davidivad

@relativity;

relax, if you were not here posting your ideas we would have nobody to argue with. i think this is a logical assumption because if you have the answers there is nothing left to argue.

you are drawing flies by entering your personal concepts. on this forum, personal concepts are not worth a poop.

my suggestion is that you steer clear of the poop deck until you have been here a while. you will eventually get an idea of what you can do without making a stink.

please consider my humor.

i think it is important to have ideas but it is best to adhere to the unspoken rules here.

you make a good argument.

given that only humans will seek out such occupations it is only logical to consider them human beings. we must not forget this.

while i disagree that humans are likely to react to a threat with aggression (it is not the only solution), it happens quite often and is only profitable for one party.

i believe that officers are trained to maintain dominance in a situation to reduce the possibility of conflict.

in other words, if you assert a dominating persona you are likely a threat, then the officer must maintenance the situation as quickly as possible to prevent losing control of the situation or allowing a situation to develop.

i still hate the idea of relinquishing my dominance which is key for my survival.

i think that many conflicts with the police can be resolved by seminars or training classes for officers having a certain amount of time in.

this would be a refresher on conflict resolution.

i have always found that police i run into take a liking to me.

i must be emanating some kind of threatening signal.

"are you looking at me, cause i'm looking at you, cause your looking at me..."

this is my best explanation.

i think he wants a recognizable name to say "this is a great book"

I am not a scientist nor an author first off.

however, I am curious as to what you mean by book back.

fallacies are an ugliness that often give that feeling of talking to a troll.

many will argue their point in a way that just stops short of kicking you in the knee or calling you a name.

i enjoy debating things as much as the next guy, but some readers are not listening to how they project themselves to the reader.

in fact, what you get quite often is "spanking" the new or less educated members with the rules.

this is a forum for all who like science and you can easily make the tone of your thread less offensive.

if, as members of this community (that's what it is), use constructive feedback most of the time we will end up with threads

that contribute to the knowledge of this collection. spanking each other has ended up in a pointless circular thread every time i have seen it.

ADD TO THE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE!

and have a great day

we really only have vague ideas at best about inertia but we do have a few.

http://www.calphysics.org/inertia.html

be prepared. it is not a light read, but this is our current level of speculation.

Joy, Guilt, Anger,Love by Giovanni Frazzetto

starting out pretty good.

yes there are various possibilities available.

i had actually considered an atmosphere during the early stages of formation and development. i decided to opt out due to the temp measurements of pluto and then decided to look more at metallic hydrogen. i definitely agree with the elements argon, co2, methane, hydrogen, helium, and nitrogen.

i like the idea of no atmosphere for another reason. it takes less fuel to get into orbit. at five times the earth's mass we could get stuck on a planet that gives a short and laborious life. that is a much greater escape velocity even without an atmosphere. we may get to the surface and not have the umph to get back into orbit.

of course the size is a wild estimate.

i do like your idea of another sister planet out there with an atmosphere.

don't get discouraged if there are flaws in the topic.

they will be found.

black holes can be daunting abysmal holes in which everyone loves to prey.

in the end not much is known about them except that they can suck.

i'm am just a poor guy but i have coffee.

as far as the ladies are concerned i would have to say that it depends on that particular lady. i prepare to pay and if she looks particularly or honestly offended (some american ladies are quite stubborn) then i will let her pay and catxch the tip so i do not feel like a loser.

i definitely spoil my child. she is where most of my money goes. my own mother tells me i do too much so point taken.

sorry about the crosspost mike.

once i realized my mistake it was already out there.

please consider my previous post as a multitasking error.

i broke out the grill today.

cheddar brauts

ribs

hamburgers

not sure if i can eat it all before it goes bad (silly expenditure).

i will have to call in a few favors...

sounds rough.

i hope that something good comes of it.

in the end, it is about the people.

you are welcome.

I am Pro kickbacks at the Olympics don't know,maybe they were

but if to speak about freedom,Edward Snowden said that the American government was listening to private conversations of citizens by phone

is this freedom?

and the American press silent on the fact that in Ukraine the demonstrators attacked the police and shot at the police

yes, we are at a point where we have to decide how much freedom to give up in order to be safe.

this may be off topic but i have to ask.

who were the demonstrators? does anyone know?

i would say that the press, in america at least has a sensationalism to it that you have to take into account when approaching it.

speaking of meat, do you have a political stance on crimea?

i think this is important because it connects with the issues at hand and what role different government models play.

there is no doubt that our president has a degree of power over the media but the people still have a choice which often creates some pretty big debates.

i wasn't referring to you.

i was simply verifying that politics can be sticky.

not to invoke temper, it is a valid point and quite reasonable to assume that people will be people as you are yourself.

my point was simply validated by the discussion itself.

I also think that all people are people

but only politicians and the military in any country inspire a lot of misinformation (brainwash)

for this reason,this many people in different countries have the false judgments....

yes, politics at it's finest.

i did not say that russians were americans.

your fallacy amazes me!

while russians are not americans this does not mean that one group is not people.

can you find the fallacy in that sentence?

there's no place like home

there's no place like home.

i think the issue here is to due with the set-up of the experiment.

like i said.

in the end people are people.

i see the subject from more of a field theory perspective.

consider a small cube of space.

it contains a huge amount of potential energy in it.

in fact it has two opposing fields of energy in it.

one is just barely more than the other resulting in a very slight leftover energy.

this leftover is dark energy.

spacer expands in a fight to get back to zero.

as you might imagine the result is an ever faster expanding expanse of space.