alkis3

ahh,you in terms of money..
well if we talk about culture,money is my last Association

 

However if you were to remove the nuclear weapons from the equation the United States and their allies have the ability to successfully wage a ground war against any Russian aggression.

can't argue
The only thing I know that Russia has a very modern tanks

and for antiaircraft missiles Russia ,stealth airplanes are not the problem

 

Firstly, I am a she, not a he.

I'm not about you

"HE"-translator

 

Предупреждение дано было по поводу оскорбительного языка, который Вы использовали, не из-за каких-либо политических очков вы сделали (вы не делал, насколько я мог видеть).

I use a translator ,I don't know why he writes offensive

I have nothing bad in his comments do not write

 

but I think it is quite obvious that human rights violations are far more severe in Russia as opposed to the United States.

just listen Edward Snowden about which human rights are respected in USA

I could lead you to some facts,but I have already given a warning for criticizing the U.S.

so I will refrain,in order not to have the ban for political views

what have I offended?

this is not an insult- "The United States as a nation just has the advantage over Russia in almost every way one could gauge advantage: economically, militarily, culturally, diplomatically."

I said the same thing for the sake of Russia,or praise can only U.S.?

 

The United States as a nation just has the advantage over Russia in almost every way one could gauge advantage: economically, militarily, culturally, diplomatically.

in the military definitely not,we are at equal or Russia ahead

the rest do not know,in my opinion your culture is much inferior to the culture of Russia,But this is only my opinion,not going to argue this

 

I feel as if your understanding of the English language limits your ability to communicate your points.

I know English a maximum of 10-20 words

 

http://en.wikipedia....oning_and_death

you look at America,there are no such cases?

they pursue Julian Assange , Edward Snowden and they would have killed them if you get to them,

the Americans hold Manning in jail for telling the truth

Well, I say once again that in Russia you may say that Putin is bad,for you it will not be in prison.
But you do it with dignity

criticize Putin please, but only do not mix politics and circus

in Sochi Cossacks attacked riot pussy,there riot pussy no one is offended,and on this, no one is arrested

But those who attacked riot pussy Cossacks were arrested,and there opened a criminal case against them

because an attack not legally,and I support that,the Cossacks were not supposed to attack

and if Cossacks will be put in jail,it will be legally

not so as to dress up like a clown and run around with bare ass on the street, of shouting Putin go ,or like this

you should Express his point of view, adequately - it is not prohibited

if you want to criticize Putin,you have to speak like a normal person,but not like a clown .
If you'll behave like a pussy riot about you will say that you are crazy,not a politician
If you talk to criticize the policy,act normal,then no you will not face punishment

if to speak about gay parades

that gay parades were held in Moscow and St. Petersburg.and they were permitted by the government

but the citizens went out against gay ,and was a fight

but now not give permission,but gay parades still go ,and end with a fight

 

I think you misunderstand. You have the freedom to express any viewpoint, however not the freedom to express it in any way you want.

I think the same thing about you,what you also don't understand

in Russia, too, can Express their opinion,but not so idiotic as it was done by pussy riot

 

So, freedom of speech is not freedom to do whatever the hell you want in public, it's the freedom to hold whatever view you want and express it without the fear of being oppressed for it.

so that's about it I to you all day and say

in Russia you can Express their opinion,but within acceptable bounds of decency

 

In a more general sense, why does someone else, be it Pussy Riot, homosexuals, etc affect your freedom?

as the word freak will affect their freedom...

Now talking about the limitations,but recently you told me to tell you all,that is freedom.

The main thing that no physical damage,and the fact that someone would be offended, no problem

I you understand

sorry,but I'm out of discussion

and what do the gay parades,now we are not talking about parades

now people said to me that they have freedom of speech,but forbade me to say the words

this is what does freedom of speech?

 

Freedom of speech has always come with certain restrictions. You aren't free to yell "FIRE" in a crowded theater because you could harm people in the panic.

you contradict yourself

first you say that you can talk all

and now see boxes...Oh well..interesting freedom

you see,you are saying that Russia has no freedom of speech ,but you have also no

 

There is obviously a very large language barrier here and your second line is certainly confusing, but regardless, the use of the word, 'whores,' is unacceptable here.

 

 

First, please avoid calling anyone a "freak". That's an emotional attack aimed directly at a group of people you don't happen to agree with, which makes your label seem intolerant and bigoted.

why you forbid to utter some words?

isn tolerant and freedom,if I have this opinion,why I shouldn't speak words?

so sorry,but freedom is nowhere to be found,you just imagine freedom ,and here's the example

many people voted about what norms should be in a public place

and one freak cannot be larger than those of many people

a public place is not a place for 1 person,so he acted like he wants

home is his place,he can walk around naked,practice homosexuality and do anything

 

Pussy Riot chose the Church because it's a little difficult getting into the Kremlin to protest. Why is that not understandable?

there is not clear a group of naked FEMEN meet with Putin and why pussy riot not met as

you talk a little strange

you talk about pussy riot rights,but they forget that pussy riot initiators of their actions

where is your logic rights insulted citizens?you say 3 girls wanted to sing,but a million people did not want them to do in the Church

let them sing at home anything,or near the entrance to the store

and even if you do not see the harm to milions people ,it does not mean that no harm

 

If you separate out an entire class of people and deem them as subhuman and subjugate and oppress them, there is no freedom. There isn't freedom unless there is freedom for all.

freaks in Russia does not inhibit,Frick should not inspire their views on others,for example to hold gay parades

there is a common place ,and a private place

in General, you must adhere to the General rules

at home you can be gay,Frick and any whom you want

but in a public place behave social norms ,so this place is called a public ,not a personal

well,we just have different views on freedom.

you think that freedom is everything except the physical harm

I think that freedom is when no harm at all,nor any manifestation

 

Pussy Riots are not enemies of believers.
They are rather enemies of putin.

then why did they come into the Church and not in the Kremlin

their logic is not understandable

 

Почему вы получаете свободу духа, но люди, которые не такие, как вы-нет?

Not such ?You think all people are biologically different?

if you talk about the norm,then let's be based on biology

in biology homosexuality is normal for people?

if not,you want to argue with nature?

human history

 

How, exactly, is oppressing people for a fundamental aspect of their personal identity 'freedom of the spirit'?

and you think that this is the norm?

with such normaly you'll just ruin mankind..

I think our dispute around in a circle,we just have different views on things..senseless dispute

 

Same as I know the gay life style is not for me, in that sense it is "wrong", but I don't force this on others who think differently.

you do not understand that it is not the views,and not a lifestyle.

it is difficult problems in need of assistance.

you're missing the point concepts thoughts and problems

 

Again, the is all tempered with minimizing the potential harm to others including wider society.

this encouragement problems and do not address the causes of the problems

 

There is plenty of legal protection and policing in the west, just we like to do our best to respect all sides of the

you cannot do everything possible to please everyone

American freedom increases the problems of the people

if a person has mental problems,and he thinks he walk naked it's okay,or that gays think that their way of life is right

all of these examples,it deviations from a healthy person,and you instead of helping these people,promote their health problems

this is a terrible freedom,which can destroy many lives

if the fact that I have listed you think norm,then where do you get the criterion of the norm?

if you believe in God,look for these issues does the Bible say

 

The US is quite up on spiritual freedom from what I understand via the first amendment

if I have no protection from abuse,or from the fact that the streets will walk addicts ,or naked\

for me it's a mess,not freedom

if you have suppressed physically it is not terrible

if you are depressed in spirit this is the end

ydoaPs

you say the physical liberty

but physical freedom is not the main freedom,chief freedom is spiritual freedom

if you live in a society where you can not attack,but can offend

is it you call that freedom?you will only receive the freedom of the body,but not the freedom of the spirit

 

In a tolerant society one allows both groups to exist and do what they do.

but it is not possible

one group excludes the behavior of the first,and conversely