Science Forums: Chemical Reaction Procession - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Chemical Reaction Procession what pKA determines whether a rxn proceeds Rate Topic: -----

#1 blazinfury 


Quark
Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa?

A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?
0

#2 User is online  mississippichem 


Icon
fluorescent protein

View Postblazinfury, on 10 January 2012 - 04:47 AM, said:

Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa?

A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?


Remember that we can write a pKa for a reaction but not for a compound per se. Often times it looks like a pKa is written for a compound but it is really just the reaction:

 HA \rightarrow H^{+}+A^{-}

So obviously here the pKa is:

 pKa = -\log \left ( \frac{[H^{+}][A^{-}]}{[HA]}\cdot \frac{\gamma_{H} \gamma_{A}}{\gamma_{\mathrm{HA}}} \right )

Where the all the activity coefficients,  \gamma are very close to unity for an ideal solution.

So the answer to your question is neither. An acid/base equilibrium reaction with a low pKa will be product favored when written in the form:

 HA \rightarrow H^{+}+A^{-}

Or will be reactant favored if written as:

 H^{+} + A^{-} \rightarrow HA

*I don't know how to LaTeX equilibrium arrows so forgive my notational travesty please :o .

Remember that the equilibrium constant says nothing about the kinetics of a reaction. You can use equilibrium to obtain thermodynamic state functions like Gibbs energy, a measure of spontaneity, but this says nothing about the reaction "proceeding". A reaction can be both thermodynamically and equilibrium favored but proceed at a rate that is slow enough to be practically unobservable.

This post has been edited by mississippichem: 10 January 2012 - 11:04 PM

You've come a long way. Remember back when we defined what a velocity meant? Now we are talking about an antisymmetric tensor of second rank in four dimensions.

-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
0

#3 hypervalent_iodine 


Icon
Empress of Everything
http://www.sciencefo...latex-tutorial/

There is no excuse!! :P

Quote

Bidirectional Equations

We sometimes need an equation that is not mono-directional but can flow in two ways and we thus require another arrow form:

6CO2 + 6H2O <=> C6H12O6 + 6O2

0

#4 User is online  mississippichem 


Icon
fluorescent protein

View Posthypervalent_iodine, on 10 January 2012 - 11:47 PM, said:



Bah.

\mathrm{nice} \ \mathrm{person} <=>\mathrm{bad} \ \mathrm{person}

You are being mostly product favored right now. :P,  K_{c} >>> 1 .
You've come a long way. Remember back when we defined what a velocity meant? Now we are talking about an antisymmetric tensor of second rank in four dimensions.

-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
0

#5 hypervalent_iodine 


Icon
Empress of Everything
Maybe I'll go to a neo-nazi convention and try to shift the equilibrium to the left.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users