kirving Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 (edited) I'm willing to explain things further if anyone is interested. Existence Properties https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dg4rX67TIMuI_wzpJjrGetWtUO4bgwzpNA8aM-qEvwg/edit?usp=sharingMass Effects https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Xvw3Cwwbej9FI0fvQHSAyilcZbN9oloBLhFxfj-v2Q/edit?usp=sharing Basic Existence Understanding https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LepQHo7BuNATGHNPLqQuRjMC3Wfy8kIPe3wD6SAWzlA/edit?usp=sharing Edited January 13, 2017 by kirving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 ! Moderator Note People are supposed to be able to participate in a discussion without clicking on links (rule 2.7). If you wish to discuss whatever this is, do it here. If it's not mainstream, it should go in speculations. Make sure you check out the guidelines of that section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirving Posted January 13, 2017 Author Share Posted January 13, 2017 (edited) Sorry, It's a little too much to post directly in the post. Edited January 13, 2017 by kirving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 You can move it if you want, however it's all real. It's a little to much to post directly in the post. ! Moderator Note From my brief review it doesn't live up to the minimum level of rigor we expect. Lots of hand waving, but no science. And if you aren't going to bother complying with the rules, you don't get a chance for feedback that might add some rigor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts