Rajnish Kaushik

ok

i was about to request you for the same

oh no feeling bad for young boy

ookkkkkkkkk thanks bro

means i was right indeed yeeeeeeee

felling blessed!

kk thanks for advising

ok

ok

please unlock it mr admin

ok

ok i will try

Why were you using a pressure cooker? Just use a normal pot or pan on the stove top.

ok i till try it tomorrow

You aren't listening to what people are saying to you. Assume that the question is asking you about the life that we already know, not any other type of life we don't know about. Do you think Pluto could support, say, a rabbit? Why or why not? What about anerobic bacteria (as another example)? What is it about the Earth that allows organisms to live and thrive on it?

can you please simplify it i am just an 14 year old boy

i tried in pressure cooker but only 10-20 of 100 were poped

others burnt

but there life can be nitrogen based or helium based and they require cold and dark environment to survive!

 

Hey, it could be worse! At least you are not being ignored.

you are wrong.

moontan is right.

Your reputation will increase soon.

No Rajnish, you need to step back and watch what is going on here, you are not an idiot but you tend to assert things with no way to back them up, go slow, research your questions and answers as far as you can before putting them out there. Don't worry about reputation points at this stage, learn to ask the right questions in the right way... If you disagree with an answer then research it and find out if you are wrong or if maybe the other person is wrong, don't rashly jump to conclusions... google is your friend, sometimes the way the question is asked is as important as the question...

thnx friends

ok

As mentioned there life support systoms can be different

ok

but we can bend the time and space stream exactly as black hole and wormholes

 

Since the laws reflect how nature behaves, we can't "make whatever laws we want" and call it science. Telling nature how it must behave behave is ideology, or perhaps something else.

What we can do is on paper change our mathematical models and see how that changes things. This could be a useful exersise in undertsanding physics, say what would happen to quantum mechanics if Planck's constant was much larger, or the mass of the electron much heavier etc. One could try adding "as of yet unseen" particles to your models, or adding extra terms in interactions (nom-minimal coupling) and so on..

It maybe possible that the physics we see today can accomodate these extra peices or maybe not. Either way, it could be useful in understanding nature. However, this would not actually be changing nature in anyway, just trying to modifty how we describe it.

With your opening question, it is not exactly obvious that physics does not allow time travel.

do

but there life support factors may be different

how to upload it?

i googled it but no use