Science Forums: What is bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic mean in relation to site of drug action? - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What is bacteriocidal and bacteriostatic mean in relation to site of drug action? Rate Topic: -----

#1 scilearner 


Atom
Hello everyone,

Bacteriocidal- Example quinolones who inhibit DNA synthesis
Bacteriostatic- like aminoglycosides which inhibit protein synthesis

Now my question is bacteriocidal means bacteria must be killed, now if DNA synthesis is inhibited, the bacteria won't be able to replicate and create proteins. Ok the lack of protein would kill the bacteria.

Now bacteriostatic means prevention of bacterial growth. How can inhibiting protein synthesis not kill the bacteria, and how does it prevent bacterial replication.

Also what category does beta lactamases which inhibit cell wall syntheis fall into.

Thanks :)
0

#2 CharonY 


Icon
Biology Expert
The important bit regarding bacteriostatics is that they reversibly inhibit growth. If, at any point, it result in cell death, they are generally classified as bacteriocides. Note that lethality not only depends on the molecular target of the antibiotics but also the physiological context of the cell.

Quinolones have different ways to interact with DNA, resulting in cell death. Generally intefering with DNA replication is not necessarily lethal, however, interference of certain quinolones as trovafloxacin during dvision will mess up the replication so much, that the division does not work and the cells die. Other quinolones act upon RNA synthesis, for instance and are lethal under different conditions. Bet lactams inhibit cell wall synthesis, thus cells that are actively growing will be killed (i.e. it is bacteriocidal), however it is ineffective against cells that are not actively growing.

This post has been edited by CharonY: 15 January 2012 - 04:21 AM

0

#3 scilearner 


Atom

View PostCharonY, on 15 January 2012 - 04:17 AM, said:

The important bit regarding bacteriostatics is that they reversibly inhibit growth. If, at any point, it result in cell death, they are generally classified as bacteriocides. Note that lethality not only depends on the molecular target of the antibiotics but also the physiological context of the cell.

Quinolones have different ways to interact with DNA, resulting in cell death. Generally intefering with DNA replication is not necessarily lethal, however, interference of certain quinolones as trovafloxacin during dvision will mess up the replication so much, that the division does not work and the cells die. Other quinolones act upon RNA synthesis, for instance and are lethal under different conditions. Bet lactams inhibit cell wall synthesis, thus cells that are actively growing will be killed (i.e. it is bacteriocidal), however it is ineffective against cells that are not actively growing.


Thanks for your reply :). I understood the bactericidal part now but I still have a question about bacteriostatic drugs. Now definition of bacteriostatic means reversibly inhibit bacterial growth. . Now my question is even though protein synthesis is inhibited, the bacteria can still replicate and divide using DNA replication, they won't be able to cause damage but they will still increase. So isn't this contradictory with the definition. So when the drug is removed, you will suddenly find lot of bacteria who are now free to attack with full potential. Also I wished I asked this earlier, since your last bit was exactly the question asked in the mini test which I couldn't answer. Why are beta lactams not effective against resting organims.

This post has been edited by scilearner: 15 January 2012 - 11:21 AM

0

#4 CharonY 


Icon
Biology Expert

Quote

the bacteria can still replicate and divide using DNA replication


Nope. All replication is protein-dependent. Think of the mechanisms of cell growth and DNA replication. Would a protein-free cell be able to do any of this? If you inhibit novel protein synthesis, the cell would have to rely on what it already has. Depending on what it is doing it could kill it, or just inhibit further growth.

For the latter question I advise you to look up precisely the function of beta lactams. Then think about what happens to the cell walls of actively growing cells as opposed to resting ones.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users