Guest Emperor Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Hey guys, I was wondering if DNA can survive through intense heat, more specifically a fire, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dak Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 arent there some thermaphillic archaebacter that can survive the kind of temperatures found around the mouth of a volcano? i assume they have some way of protecting their DNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chatlack Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Some different forms of DNA can live , I think... But it would be very different living , cause it cant change in time for this condition. It must have become living in this condition... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 arent there some thermaphillic archaebacter that can survive the kind of temperatures found around the mouth of a volcano? i assume they have some way of protecting their DNA? I'm not sure what temperature they can withstand, or for how long. IIRC they have been cultured up to 113 C. But the thing is that DNA itself won't be able to withstand a fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 No, it would definately denature in a fire. Maybe the bacteria have quick-acting enzymes that can speedily repair DNA. Is that how they retain their DNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coral Rhedd Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 I read that the reason that some of the 9-11 victims could not be identified was because intense heat had made it impossible to retrieve their DNA, but they saved the remains just the same because they thought they might someday have the technology to affect an ID. Does this mean that some DNA may remain but that we just don't have the techology to retrieve it -- or were they just being nice and trying to soothe people with the possibility that indentification may some day be possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Maybe the bacteria have quick-acting enzymes that can speedily repair DNA. Is that how they retain their DNA? Well they do, and so do we. They also have specialised proteins that bind to their DNA to stabilise it, and they have a higher number of guanine and cytosine residues in their DNA which makes it more stable. I read that the reason that some of the 9-11 victims could not be identified was because intense heat had made it impossible to retrieve their DNA' date=' but they saved the remains just the same because they thought they might someday have the technology to affect an ID. Does this mean that some DNA may remain but that we just don't have the techology to retrieve it -- or were they just being nice and trying to soothe people with the possibility that indentification may some day be possible?[/quote'] The current techniques are pretty good, if they didn't find any DNA there's probably none there. But who knows what the future will bring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now