Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa?
A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?
Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!
|
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.
|
|
| Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse | |
Page 1 of 1
Chemical Reaction Procession what pKA determines whether a rxn proceeds
#2 10 January 2012 - 11:02 PM
blazinfury, on 10 January 2012 - 04:47 AM, said:
Does a chemical reaction proceed from low pKa to high pKa or high pKa to low pKa?
A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?
A large Ka implies how readily a reaction goes toward the products. Now since pKa=-log(Ka), wouldn't that imply that a chemcial reaction goes from high pKa to low pKa?
Remember that we can write a pKa for a reaction but not for a compound per se. Often times it looks like a pKa is written for a compound but it is really just the reaction:

So obviously here the pKa is:
![pKa = -\log \left ( \frac{[H^{+}][A^{-}]}{[HA]}\cdot \frac{\gamma_{H} \gamma_{A}}{\gamma_{\mathrm{HA}}} \right )](/latex/img/644f7f1ad6068ecc33e37a72e8c88d35-1.png)
Where the all the activity coefficients,
are very close to unity for an ideal solution.So the answer to your question is neither. An acid/base equilibrium reaction with a low pKa will be product favored when written in the form:

Or will be reactant favored if written as:

*I don't know how to LaTeX equilibrium arrows so forgive my notational travesty please
Remember that the equilibrium constant says nothing about the kinetics of a reaction. You can use equilibrium to obtain thermodynamic state functions like Gibbs energy, a measure of spontaneity, but this says nothing about the reaction "proceeding". A reaction can be both thermodynamically and equilibrium favored but proceed at a rate that is slow enough to be practically unobservable.
This post has been edited by mississippichem: 10 January 2012 - 11:04 PM
You've come a long way. Remember back when we defined what a velocity meant? Now we are talking about an antisymmetric tensor of second rank in four dimensions.
-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
- Posts: 1,461 | Joined: 27-March 10
Reply
#3 10 January 2012 - 11:47 PM
http://www.sciencefo...latex-tutorial/
There is no excuse!!
There is no excuse!!
Quote
Bidirectional Equations
We sometimes need an equation that is not mono-directional but can flow in two ways and we thus require another arrow form:

We sometimes need an equation that is not mono-directional but can flow in two ways and we thus require another arrow form:

- Posts: 1,083 | Joined: 09-January 11
Reply
#4 10 January 2012 - 11:52 PM
hypervalent_iodine, on 10 January 2012 - 11:47 PM, said:
Bah.

You are being mostly product favored right now.
.
You've come a long way. Remember back when we defined what a velocity meant? Now we are talking about an antisymmetric tensor of second rank in four dimensions.
-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
-Feynman Lectures on Physics II
- Posts: 1,461 | Joined: 27-March 10
Reply
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help
Sign In »
Register Now!












