Vexen

If these are your own thoughts on the Big Bang Theory, I'm not willing to consider them. If you willing to refer me to an expert who proposed a similar concept, fine. But, I can't take the opinion of a self taught physicist seriously.

Talk about alternative theories in a unique manner (and provide references) but avoid suggesting your own Theory of the origin of the universe.

Does it provide raw data that are analysed? It's much easier to understand concepts when you can work through them.

I'll be doing some molecular cloning this year. Any advice on protocols and data analysis?

Lawrence Krawss provides a good hypothesis to answer this question. His explanation pertains to the "strangeness" of quantum mechanics.

Check out his youtube videos or maybe somebody here could explain his ideas.

"Here is a tree in the garden. And every summer it produces apples. We call it an apple tree. Because the tree apples. That's what it does.

Alright, now here is a solar system inside a galaxy. And one of the peculiarities of this solar system,at least on planet earth, the thing peoples.

In just the same way that an apple tree apples." - Alan Watts

I have penned all my Ideas and Theories in Maths , Physics , Puzzles and Religion on this site even though not in any other authentic Journal.

 

This gives me a great satisfaction as there is some record of my Contribution to Human Thinking !

Only a few people actually have a concise idea of your views. Your thoughts on science and philosophy are scattered throughout this forum and would be very difficult to find.Rather, write a blog to keep an accurate record of your ideas.

Personally, I haven't lived a full life, having accomplished a very minimal amount of my goals. Therefore, I can't die tomorrow.

Thanks

Why?

I'll make better posts with my new account.

Thanks

How do I delete this account?

Just got off a 2 week ban for losing it.

Need to trash this account and create a new one.

Thanks

Garbage in, garbage out.

Could you explain it?

Thanks

Nobody read any of my ppsts before I started to loose it.

I posted scientific evidence that politics may be a pivotal factor in radicalisation. Everyone ignored that and proceeded with their own opinion.

I don't get it.

!

Moderator Note

Vexen Do not insult the membership again. Do not respond to this moderation. If you feel it is unjust report this post.

You're a loser.

They won't know. Nobody will.

I'll just use a different IP to sign up.

I'll be less opinionated.

I already got my first warning.

That's against the rules here (§2:9) and the staff will almost certainly ban the new account. Just FYI. You agreed to this yourself when you signed up.http://www.scienceforums.net/index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=boardrules"Registering more than one account to yourself is not permitted without administrative approval. "Sockpuppet" accounts (those registered with the intent of using them to spread the original member's ideas, or for other malicious purposes) will be banned on sight, as well as those registered to evade a ban."On another note, it's "so long" FFS!!

Thanks

I'm going to create a new profile. My current profile has lost too much respect and it has caused the loss of a fellow member, O.

I'll restart my digital life as a more neutral and less opinionated persona.

Read the introduction!

I wanted to discuss the MAIN cause. Do you people have a problem with reading? You people are idiots!

This is a bizarre statement. To think there is EVER any one cause for a social effect is the uninformed position.

How is absurd to posit that complex situations are based on numerous factors? If you think there is one singular explanation, why don't you publish it and show all those scholars specialized in conflict research that you got the solution all along?

I gained absolutely nothing from reading everyone's opinion in this thread.

The only thing I gained was negative reputation. I shouldn't have started this thread. Delete it moderator.

Thanks for wasting my time.

The mods are conspiring against intellectual conversion and me by interrupting all the time.

Trying to find a single main cause is likely not possible.

 

Most of the people on this forum are losers with uneducated opinions. I'm leaving this forum.

Just now, Charlie Hebdo attack.

10 journalists killed and 2 police officers killed.

The attacks said they were avenging the insults towards the prophet Muhammad.

Btw:

If you can't argue a point don't resort to degrading my reputation.

Friends, has anyone of you any sign of Ophiolite after 26th of December? On another Forum, somewhere?

Just give O some time to cool off. O will be back.

So then we ARE all in agreement ?

There are causes other than religion, and holy book teachings which are responsible for Islamic radicalism.

 

That was Vexen's original premise, was it not ?

I want to know the central cause for radicalisation in Muslim culture. What contributes the most to this. We established that there are many causes but does how much does foreign policy and religious ideology contribute to radicalisation?

Why does radical Islam dominant the news so often?

Few people on this forum seem interested in this topic. Most opinions I've read are poorly informed.

Christians do behead people, and burn them alive. Look at what is happening in Africa. Of course it doesn't fir the western propaganda machine. American conservatives have a very high death toll on their hands. They are also responsible for systemic racism, and an obscene wealth split. Christian fundamentalists want women back in the kitchen, gays to be locked up or executed, and they want Christian Law as their governing model.

 

Why did you quote MigL? Your comment wasn't related to MigL's post.

Yes, people do commit oppressive behaviour and violence in the name of Christianity. But, is this as prevalent as it is in the Islamic religion? I would like evidence for that.

Thank you studiot, your last sentence was the most valid and important contribution made to this topic so far.

And you thought it was a useless topic ( Ha ! )

 

Oh, and your prejudices are showing !

 

 

Scientifically, ZVBXRPL may be correct and both studiot and MigL may be wrong.

"The Suicide Terrorism Database at Flinders University in Australia, which documents all suicide bombings committed in the Middle East between 1981 and 2006, demonstrates that it is politics, not religious fanaticism that leads terrorists to blow themselves up. This is supported by research conducted at the University of Chicago’s Project on Security and Terrorism, which was partly funded by the Defense Department’s Threat Reduction Agency. The authors, Robert A. Pape and James K. Feldman, examined more than 2,200 suicide attacks across the world from 1980 to present. Their research reveals that more than 90 percent of suicide attacks are directed at an occupying force."

"When the U.S. removed Saddam and put 1 million Sunnis on the unemployment line, the 20th-century Western-manufactured country of Iraq disappeared, and Iraqis reached back for older identities: Sunni, Shiite and Kurd." - CJ WERLEMAN, ALTERNET

You may have your own opinion but not your own facts.

He further explains how Islam may not be a tertiary motive of radical behaviour but an inherent consequence of Islam.

"The idea that Islam is a “peaceful religion hijacked by extremists” is a dangerous fantasy—and it is now a particularly dangerous fantasy for Muslims to indulge. It is not at all clear how we should proceed in our dialogue with the Muslim world, but deluding ourselves with euphemisms is not the answer. It now appears to be a truism in foreign policy circles that real reform in the Muslim world cannot be imposed from the outside. But it is important to recognize why this is so—it is so because the Muslim world is utterly deranged by its religious tribalism. In confronting the religious literalism and ignorance of the Muslim world, we must appreciate how terrifyingly isolated Muslims have become in intellectual terms. The problem is especially acute in the Arab world. Consider: According to the United Nations’ Arab Human Development Reports, less than 2% of Arabs have access to the Internet. Arabs represent 5% of the world’s population and yet produce only 1% of the world’s books, most of them religious. In fact, Spain translates more books into Spanish each year than the entire Arab world has translated into Arabic since the ninth century."