Jump to content

Resonance structure


aurorab

Recommended Posts

In fact, neither image is correct at all.

 

Firstly, you are missing the + charge on the nitrogen in all of them. A nitrogen with 4 bonds will have a + charge. If it didn't, the nitrobenzene would have a - charge, but it doesn't.

 

You first image looks very bizarre. Why have you got all three double bonds breaking in the ring like that? Even if that did happen (it definitely doesn't), you've completely missed out the 3 positive charges that would be on the other carbons in the ring.

 

The second one is also a bit off. In the first step, why do you take the electrons away from the oxygen rather than the double bond in the ring? What you have drawn, which generates a + charge on the oxygen, doesn't make a lot of chemical sense. This will change the charge you have put on the ring. Even if your first step were correct, you would still be missing a structure between your last resonance structure and the original one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you very much!

No problems.

 

"In the first step, why do you take the electrons away from the oxygen rather than the double bond in the ring?"

Because of R+.

I don't know what you mean by this. In any case, it's wrong. The electrons don't move that way. You generate a positive charge in the ring, not a negative one.

 

Could you explain your logic behind the first image? I'm struggling to understand what you were trying to do there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.