CharonY, on 15 January 2012 - 04:17 AM, said:
The important bit regarding bacteriostatics is that they reversibly inhibit growth. If, at any point, it result in cell death, they are generally classified as bacteriocides. Note that lethality not only depends on the molecular target of the antibiotics but also the physiological context of the cell.
Quinolones have different ways to interact with DNA, resulting in cell death. Generally intefering with DNA replication is not necessarily lethal, however, interference of certain quinolones as trovafloxacin during dvision will mess up the replication so much, that the division does not work and the cells die. Other quinolones act upon RNA synthesis, for instance and are lethal under different conditions. Bet lactams inhibit cell wall synthesis, thus cells that are actively growing will be killed (i.e. it is bacteriocidal), however it is ineffective against cells that are not actively growing.
Thanks for your reply

. I understood the bactericidal part now but I still have a question about bacteriostatic drugs. Now definition of bacteriostatic means reversibly inhibit bacterial growth. . Now my question is even though protein synthesis is inhibited, the bacteria can still replicate and divide using DNA replication, they won't be able to cause damage but they will still increase. So isn't this contradictory with the definition. So when the drug is removed, you will suddenly find lot of bacteria who are now free to attack with full potential. Also I wished I asked this earlier, since your last bit was exactly the question asked in the mini test which I couldn't answer. Why are beta lactams not effective against resting organims.
This post has been edited by scilearner: 15 January 2012 - 11:21 AM