppose i want to test this gambling method myself in the case i had nothing to lose

i start in 2^1000 worlds and lets consider that though we have identical biological make up and identical memories in the 2^1000 worlds we are different persons

i want to test if this gambling method can work, well the basic thing is that after 1000 tries all my twins will be death but there will be at least one survivor

and to that survivor the gambling method no doubt does work, the rest didnt have the chance to realize they were wrong

so even being different people the perception of the observer would be the method works for you have no perception while death

theres this comercial that shows the many worlds school, for what we know it could be just like that and dont notice the worlds would be overimposed and come in and out of existance and we wouldnt have the slightest clue on it:

maybe in two seconds everything changes and the nazis won wwii or the romans are still dominant and we didnt even notice the change

edit:

i have the personal theory that dreams are perceptions from yourself from another parallel worlds, bizarre dreams are just bizarre dimentions,a fter all there are many

so when the cat dies by the life terminating device he will just wake up in another world, saying to himself:

boy what a bizarre dream, i was a cat and a german guy was torturing me with wild experiments

the math is easy but maybe im misslead:

before starting to play roulette the cat lives in 4 worlds

in two he wins and in two he loses

but the two in which he loses in one he dies

so final result he lives in 3 worlds in which in two he wins and in one he loses and he is not taking his debt to heaven

so if shroedinger cat is a gambler and every time he loses a life terminating device is connected on a 50% chance wouldnt the many worlds school give him a 75% edge? for of 4 worlds he just lives in 3 in which in two he won and in one he lost at roulette

i tried to post some creative art i did here and im not sure if i didnt post it or it got deleted though i cant imagine why

so heres a small scifi comic i did some time ago on a reflection if mankind can achieve some day immortality through clonation and ego loading the sixth day movie way:

what do you think of it i dont know if i should continue making comics:

http://s40.photobucket.com/user/raaaid/media/comic2/1_zps1rp0ynb2.jpg.html?sort=3&o=0

That requires a great deal of work

youre right though i can convert a 4 coordenate segment in an euclidean plane into 3 coordenates in an shrinking plane this conversion when its made by a computer requires a test of trial and error with all numbers till it gets the right values

so even if this algorithm to compress info was right computers dont have enough process power to do this but with very small numbers

anybody knows if fast quantum computers are any near in the horizon?

really my problem makes me realize were stone age actually

well the two threads are very related i claim size can be taken as a dimention he claims gravity is a fictitious force from a change in the dimension of size,(the part that i understood)

curious synchronicity such bizarre unusual similar ideas are found one together with each other in the same place

for most people this microexpresions are not counciously noticed but i have the curse to have an ultrafast sight which allows me to coucnciously notice and freak out, not in vain i got to be number one of 52000 playes hotlapping in raceroom sim

compare politicians or people who inspire trust with those who freak you out but and you dont know why

first this inspire trust:

these other instead are going around subcounciously freaking people out by an uncanny valley feeling:

so my compressor works you can test it here.

http://smallbasic.com/program/?QJS160

edit:

im pretty sure now that by translating between 4d and 5d i can compress any number given enough pc power with the exception of prime numbers

well i hit into a tuff problem in my quest for the universal lybrary:

computers dont have enough power theyre stone age and maybe even we live in dark times too, we just have nothing better to compare to

i think ill have to wait at least 20 years before developing my concept

ok ruunning out of argument as i can express a segment with 3 coordenates you go on in an ad homine

well is that a question im force to answer if i dont want to be silenced?

this problem takes us to fermat and irrationality but well who cares ill solve it with computer brute force and an aproximation

computer brute force is very slow i hit myself in the face with this algorythm.

a2=b2+c2

ill have to solve it if i want to uncompress info

ok check this out it explaints it pretty well:

al this segements are defined as having an x size and y size of 1 but each is different by the third coordenate of total size:

any help on how could i translate this for algorythms for my compressor?

you see this takes us at what strange pointed, the fourth coordenate is encoded in space time the ordered info from the universal lybrary

all i know about the akshic library is what a friend told me about it, something where all the universe information is safe orderly, maybe i used the wrong name for this place

anyway do you agree now that in this five dimentional space though it has more dimentions it needs less coordenates to define a segment?

i hope to have been didactic and have made you see my point

i think if im right on the coordenates thing in less than one week ill be compressing info then ill just need some time more and uncompress info with inverse entropy

the first word i want to uncompress is love to see what turns out

anyway the problem is pretty simple and can be translated to euclidean geometry

i wonder how this was kept secret:

instead of defining a segment as (11)(22)

i define its size along x axe equal to 1 and size along y axe equal 1 then i measure the distance of the closest point to x axe equal 1

so the segment defined before as (11)(22) is now defined as (111)

prescholar maths silenced as hippassus the discoverer of irrationaly was silenced or galielo was silenced or giordano bruno was silenced or as i will be soon silenced

science the new church the old dog with a new collar

alll you need to know now the position of the segment its its real size is it one meter big so its cd or 4 meter big and its ab?

this is the algorythm ill be using for my compressor:

its an space where motion its an illusion, maybe time too

notice in this space a straight line is an spot since theres no motion

the universe must use some method to store info orderly im researchig the method the universe uses

i made a diagram now accounting for x and y size things are begining to take shape.

sorry but i dont know how to make a diagram with my pc

so im figuring out:

two coordenates would be the balls relative sizes along the xy axes

the third coordenate would be the frame size which can vary as well, that would be th oberver size:

so this is how i define two example segments in this non euclidean space :

notice zero and negatives are a problem here but this is enough to start working with a new approach for my compressor of random info and quest for the key for the akashic library

i think im clearing my mind check the diagram i did i explain here how just 3 coordinates might be enough:

i still havent figured out but ponder this:

a mathematician looking at a perspective picture could take a segment in 3d space defined with 6 values

and just meauring 4 values of that segment in the perspective picture he can figure out the 6 values

i came here for help to figure out how does he do that

ok i think i can explain it just acounting for the size dimention:

you define a segement as :

1) its size( which defines as well the y component)

2)the x axe displacement

3) the rotation, (where it cuts the y axe)

wouldnt that fully describe the position of a segment in space?

i didnt come here to argue but for help

1 apple divided by 1 apple equals 1.

Not one apple

maybe i should take prescholar again because i dont know how its applied to the real world dividing one apple bewtween one apple

could you offer me a real world example of this operation?

this is a new geometry not used before based on motion as illusory

that is a five dimentional space dont imply five coordenates your oversimplyfing things

i got it wrong in my previous post:

imagine there are two spheres at (44) and (-44)

i double the size of both so now the apparent coordenates are (22)(-22)

i double the size of one and keep the other so now

(22)(-44)

so just used 2 coordenates for all this i just would need a third to consider the segment moves along the x axe

this is pretty easy to understand i see it peerfectly and im not intelligent just creative

but of course you didnt come here in a positive constructive way you just come here for arguments

well have one

if i was a mod i would lock this for people just come here to argue not to be any constructive ill just go to another place with less negative people

strange studiot morder i think its better if i start defining a segment:

a segment in this 5 dimentional space is defined as :

the global size of two spheres defined by a single coordenate

and its global rotation defined by two coordenates

so where an euclidean space i need 4 coordenates in a five dimetional space i just need 3

so thats why god put negative people in the world, so they can boost the good people, interesting

i didnt come here to argue but to develope my ideas on a 5 dimentional space to compress info or uncompress it

basically i claim that a four side polygone i can express it with 7 coordenates fully in a 5D space and not in 8 as a 4D space does

those coordenates would be the size of each sphere that is in each corner

and then i should account for a global inflation just in a single direction like you grow on the x axe but not in the y axe as when it appears you just move on the x axe

to acount for the direction i use two more coordenates and another coordenate for this offset global inflation

so translatimg from 4d to 5d i go from 8 coordenates to 7 the magic number

it was the first thing that ocurred to me since this thread its about space time

actually i should have asked what s=vt mean

so what im working on now is define a four side polygon that in an euclidean space is defined with 8 coordenates just define it in a five dimensional non euclidean space with just the four coordiantes of size

so if i have:

AB

CD

i can shrinking all abcd equally with which it moves along both axes equally or just shrink ab and leave alone cd with which just one side of the polygone moves

ok so i have a square defined as a(11)b(21)c(12)d(22) i euclidean space

in a five dimentional space i would define it as (1111)

if the euclidean space changes to (22)(42)(24)(44) the five dimetional space square changes to (2222)

if the euclidean space square changes to (22)(42)(12)(22) the five dimentional square changes to (2211)

seems an equation would solve the translation between dimentions

definitely writting things down to explain ideas help

Talking of topic I don't understand the title of this thread if you are not discussing Newtonian/Euclidian physics.

 

By the way the fourth 'dimension' in 4d relativity space is not time but ict.

Using time alone has the wrong units.

And the square root of minus one has to be included to get the metric signs right.

if you double the size of a clock the speed of the pendulum doubles as well so time and size are relatives

to move along the x axe first you inflate as time slows dow but to pass the zero mark you inflate infinitely and then when time becomes zero time reveses and inflation changes to shrinking

so to move along the x axe you can inflate in positive time or shrink in negative time both appear to be the same as constant motion

so in this perspective time is a relative of size and it can go negative

edit.

the main advantage of this perspective is that i can take an euclidean space and define it with 7 values for each objet

but in a 5 dimentional spacetime i could define all those objects with 5 valuues

this would allow to compress info or do the opposite which points to be a key to the akashic lybrary where all knowledge of the universe is contained

my consideration is that when i move along the x axe i inflate my front in positve time and shrink my back in negative time

right now im working on a compressor acounting for this

Slower, yes.

But if you put a clock, or a metronome in the car, you will see that the tick on the far away car keeps ticking at the same rate. The shrinking effect of perspective does not act on time.

its not the same the time rate which is constant that the time speed that varies with size

our perception of time goes in function of time speed, time rate is an arbitrary measure cause size changes

as i said a bigger pendulum to keep a constant period with a bigger distance to run goes faster which gives a slower pereption of time by the limit of light speed, just as einstein lightclock at relativistic speeds

excuse me but i have better things to do than discuss with a guy who belongs more to an orwelian world where he has fun discussing 2+2=5 with the handicapped prisoners than to a decent world where people try to understand how things work and quest fo the truth

you dont even qualify for prescholar if you dont even understand relativity of size even after being throughly explained so go on filling your mouth with eisntein relativity and keep singing maantras you dont even have the slightest clue about

youre the example of this failure of educative system where memorization rules over creativity and a parrot could get any degree

since youre not answering my question and lack prescholar education ill ignore you from now on

if somebody who understands my point has any question ill be glad to answer them

Please explain how you would distinguish between your model and the standard one.

 

(And stop whinging about me asking questions. I assume the reason you posted your idea was to get some criticism of it.)

 

No.

the standard model is a four dimentional euclidean model my model is a five dimentional non euclidean model where motion doesnt exist is just an illusion

i love you to ask questions but please answer mine

ill ask again:

if two guys are floating in space and they grow in size(thing they dont notice because of relativity of size)and they have a ruler with them how will they measure their distance?

when you have answered this question ill go on traspassing a two m distant mark

ok so i think we can agree this conception of space is not euclidean

do you all agree?

its a five dimention spacetime while euclidean spacetime is four dimentional

but actually is a simplified space time

in euclidean space there are 7 posible variables

x translation y translation z translation x rotation y rotation z rotation and time

while in the spacetime i propose there are just 5 posible variables:

x rotation y rotation z rotation size and time

edit :

this idea could be as well to compress info

two determine whats going on with a particle in space euclidean would need 7 values which i could compress to five values

i could take a book and interpret the letters as coordenate numbers of things in an euclidean spacetime

i would pass those coordenates to my spacetime and hence i would have compressed the book (7/5)*100%

ok since nobody is bringing up good arguments ill bring them myself

how can i say i can define all the position of objects in an space time with five coordenates while euclidean spacetime needs 7 coordenates thats a wild affirmation

if you call size a single dimention isnt posible and object grows in the x axe of space and shrinks in the y axe?isnt that a posible motion?

yes thats right but in this new spacetime due to conservation of momentum timerate and size product its constant with which both values are autoeliminative and you just account for them in 3 axes of space at the same time

for example if you double size in the x axe timerate will half in the x axe and if at the same time you half size in the y axe timerate will double in the y axe

so they are autoeliminative and you can account just for size along all axes and time along all axes instead of accounting them for each axe

edit:

this is where my concept bogles the mind:

if you grow 1 m in one second in the x axe and you shrink 1 m in minus one second in the y axe youre spacetime remains continuum and constant and you just have the peception you advance one m in the sense determined by your rotation coordenates

edit:

i just can not believe what ive just found:

the key for the akashic library

when i define a the midnight summer book as the coordinates of an euclidean space and redefine those coordintaes t a five dimentional space i will have saved 40% of pages

and when i reinterpret those charachters as coordenates of an euclidean space and redfien that sapce to mine i will have saved another 40% pages

till eventually i get a single word which defines the whole book

i wonder what would happen if i did the opposite with for example the word love

im on it thanks guys for making me think farther theres nothing like explaining things to understand them better, so thanks a lot strange