Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ampere's Law


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Sriman Dutta

Sriman Dutta

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 435 posts
  • LocationKolkata, India

Posted 23 December 2016 - 04:19 AM

Hello everybody,

The Ampere's Law states that the total B-field generated by a conducting element of length l is directly proportional to the current element I.

Thus,

 Bl = \mu_0 I

Where \mu_0 is the constant of proportionality. 

But, will the constant of proportionality be \mu_0 or  \mu_0 \mu_r ?

These two sites use two different formulations.....

http://www.electrica...iot-savart-law/

http://hyperphysics..../magcur.html#c1


Edited by Sriman Dutta, 23 December 2016 - 04:21 AM.

  • 0
We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence is then not an act but a habit.
-Aristotle

#2 studiot

studiot

    Genius

  • Senior Members
  • 6,346 posts
  • LocationSomerset, England

Posted 23 December 2016 - 10:18 AM

Both are right!

 

The Biot-Savart page is simply more complete in that it takes into account the medium via {\mu _r}

 
For air and many purposes such as the space between sub atomic particles {\mu _r} is so close to 1 that we often ignore it.
That is what is done in your second link from hyperphysics.
 
A more satisfactory way to deal with this is to use
 
 
\mu  = {\mu _0}{\mu _r}
 
Then there is no ambiguity.
 
Incidentally your hyperphysics link has some good pictures of the circular magnetic field lines around straight conductors carrying current.
Look carefully at these and think about your other thread on crossed wires.
 
 

  • 1

#3 Sriman Dutta

Sriman Dutta

    Molecule

  • Senior Members
  • 435 posts
  • LocationKolkata, India

Posted 23 December 2016 - 11:36 AM

So, it's better to use \mu_0 \mu_r for accuracy. Thanks...


  • 0
We are what we repeatedly do.
Excellence is then not an act but a habit.
-Aristotle




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users