Science Forums: Different responses to Fermi Paradox - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 8 Pages +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Different responses to Fermi Paradox Rate Topic: -----

#141 Islandman59 


Lepton
I have a very basic theory:

Perhaps the genesis of life needed (or took) a certain amount of time to evolve or transpire, so that would explain why there may not be civilizations that are far more advanced than ours. Maybe we are slightly ahead of most. Maybe the building blocks of life have always existed throughout the universe in old galaxies and asteroids all along, and the final ingredient (time) needed to be added before it could begin the process. Then this “fertile” state was spread by asteroids to newer planets.



0

#142 G Anthony 


Quark
No mention of variations on the anthropic principle. Like, we ARE the extraterrestrials. Trivial, it's true. But, there is another thing, we have been seriously looking for only a few decades. Why is it surprising that we have not yet found what we are looking for? Give us another few hundred years and then come back to me and say there is a true paradox here.
0

#143 User is online  Widdekind 


Atom
Hypothesized "Dyson spheres", wrapping around then-hidden central stars, would plausibly re-radiate at ~300K. Such "stars in bags" would plausibly resemble ultra-cool, ultra-large red-giant stars, e.g. RGB, AGB.
0

Share this topic:


  • 8 Pages +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users